Free Access
Med Sci (Paris)
Volume 20, Number 4, Avril 2004
Page(s) 465 - 473
Section Dossier technique
Published online 15 April 2004
  1. Pardue ML, Gall JG. Molecular hybridization of radioactive DNAto the DNA of cytological preparations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1969; 64 : 600–4. [Google Scholar]
  2. Pinkel D, Straume T, Gray JW. Cytogenetic analysis using quantitative, high-sensitivity, fluorescence hybridization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1986; 83 : 2934–8. [Google Scholar]
  3. Cremer T, Landegent J, Bruckner A, et al. Detection of chromosome aberrations in the human interphase nucleus by visualization of specific target DNAs with radioactive and non-radioactive in situ hybridization techniques : diagnosis of trisomy 18 with probe L1.84. Hum Genet 1986; 74 : 346–52. [Google Scholar]
  4. Koch JE, Kolvraa S, Petersen KB, et al. Oligonucleotide-priming methods for the chromosome-specific labelling of alpha satellite DNA in situ. Chromosoma 1989; 98 : 259–65. [Google Scholar]
  5. Pellestor F. Ce que le PRINS peut faire pour vous. Med Sci 1998; 14 : 935–8. [Google Scholar]
  6. Bouayed Abdelmoula N, Portnoï MF, Vialard F, et al. Les techniques de cytogénétique moléculaire : principes et progrès. Med Sci 2000; 16 : 1405–11. [Google Scholar]
  7. Therkelsen AJ, Nielsen A, Kolvraa S. Localisation of the classical DNA satellites on human chromosomes as determined by primed in situ labelling (PRINS). Hum Genet 1997; 100 : 322–6. [Google Scholar]
  8. Coullin P, Andreo B, Charlieu JP, et al. Primed in situ (PRINS) labelling with Alu and satellite primers for rapid characterization of human chromosomes in hybrid cell lines. Chromosome Res 1997; 5 : 307–12. [Google Scholar]
  9. Therkelsen AJ, Nielsen A, Koch J, et al. Staining of human telomeres with primed in situ labeling (PRINS). Cytogenet Cell Genet 1995; 68 : 115–8. [Google Scholar]
  10. Koch J, Hindkjaer J, Kolvraa S, Bolund L. Construction of a panel of chromosome-specific oligonucleotide probes (PRINS-primers) useful for the identification of individual human chromosomes in situ. Cytogenet Cell Genet 1995; 71 : 142–7. [Google Scholar]
  11. Speel EJ, Lawson D, Hopman AH, Gosden J. Multi-PRINS : multiple sequential oligonucleotide primed in situ DNA synthesis reactions label specific chromosomes and produce bands. Hum Genet 1995; 95 : 29–33. [Google Scholar]
  12. Wilkens L, Tchinda J, Komminoth P, Werner M. Single- and double-color oligonucleotide primed in situ labeling (PRINS): applications in pathology. Histochem Cell Biol 1997; 108 : 439–46. [Google Scholar]
  13. Pellestor F, Girardet A, Lefort G, et al. Use of the primed in situ labelling (PRINS) technique for a rapid detection of chromosomes 13, 16, 18, 21, X and Y. Hum Genet 1995; 95 : 12–7. [Google Scholar]
  14. Kadandale JS, Wachtel SS, Tunca Y, et al. Localization of SRY by primed in situ labeling in XX and XY sex reversal. Am J Med Genet 2000; 95 : 71–4. [Google Scholar]
  15. Kadandale JS, Tunca Y, Tharapel AT. Chromosomal localization of single copy genes SRY and SOX3 by primed in situ labeling (PRINS). Microb Comp Genomics 2000; 5 : 71–4. [Google Scholar]
  16. Kadandale JS, Wachtel SS, Tunca Y, et al. Deletion of RBM and DAZ in azoospermia : evaluation by PRINS. Am J Med Genet 2002; 107 : 105–8. [Google Scholar]
  17. Cinti C, Stuppia L, Maraldi NM. Combined use of PRINS and FISH in the study of the dystrophin gene. Am J Med Genet 2002; 107 : 115–8. [Google Scholar]
  18. Tharapel AT, Kadandale JS, Martens PR, et al. Prader Willi/Angelman and DiGeorge/Velocardiofacial syndrome deletions : diagnosis by primed in situ labeling (PRINS). Am J Med Genet 2002; 107 : 119–22. [Google Scholar]
  19. Tharapel SA, Kadandale JS. Primed in situ labeling (PRINS) for evaluation of gene deletions in cancer. Am J Med Genet 2002; 107 : 123–6. [Google Scholar]
  20. Coullin P, Roy L, Pellestor F, et al. PRINS, the other in situ labeling method useful in cellular biology. Am J Med Genet 2002; 107 : 127–35. [Google Scholar]
  21. Yan J, Bronsard M, Drouin R. Creating a new color by omission of 3 end blocking step for simultaneous detection of different chromosomes in multi-PRINS technique. Chromosoma 2001; 109 : 565–70. [Google Scholar]
  22. Pellestor F, Quenesson I, Coignet L, et al. FISH and PRINS, a strategy for rapid chromosome screening : application to the assessment of aneuploidy in human sperm. Cytogenet Cell Genet 1996; 72 : 34–6. [Google Scholar]
  23. Yan J, Marceau D, Drouin R. Tetrasomy 8 is associated with a major cellular proliferative advantage and a poor prognosis. Two cases of myeloid hematologic disorders and review of the literature. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 2001; 125 : 14–20. [Google Scholar]
  24. Drouin R, Holmquist GP, Richer CL. High-resolution replication bands compared with morphologic G- and R-bands. Adv Hum Genet 1994; 22 : 47–115. [Google Scholar]
  25. Andersen CL, Koch J, Kjeldsen E. CpG islands detected by self-primed in situ labeling (SPRINS). Chromosoma 1998; 107 : 260–6. [Google Scholar]
  26. Roy L, Coullin P, Vitrat N, et al. Asymmetrical segregation of chromosomes with a normal metaphase/anaphase checkpoint in polyploid megakaryocytes. Blood 2001; 97 : 2238–47. [Google Scholar]
  27. Saffery R, Irvine DV, Griffiths B, et al. Human centromeres and neocentromeres show identical distribution patterns of > 20 functionally important kinetochore-associated proteins. Hum Mol Genet 2000; 9 : 175–85. [Google Scholar]
  28. Krejci K, Koch J. An in situ study of variant telomeric repeats in human chromosomes. Genomics 1999; 58 : 202–6. [Google Scholar]
  29. Lavoie J, Bronsard M, Lebel M, Drouin R. Mouse telomere analysis using an optimized primed in situ (PRINS) labeling technique. Chromosoma 2003; 111 : 438–44. [Google Scholar]
  30. Go Y, Rakotoarisoa G, Kawamoto Y, et al. PRINS analysis of the telomeric sequence in seven lemurs. Chromosome Res 2000; 8 : 57–65. [Google Scholar]
  31. Russo A, Priante G, Tommasi AM. PRINS localization of centromeres and telomeres in micronuclei indicates that in mouse splenocytes chromatid non-disjunction is a major mechanism of aneuploidy. Mutat Res 1996; 372 : 173–80. [Google Scholar]
  32. Russo A. PRINS tandem labeling of satellite DNA in the study of chromosome damage. Am J Med Genet 2002; 107 : 99–104. [Google Scholar]
  33. Shibasaki Y, Gosden JR. Oligonucleotide PRINS DNA synthesis on extended chromatin preparations. Methods Mol Biol 1997; 71 : 45–51. [Google Scholar]
  34. Cinti C, Santi S, Maraldi NM. Localization of single copy gene by PRINS technique. Nucleic Acids Res 1993; 21 : 5799–800. [Google Scholar]
  35. Troyer DL, Goad DW, Xie H, et al. Use of direct in situ single-copy (DISC) PCR to physically map five porcine microsatellites. Cytogenet Cell Genet 1994; 67 : 199–204. [Google Scholar]
  36. Coullin P, Valent A, Barbounaki I, et al. Rapid identification of chromosomes by in situ hybridization of labelled oligonucleotides and comparison with the PRINS method. CR Acad Sci III 1996; 319 : 901–6. [Google Scholar]
  37. Mogensen J, Kolvraa S, Hindkjaer J, et al. Nonradioactive, sequence-specific detection of RNA in situ by primed in situ labeling (PRINS). Exp Cell Res 1991; 196 : 92–8. [Google Scholar]
  38. Bains MA, Agarwal R, Pringle JH, et al. Flow cytometric quantitation of sequence-specific mRNA in hemopoietic cell suspensions by primer-induced in situ (PRINS) fluorescent nucleotide labeling. Exp Cell Res 1993; 208 : 321–6. [Google Scholar]
  39. Orsetti B, Lefort G, Boulot P, et al. Fetal cells in maternal blood : the use of primed in situ (PRINS) labelling technique for fetal cell detection and sex assessment. Prenat Diagn 1998; 18 : 1014–22. [Google Scholar]
  40. Krabchi K, Gros-Louis F, Yan J, et al. Quantification of all fetal nucleated cells in maternal blood between the 18th and 22nd weeks of pregnancy using molecular cytogenetic techniques. Clin Genet 2001; 60 : 145–50. [Google Scholar]
  41. Pellestor F, Girardet A, Coignet L, et al. Assessment of aneuploidy for chromosomes 8, 9, 13, 16, and 21 in human sperm by using primed in situ labeling technique. Am J Hum Genet 1996; 58 : 797–802. [Google Scholar]
  42. Pellestor F, Girardet A, Coignet L, et al. Cytogenetic analysis of meiotic segregation in sperm from two males heterozygous for reciprocal translocations using PRINS and humster techniques. Cytogenet Cell Genet 1997; 78 : 202–8. [Google Scholar]
  43. Pellestor F, Girardet A, Andreo B, et al. The PRINS technique : potential use for rapid preimplantation embryo chromosome screening. Mol Hum Reprod 1996; 2 : 135–8. [Google Scholar]
  44. Petit C, Martel-Petit V, Fleurentin A, et al. Use of PRINS for preconception screening of polar bodies for common aneuploidies. Prenat Diagn 2000; 20 : 1067–71. [Google Scholar]
  45. Yan J, Zhang XX, Fetni R, Drouin R. Trisomy 8 and monosomy 7 detected in bone marrow using primed in situ labeling, fluorescence in situ hybridization, and conventional cytogenetic analyses. A study of 54 cases with hematological disorders. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 2001; 125 : 30–40. [Google Scholar]
  46. Velagaleti GV, Tharapel SA, Tharapel AT. Validation of primed in situ labeling (PRINS) for interphase analysis : comparative studies with conventional fluorescence in situ hybridization and chromosome analyses. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 1999; 108 : 100–6. [Google Scholar]
  47. Pellestor F, Andreo B, Coullin P. Interphasic analysis of aneuploidy in cancer cell lines using primed in situ labeling. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 1999; 111 : 111–8. [Google Scholar]
  48. Marie B, Antunes L, Baylac F, et al. The PRINS technique. Application to the detection of X and Y chromosomes for follow-up of bone marrow allografts performed with an opposite sex donor. Ann Pathol 1997; 17 : 11–6. [Google Scholar]
  49. Speel EJ, Lawson D, Ramaekers FC, et al. PRINS DNA synthesis on frozen tissue sections. Methods Mol Biol 1997; 71 : 31–7. [Google Scholar]
  50. Ramael M, Van Steelandt H, Stuyven G, et al. Detection of human papilloma virus (HPV) genomes by the primed in situ (PRINS) labelling technique. Pathol Res Pract 1999; 195 : 801–7. [Google Scholar]
  51. Claudio PP, Cinti C, Giordano A. Application of the primer in situ DNA synthesis (PRINS) technique to titer recombinant virus and evaluation of the efficiency of viral transduction. Anal Biochem 2001; 291 : 96–101. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.