Free Access
Med Sci (Paris)
Volume 17, Number 11, Novembre 2001
Page(s) 1105 - 1111
Section Articles de Synthèse
Published online 15 November 2001
  1. Ahmed R, Gray D. Immunological memory and protective immunity : understanding their relation. Science 1996; 272 : 54–60. [Google Scholar]
  2. Lau LL, Jamieson BD, Somasundaram T, Ahmed R. Cytotoxic T-cell memory without antigen. Nature 1994; 369 : 648–52. [Google Scholar]
  3. Murali-Krishna K, Altman JD, Suresh M, et al. Counting antigen-specific CD8 T cells : a reevaluation of bystander activation during viral infection. Immunity 1998; 8 : 177–87. [Google Scholar]
  4. Dubois PM, Pihlgren M, Tomkowiak M, Van Mechelen M, Marvel J. Tolerant CD8 T cells induced by multiple injections of peptide antigen show impaired TCR signaling and altered proliferative responses in vitro and in vivo. J Immunol 1998; 161 : 5260–7. [Google Scholar]
  5. Bell EB, Sparshott SM. Interconversion of CD45R subsets of CD4 T cells in vivo. Nature 1990; 348 : 163–6. [Google Scholar]
  6. Budd RC, Cerottini JC, MacDonald HR. Phenotypic identification of memory cytolytic T lymphocytes in a subset of Lyt-2+ cells. J Immunol 1987; 138 : 1009–13. [Google Scholar]
  7. Walunas TL, Bruce DS, Dustin L, Loh DY, Bluestone JA. Ly-6C is a marker of memory CD8+ T cells. J Immunol 1995; 155 : 1873–83. [Google Scholar]
  8. Beverley PC. Human T cell subsets. Immunol Lett 1987; 14 : 263–7. [Google Scholar]
  9. Tanchot C, Guillaume S, Delon J, et al. Modifications of CD8+ T cell function during in vivo memory or tolerance induction. Immunity 1998; 8 : 581–90. [Google Scholar]
  10. Bachmann MF, Barner M, Viola A, Kopf M. Distinct kinetics of cytokine production and cytolysis in effector and memory T cells after viral infection. Eur J Immunol 1999; 29: 291–9. [Google Scholar]
  11. Cho BK, Wang C, Sugawa S, Eisen HN, Chen J. Functional differences between memory and naive CD8 T cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999; 96 : 2976–81. [Google Scholar]
  12. Pihlgren M, Arpin C, Walzer T, et al. Memory CD44int CD8 T cells show increased proliferative responses and IFNy production following antigenic challenge in vitro. Int Immunol 1999; 11: 699–706. [Google Scholar]
  13. Zimmermann C, Prevost-Blondel A, Blaser C, Pircher H. Kinetics of the response of naive and memory CD8 T cells to antigen : similarities and differences. Eur J Immunol 1999; 29 : 284–90. [Google Scholar]
  14. Walzer T, Joubert G, Dubois PM, et al. Characterization at the single-cell level of naive and primed CD8 T cell cytokine responses. Cell Immunol 2000; 206: 16–25. [Google Scholar]
  15. Pihlgren M, Dubois P, Tomkowiak M, Sjögren T, Marvel J. Resting memory CD8+ T cells are hyperreactive to antigenic challenge in vitro. J Exp Med 1996; 184: 2141–51. [Google Scholar]
  16. Curtsinger JM, Lins DC, Mescher MF. CD8+ memory T cells (CD44high, Ly-6C+) are more sensitive than naive cells to (CD44low, Ly-6C) to TCR/CD8 signaling in response to antigen. J Immunol 1998; 160 : 3236–43. [Google Scholar]
  17. Sallusto F, Lenig D, Forster R, Lipp M, Lanzavecchia A. Two subsets of memory T lymphocytes with distinct homing potentials and effector functions. Nature 1999; 401: 708–12. [Google Scholar]
  18. Lanzavecchia A, Sallusto F. Dynamics of T lymphocyte responses : intermediates, effectors, and memory cells. Science 2000; 290: 92–7. [Google Scholar]
  19. Masopust D, Vezys V, Marzo AL, Lefrançois L. Preferential localization of effector memory cells in nonlymphoid tissue. Science 2001; 291: 2413–7. [Google Scholar]
  20. Murali-Krishna K, Ahmed R. Cutting edge : naive T cells masquerading as memory cells. J Immunol 2000; 165: 1733–7. [Google Scholar]
  21. Kambayashi T, Assarsson E, Michaelsson J, et al. Emergence of CD8+ T cells expressing NK cell receptors in influenza A virusinfected mice. J Immunol 2000; 165 : 4964–9. [Google Scholar]
  22. Surh CD, Sprent J. Homeostatic T cell proliferation : how far can T cells be activated to self-ligands ? J Exp Med 2000; 192 : F9-F14. [Google Scholar]
  23. Anfossi N, Pascal V, Vivier E, Ugolini S. Biology of Tm1 cells. Immunol Rev 2001; 181 (sous presse). [Google Scholar]
  24. Ugolini S, Arpin C, Anfossi N, et al. Involvement of NKRs in the survival of Tm1 cells, a NKR+ subset of memory-phenotype CD8+ T cells. Nat Immunol 2001; 2 : 430–5. [Google Scholar]
  25. Jacob J, Baltimore D. Modelling T-cell memory by genetic marking of memory T cells in vivo. Nature 1999; 399 : 593–7. [Google Scholar]
  26. Opferman JT, Ober BT, Ashton-Rickardt PG. Linear differentiation of cytotoxic effectors into memory T lymphocytes. Science 1999; 283 : 1745–8. [Google Scholar]
  27. van Stipdonk MJB, Lemmens EE, Schoenberger SP. Naïve CTLs require a single brief period of antigenic stimulation for clonal expansion and differentiation. Nat Immunol 2001; 2 : 423–9. [Google Scholar]
  28. Kaech SM, Ahmed R. Memory CD8+ T cell differentiation : initial antigen encounter triggers a developmental program in naïve cells. Nat Immunol 2001; 2 : 415–22. [Google Scholar]
  29. Huang LR, Chen FL, Chen YT, Lin YM, Kung JT. Potent induction of long-term CD8+ T cell memory by short-term IL-4 exposure during T cell receptor stimulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000; 97 : 3406–11. [Google Scholar]
  30. Rathmell JC, Vander Heiden MG, Harris MH, Frauwirth KA, Thompson CB. In the absence of extrinsic signals, nutrient utilization by lymphocytes is insufficient to maintain either cell size or viability. Mol Cell 2000; 6 : 683–92. [Google Scholar]
  31. Cho BK, Rao VP, Ge Q, Eisen HN, Chen J. Homeostasis-stimulated proliferation drives naive T cells to differentiate directly into memory T cells. J Exp Med 2000; 192 : 549–56. [Google Scholar]
  32. Goldrath AW, Bogatzki LY, Bevan MJ. Naive T cells transiently acquire a memorylike phenotype during homeostasis-driven proliferation. J Exp Med 2000; 192 : 557–64. [Google Scholar]
  33. Ku CC, Murakami M, Sakamoto A, et al. Control of homeostasis of CD8+ memory T cells by opposing cytokines. Science 2000; 288 : 675–8. [Google Scholar]
  34. Tan JT, Dudl E, Leroy E, et al. IL-7 is critical for homeostatic proliferation and survival of naive T cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001; 98 : 8732–7. [Google Scholar]
  35. Schluns KS, Kieper WC, Jameson SC, Lefrancois L. Interleukin-7 mediates the homeostasis of naive and memory CD8 T cells in vivo. Nat Immunol 2000; 1 : 426–32. [Google Scholar]
  36. Goldrath AW, Bevan MJ. Low-affinity ligands for the TCR drive proliferation of mature CD8+ T cells in lymphopenic hosts. Immunity 1999; 11 : 183–90. [Google Scholar]
  37. Ernst B, Lee DS, Chang JM, Sprent J, Surh CD. The peptide ligands mediating positive selection in the thymus control T cell survival and homeostatic proliferation in the periphery. Immunity 1999; 11 : 173–81. [Google Scholar]
  38. Yajima T, Nishimura H, Ishimitsu R, et al. Memory phenotype CD8(+) T cells in IL-15 transgenic mice are involved in early protection against a primary infection with Listeria monocytogenes. Eur J Immunol 2001; 31 : 757–66. [Google Scholar]
  39. Tsunobuchi H, Nishimura H, Goshima F, et al. Memory-type CD8+ T cells protect IL-2 receptor alpha-deficient mice from systemic infection with herpes simplex virus type 2. J Immunol 2000; 165 : 4552–60. [Google Scholar]
  40. Kundig TM, Bachmann MF, Oehen S, et al. On the role of antigen in maintaining cytotoxic T-cell memory. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996; 93 : 9716–23. [Google Scholar]
  41. Selin LK, Welsh RM. Cytolytically active memory CTL present in lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus immune mice after clearance of virus infection. J Immunol 1997; 158 : 5366–73. [Google Scholar]
  42. Murali-Krishna K, Lau LL, Sambhara S, et al. Persistence of memory CD8 T cells in MHC class I-deficient mice. Science 1999; 286 : 1377–81. [Google Scholar]
  43. Tanchot C, Lemonnier FA, Perarnau B, Freitas AA, Rocha B. Differential requirements for survival and proliferation of CD8 naive or memory T cells. Science 1997; 276 : 2057–62. [Google Scholar]
  44. Lodolce JP, Boone DL, Chai S, et al. IL-15 receptor maintains lymphoid homeostasis by supporting lymphocyte homing and proliferation. Immunity 1998; 9 : 669–76. [Google Scholar]
  45. Kennedy MK, Glaccum M, Brown SN, et al. Reversible defects in natural killer and memory CD8 T cell lineages in interleukin 15-deficient mice. J Exp Med 2000; 191 : 771–80. [Google Scholar]
  46. Zhang X, Sun S, Hwang I, et al. Potent and selective stimulation of memory-phenotype CD8+ T cells in vivo by IL-15. Immunity 1998; 8 : 591–9. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.