EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
Home All issues Volume 18 / No 2 (Février 2002) Med Sci (Paris), 18 2 (2002) 169-180 References
Free Access
Issue
Med Sci (Paris)
Volume 18, Number 2, Février 2002
Page(s) 169 - 180
Section M/S Revues : Articles de Synthèse
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/medsci/2002182169
Published online 15 February 2002
  1. Wilmut I, Schnieke AE, Mc Whir J, Kind AJ, Campbell KHS. Viable offspring derived from fetal and adult mammalian cells. Nature 1997; 385 : 810–3. [Google Scholar]
  2. Weissman IL. Stem cells : units of development, units of regeneration, and units in evolution. Cell 2000; 100 : 157–68. [Google Scholar]
  3. Fuchs E, Segre JA. Stem cells: a new lease on life Cell 2000; 100 : 143–55. [Google Scholar]
  4. Claeys A, Huriet C. Le clonage, la thérapie cellulaire et l’utilisation thérapeutique des cellules embryonnaires. Rapport de l’Office Parlementaire d’Évaluation des Choix Scientifiques et Technologiques, 2000; 2198 : 181 p. [Google Scholar]
  5. Verlhac MH, Kubiak JZ, Clarke HJ, Maro B. Microtubule and chromatin behavior follow MAP kinase activity but not MPF activity during meiosis in mouse oocytes. Development 1994; 120 : 1017–25. [Google Scholar]
  6. Ciemerych MA, Maro B, Kubiak JZ. Control of duration of the first two mitoses in a mouse embryo. Zygote 1999; 7 : 293–300. [Google Scholar]
  7. Aoki F, Worrad DM, Schultz RM. Regulation of transcriptional activity during the first and second cell cycles in the preimplantation mouse embryo. Dev Biol 1997; 181 : 296–307. [Google Scholar]
  8. Schultz RM, Davis W Jr, Stein P, Svoboda P. Reprogramming of gene expression during preimplantation development. J Exp Zool 1999; 285 : 276–82. [Google Scholar]
  9. Thompson EM, Legouy E, Renard JP. Mouse embryos do not wait for the MBT: chromatin and RNA polymerasere modeling in genome activation at the onset of development. Dev Genet 1998; 22h31–42. [Google Scholar]
  10. Mutchardt C, Yaniv M. ATP-dependent chromatin remodelling: SWI/SNF and Co are on the job. J Mol Biol 1999; 293 : 187–98. [Google Scholar]
  11. Legouy E, Thompson EM, Muchardt C, Renard JP. Differential preimplantation regulation of two mouse homologues of the yeast SWI2 protein. Dev Dyn 1998; 212 : 38–48. [Google Scholar]
  12. Krebs JE, Fry CJ, Samuels ML, Peterson CL Global role for chromatin remodeling enzymes in mitotic gene expression. Cell 2000; 102 : 587–98. [Google Scholar]
  13. Bird AP, Wolffe AP. Methylation-induced repression-belts, braces, and chromatin. Cell 1999, 99 : 451–4. [Google Scholar]
  14. Reik W, Dean W, Walter J. Epigenetic reprogramming in mammalian development. Science 2001; 293 : 1089–93. [Google Scholar]
  15. Bourc’his D, Le Bourhis D, Patin D, et al. Delayed and incomplete reprogramming of chromosome methylation patterns in bovine cloned embryons. Curr Biol 2001; 11 : 1542–6. [Google Scholar]
  16. Kang YK, Koo DB, Park JS, et al. Aberrant methylation of donor genome in cloned bovine embryos. Nat Genet 2001; 28 : 173–7. [Google Scholar]
  17. Renard JP, Zhou Qi, LeBourhis D, et al. Nuclear transfer technologies: between successes and doubts. Theriogenology 2002; 57 : 203–22. [Google Scholar]
  18. Heyman Y, Chavatte-Palmer P, LeBourhis D, Camous S, Vignon X, Renard JP. Frequency and occurrence of late gestation losses from cattle cloned embryos. Biol Reprod 2002; 66 : 6–13. [Google Scholar]
  19. Campbell KHS, Loi P, Otaegui PJ, Wilmut I. Cell cycle coordination in embryo cloning by nuclear transfer. Rev Reprod 1996; 1 : 40–6. [Google Scholar]
  20. Zhou Q, Jouneau A, Brochard V, Adenot P, Renard JP. Developmental potential of mouse embryos reconstructed from metaphase embryonic stem cell nuclei. Biol Reprod 2001; 65 : 412–9. [Google Scholar]
  21. Wakayama T, Perry AC, Zuccotti M, Johnson KR, Yanagimachi R. Full-term development of mice from enucleated oocytes injected with cumulus cell nuclei. Nature 1998; 394 : 369–74. [Google Scholar]
  22. Humpherys D, Eggan K, Akutsu H, et al. Epigenetic instability in ES cells and cloned mice. Science 2001; 293 : 95–7. [Google Scholar]
  23. Hill JR, Burghardt RC, Jones K, et al. Evidence for placental abnormality as the major cause of mortality in first trimester somatic cell bovine fetuses. Biol Reprod 2000; 63 : 1787–94. [Google Scholar]
  24. Ohgane J, Wakayama T, Kogo Y, et al. DNA methylation variation in cloned mice. Genesis 2001; 30 : 45–50. [Google Scholar]
  25. Eggan K, Akutsu H, Loring J, et al. Hybrid vigor, fetal overgrowth, and viability of mice derived by nuclear cloning and tetraploid embryo complementation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001; 98 : 6209–14. [Google Scholar]
  26. Doherty AS, Mann MRW, Tremblay KD, Bartolomei MS, Schultz RM. Differential effects of culture on imprinted H19 expression in the preimplantation mouse embryo. Biol Reprod 2000; 62 : 1526–35. [Google Scholar]
  27. Khosla S, Dean W, Brown D, Reik W, Feil R. Culture of preimplantation mouse embryos affects fetal development and the expression of imprinted genes. Biol Reprod 2001; 64 : 918–26. [Google Scholar]
  28. Munsie MJ, Michalska AE, O’Brien CM, Trounson AO, Pera MF, Mountford PS. Isolation of pluripotent embryonic stem cells from reprogrammed adult mouse somatic cell nuclei. Curr Biol 2000; 10 : 989–92. [Google Scholar]
  29. Kawase E, Yamazaki Y, Yagi T, Yanagimachi R, Pedersen RA. Mouse embryonic stem (ES) cell lines established from neuronal cell-derived cloned blastocyts. Genesis 2000; 28 : 156–63. [Google Scholar]
  30. Wakayama T, Tabar V, Rodriguez I, Perry AC, Studer L, Mombaerts P. Differentiation of embryonic stem cell lines generated from adult somatic cells by nuclear transfer. Science 2001; 292 : 740–3. [Google Scholar]
  31. Beddington RS, Robertson EJ. Anterior patterning in mouse. Trends Genet 1998; 14 : 277–84. [Google Scholar]
  32. Chen WS, Manova K, Weinstein DC, et al. Disruption of the HNF-4 gene, expressed in visceral endoderm, leads to cell death in embryonic ectoderm and impaired gastrulation of mouse embryos. Genes Dev 1994; 8 : 2466–77. [Google Scholar]
  33. Barbacci E, Michaël R, Ott MO, Breillat C, Huetz F, Cereghini S. Variant hepatocyte nuclear factor 1 is required for visceral endoderm specification. Development 1999; 126 : 4795–805. [Google Scholar]
  34. Martinez Barbera JP, Clements M, Thomas P, et al. The homeobox gene Hex is required in definitive endodermal tissues for normal forebrain, liver and thyroid formation. Development 2000; 127 : 2433–45. [Google Scholar]
  35. Jaenish R. DNA methylation and imprinting: why bother? Trends Genet 1997; 13 : 323–9. [Google Scholar]
  36. Epstein CJ, Smith S, Travis B, Tucker G. Both X chromosomes function before visible X-chromosome inactivation in female mouse embryos. Nature 1978; 274 : 500–3. [Google Scholar]
  37. Monk M, Harper MI. Sequential X chromosome inactivation coupled with cellular differentiation in early mouse embryos. Nature 1979; 281 : 311–3. [Google Scholar]
  38. Tam PPL, Gad JM, Kinder SJ, Tsang TE, Behringer RR. Morphogenetic tissue movement and the establishment of body plan during development from blastocyst to gastrula in the mouse. Bioessays 2001; 23 : 508–17. [Google Scholar]
  39. Gu Z, Nomura M, Simpson BB, et al. The type I activin receptor ActRIB is required for egg cylinder organization and gastrulation in the mouse. Genes Dev 1998; 12 : 844–57. [Google Scholar]
  40. Zhou X, Sasaki H, Lowe L, Hogan BL, Kuehn MR. Nodal is a novel TGF-beta-like gene expressed in the mouse node during gastrulation. Nature 1993; 361 : 543–7. [Google Scholar]
  41. Conlon FL, Lyons KM, Takaesu N, et al. A primary requirement for nodal in the formation and maintenance of the primitive streak in the mouse. Development 1994; 120 : 1919–28. [Google Scholar]
  42. Cibelli, JB, Kiessling AA, Cunniff K, Richards C, Lanza R, West M. Somatic cell nuclear transfer in humans: pronuclear and early embryonic development. J Regen Med 2001; 2 : 25–31. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.