EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
Home All issues Volume 41 / No 1 (Janvier 2025) Med Sci (Paris), 41 1 (2025) 63-67 References
Open Access
Issue
Med Sci (Paris)
Volume 41, Number 1, Janvier 2025
Page(s) 63 - 67
Section Repères
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/medsci/2024189
Published online 31 January 2025
  1. Sarradon-Eck A, Mancini J, Genre D, et al. Que signifie pour les participants la notion de résultats d’un essai thérapeutique ? Med Sci (Paris) 2012 ; 28 : 33–6. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. WMA - Association Médicale Mondiale. Déclaration d’Helsinki de l’AMM - Principes éthiques applicables à la recherche médicale impliquant des êtres humains, https://www.wma.net/fr/policies-post/declaration-dhelsinki-de-lamm-principes-ethiques-applicables-a-la-recherche-medicale-impliquant-des-etres-humains/. [Google Scholar]
  3. International Ethical Guidelines for Health-related Research Involving Humans. Prepared by the Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS) in collaboration with the World Health Organization (WHO), 2016. https://cioms.ch/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/WEB-CIOMS-EthicalGuidelines.pdf [Google Scholar]
  4. Mckeown RE, Weed DL, Kahn P, Stoto MA. American College of Epidemiology Ethics Guidelines : Foundations and Dissemination. 2003 ; 9 : 207–14. [Google Scholar]
  5. International Concil for Harmonisation of technical requirements for pharmaceuticals for human use. ICH Harmonised Guideline on Good Clinical Pratice (GCP) E6 (R3). 2023 May 19. [Google Scholar]
  6. Bruhn H, Cowan E-J, Campbell MK, et al. Providing trial results to participants in phase III pragmatic effectiveness RCTs: a scoping review. Trials 2021 ; 22 : 361 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kisiangani I, Mohamed SF, Kyobutungi C, et al. Perspectives on returning individual and aggregate genomic research results to study participants and communities in Kenya: a qualitative study. BMC Med Ethics 2022 ; 23 : 27. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dal-Ré R, Caplan AL, Holm S, et al. Adequate information about clinical trial results must be given to participants. Nat Med 2024 May 8. doi: 10.1038/s41591-024-02948-1 [Google Scholar]
  9. Holzer K, Culhane-Pera KA, Straka RJ, et al. Hmong participants’ reactions to return of individual and community pharmacogenetic research results: “A positive light for our community” J Community Genet 2021 ; 12 : 53–65. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ziegenfuss JY, Shah ND, Deming JR, et al. Offering results to participants in a diabetes survey: Effects on survey response rates. Patient 2011 ; 4 : 241–5. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Beskow LM, Burke W, Fullerton SM, Sharp RR. Offering aggregate results to participants in genomic research: Opportunities and challenges. Genet Med 2012 ; 14 : 490–6 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Dalal H, Wingham J, Pritchard C, et al. Communicating the results of research: How do participants of a cardiac rehabilitation RCT prefer to be informed? Heal Expect 2010 ; 13 : 323–30. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Partridge AH, Wolff AC, Marcom PK, et al. The impact of sharing results of a randomized breast cancer clinical trial with study participants. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2009 ; 115 : 123–9. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Dorsey ER, Beck CA, Adams M, et al. Communicating clinical trial results to research participants. Arch Neurol 2008 ; 65 : 1590–5. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Fernandez CV, Gao J, Strahlendorf C, et al. Providing research results to participants: Attitudes and needs of adolescents and parents of children with cancer. J Clin Oncol 2009 ; 27 : 878–83. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Snowdon C, Garcia J, Elbourne D. Reactions of participants to the results of a randomised controlled trial: Exploratory study. Br Med J 1998 ; 317 : 21–6. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Dixon-Woods M, Tarrant C, Jackson CJ, et al. Providing the results of research to participants: A mixed-method study of the benefits and challenges of a consultative approach. Clin Trials 2011 ; 8 : 330–41. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Graham M, Farina F, Ritchie CW, et al. Fear of Dementia and the Obligation to Provide Aggregate Research Results to Study Participants. Camb Q Healthc Ethics 2022 ; 31 : 498–505. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Purvis RS, Long CR, Eisenberg LR, et al. First Do No Harm: Ethical Concerns of Health Researchers That Discourage the Sharing of Results With Research Participants. AJOB Empir Bioeth 2020 ; 11 : 104–13. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. European commission. Guidance note - Potential misuse of research, 2021 : 1–4. https://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tenders/opportunities/docs/2021-2027/horizon/guidance/guidance-note-potential-misuse-of-research-results_he_en.pdf [Google Scholar]
  21. CNIL. Le règlement général sur la protection des données, 24 mai 2016. https://www.cnil.fr/fr/reglement-europeen-protection-donnees [Google Scholar]
  22. Daneshjou R, Shmuylovich L, Grada A, Horsley V. Research Techniques Made Simple: Scientific Communication using Twitter. J Invest Dermatol 2021 ; 141 : 1615–21.e1. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. McElfish PA, Long CR, James LP, et al. Characterizing health researcher barriers to sharing results with study participants. J Clin Transl Sci 2019 ; 3 : 295–301. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Shalowitz DI, Miller FG. Communicating the results of clinical research to participants: Attitudes, practices, and future directions. PLoS Med 2008 ; 5 : 714–20. [Google Scholar]
  25. MacNeil SD, Fernandez CV. Attitudes of research ethics board chairs towards disclosure of research results to participants: Results of a national survey. J Med Ethics 2007 ; 33 : 549–53. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. MacNeil SD, Fernandez CV. Informing research participants of research results: Analysis of Canadian university based research ethics board policies. J Med Ethics 2006 ; 32 : 49–54. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Westo S, Adhkari B, Thriemer K. Sharing results with participants (and community) in malaria related research: Perspectives and experience from researchers. PLOS Glob Public Health 2023 ; 3 : e0002062. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Fernandez CV, Ruccione K, Wells RJ, et al. Recommendations for the return of research results to study participants and guardians: A report from the Children’s Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol 2012 ; 30 : 4573–9. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Long CR, Stewart MK, McElfish PA. Health research participants are not receiving research results: A collaborative solution is needed. Trials 2017 ; 18 : 449. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Mfutso-Bengo J, Ndebele P, Masiye F. Disseminating research results to research participants and their communities. Malawi Med J 2008 ; 20 : 64–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.