Accès gratuit
Med Sci (Paris)
Volume 17, Numéro 11, Novembre 2001
Page(s) 1105 - 1111
Section Articles de Synthèse
Publié en ligne 15 novembre 2001
  1. Ahmed R, Gray D. Immunological memory and protective immunity : understanding their relation. Science 1996; 272 : 54–60.
  2. Lau LL, Jamieson BD, Somasundaram T, Ahmed R. Cytotoxic T-cell memory without antigen. Nature 1994; 369 : 648–52.
  3. Murali-Krishna K, Altman JD, Suresh M, et al. Counting antigen-specific CD8 T cells : a reevaluation of bystander activation during viral infection. Immunity 1998; 8 : 177–87.
  4. Dubois PM, Pihlgren M, Tomkowiak M, Van Mechelen M, Marvel J. Tolerant CD8 T cells induced by multiple injections of peptide antigen show impaired TCR signaling and altered proliferative responses in vitro and in vivo. J Immunol 1998; 161 : 5260–7.
  5. Bell EB, Sparshott SM. Interconversion of CD45R subsets of CD4 T cells in vivo. Nature 1990; 348 : 163–6.
  6. Budd RC, Cerottini JC, MacDonald HR. Phenotypic identification of memory cytolytic T lymphocytes in a subset of Lyt-2+ cells. J Immunol 1987; 138 : 1009–13.
  7. Walunas TL, Bruce DS, Dustin L, Loh DY, Bluestone JA. Ly-6C is a marker of memory CD8+ T cells. J Immunol 1995; 155 : 1873–83.
  8. Beverley PC. Human T cell subsets. Immunol Lett 1987; 14 : 263–7.
  9. Tanchot C, Guillaume S, Delon J, et al. Modifications of CD8+ T cell function during in vivo memory or tolerance induction. Immunity 1998; 8 : 581–90.
  10. Bachmann MF, Barner M, Viola A, Kopf M. Distinct kinetics of cytokine production and cytolysis in effector and memory T cells after viral infection. Eur J Immunol 1999; 29: 291–9.
  11. Cho BK, Wang C, Sugawa S, Eisen HN, Chen J. Functional differences between memory and naive CD8 T cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999; 96 : 2976–81.
  12. Pihlgren M, Arpin C, Walzer T, et al. Memory CD44int CD8 T cells show increased proliferative responses and IFNy production following antigenic challenge in vitro. Int Immunol 1999; 11: 699–706.
  13. Zimmermann C, Prevost-Blondel A, Blaser C, Pircher H. Kinetics of the response of naive and memory CD8 T cells to antigen : similarities and differences. Eur J Immunol 1999; 29 : 284–90.
  14. Walzer T, Joubert G, Dubois PM, et al. Characterization at the single-cell level of naive and primed CD8 T cell cytokine responses. Cell Immunol 2000; 206: 16–25.
  15. Pihlgren M, Dubois P, Tomkowiak M, Sjögren T, Marvel J. Resting memory CD8+ T cells are hyperreactive to antigenic challenge in vitro. J Exp Med 1996; 184: 2141–51.
  16. Curtsinger JM, Lins DC, Mescher MF. CD8+ memory T cells (CD44high, Ly-6C+) are more sensitive than naive cells to (CD44low, Ly-6C) to TCR/CD8 signaling in response to antigen. J Immunol 1998; 160 : 3236–43.
  17. Sallusto F, Lenig D, Forster R, Lipp M, Lanzavecchia A. Two subsets of memory T lymphocytes with distinct homing potentials and effector functions. Nature 1999; 401: 708–12.
  18. Lanzavecchia A, Sallusto F. Dynamics of T lymphocyte responses : intermediates, effectors, and memory cells. Science 2000; 290: 92–7.
  19. Masopust D, Vezys V, Marzo AL, Lefrançois L. Preferential localization of effector memory cells in nonlymphoid tissue. Science 2001; 291: 2413–7.
  20. Murali-Krishna K, Ahmed R. Cutting edge : naive T cells masquerading as memory cells. J Immunol 2000; 165: 1733–7.
  21. Kambayashi T, Assarsson E, Michaelsson J, et al. Emergence of CD8+ T cells expressing NK cell receptors in influenza A virusinfected mice. J Immunol 2000; 165 : 4964–9.
  22. Surh CD, Sprent J. Homeostatic T cell proliferation : how far can T cells be activated to self-ligands ? J Exp Med 2000; 192 : F9-F14.
  23. Anfossi N, Pascal V, Vivier E, Ugolini S. Biology of Tm1 cells. Immunol Rev 2001; 181 (sous presse).
  24. Ugolini S, Arpin C, Anfossi N, et al. Involvement of NKRs in the survival of Tm1 cells, a NKR+ subset of memory-phenotype CD8+ T cells. Nat Immunol 2001; 2 : 430–5.
  25. Jacob J, Baltimore D. Modelling T-cell memory by genetic marking of memory T cells in vivo. Nature 1999; 399 : 593–7.
  26. Opferman JT, Ober BT, Ashton-Rickardt PG. Linear differentiation of cytotoxic effectors into memory T lymphocytes. Science 1999; 283 : 1745–8.
  27. van Stipdonk MJB, Lemmens EE, Schoenberger SP. Naïve CTLs require a single brief period of antigenic stimulation for clonal expansion and differentiation. Nat Immunol 2001; 2 : 423–9.
  28. Kaech SM, Ahmed R. Memory CD8+ T cell differentiation : initial antigen encounter triggers a developmental program in naïve cells. Nat Immunol 2001; 2 : 415–22.
  29. Huang LR, Chen FL, Chen YT, Lin YM, Kung JT. Potent induction of long-term CD8+ T cell memory by short-term IL-4 exposure during T cell receptor stimulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000; 97 : 3406–11.
  30. Rathmell JC, Vander Heiden MG, Harris MH, Frauwirth KA, Thompson CB. In the absence of extrinsic signals, nutrient utilization by lymphocytes is insufficient to maintain either cell size or viability. Mol Cell 2000; 6 : 683–92.
  31. Cho BK, Rao VP, Ge Q, Eisen HN, Chen J. Homeostasis-stimulated proliferation drives naive T cells to differentiate directly into memory T cells. J Exp Med 2000; 192 : 549–56.
  32. Goldrath AW, Bogatzki LY, Bevan MJ. Naive T cells transiently acquire a memorylike phenotype during homeostasis-driven proliferation. J Exp Med 2000; 192 : 557–64.
  33. Ku CC, Murakami M, Sakamoto A, et al. Control of homeostasis of CD8+ memory T cells by opposing cytokines. Science 2000; 288 : 675–8.
  34. Tan JT, Dudl E, Leroy E, et al. IL-7 is critical for homeostatic proliferation and survival of naive T cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001; 98 : 8732–7.
  35. Schluns KS, Kieper WC, Jameson SC, Lefrancois L. Interleukin-7 mediates the homeostasis of naive and memory CD8 T cells in vivo. Nat Immunol 2000; 1 : 426–32.
  36. Goldrath AW, Bevan MJ. Low-affinity ligands for the TCR drive proliferation of mature CD8+ T cells in lymphopenic hosts. Immunity 1999; 11 : 183–90.
  37. Ernst B, Lee DS, Chang JM, Sprent J, Surh CD. The peptide ligands mediating positive selection in the thymus control T cell survival and homeostatic proliferation in the periphery. Immunity 1999; 11 : 173–81.
  38. Yajima T, Nishimura H, Ishimitsu R, et al. Memory phenotype CD8(+) T cells in IL-15 transgenic mice are involved in early protection against a primary infection with Listeria monocytogenes. Eur J Immunol 2001; 31 : 757–66.
  39. Tsunobuchi H, Nishimura H, Goshima F, et al. Memory-type CD8+ T cells protect IL-2 receptor alpha-deficient mice from systemic infection with herpes simplex virus type 2. J Immunol 2000; 165 : 4552–60.
  40. Kundig TM, Bachmann MF, Oehen S, et al. On the role of antigen in maintaining cytotoxic T-cell memory. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996; 93 : 9716–23.
  41. Selin LK, Welsh RM. Cytolytically active memory CTL present in lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus immune mice after clearance of virus infection. J Immunol 1997; 158 : 5366–73.
  42. Murali-Krishna K, Lau LL, Sambhara S, et al. Persistence of memory CD8 T cells in MHC class I-deficient mice. Science 1999; 286 : 1377–81.
  43. Tanchot C, Lemonnier FA, Perarnau B, Freitas AA, Rocha B. Differential requirements for survival and proliferation of CD8 naive or memory T cells. Science 1997; 276 : 2057–62.
  44. Lodolce JP, Boone DL, Chai S, et al. IL-15 receptor maintains lymphoid homeostasis by supporting lymphocyte homing and proliferation. Immunity 1998; 9 : 669–76.
  45. Kennedy MK, Glaccum M, Brown SN, et al. Reversible defects in natural killer and memory CD8 T cell lineages in interleukin 15-deficient mice. J Exp Med 2000; 191 : 771–80.
  46. Zhang X, Sun S, Hwang I, et al. Potent and selective stimulation of memory-phenotype CD8+ T cells in vivo by IL-15. Immunity 1998; 8 : 591–9.

Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.

Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.

Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.