EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
Home All issues Volume 38 / No 1 (Janvier 2022) Med Sci (Paris), 38 1 (2022) 75-80 References
Exposome
Open Access
Issue
Med Sci (Paris)
Volume 38, Number 1, Janvier 2022
Exposome
Page(s) 75 - 80
Section M/S Revues
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/medsci/2021149
Published online 21 January 2022
  1. Robinson O, Tamayo I, de Castro M, et al. The Urban Exposome during Pregnancy and Its Socioeconomic Determinants. Environ Health Perspect 2018 ; 126 : 077005. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Wild CP. Complementing the genome with an exposome: the outstanding challenge of environmental exposure measurement in molecular epidemiology. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 2005 ; 14 : 1847–1850. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Fairburn J, Schüle SA, Dreger S, et al. Social inequalities in exposure to ambient air pollution: a systematic review in the WHO European region. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2019 ; 16 [Google Scholar]
  4. Hajat A, Hsia C, O’Neill MS. Socioeconomic disparities and air pollution exposure: a global review. Curr Environ Health Rep 2015 ; 2 : 440–450. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Rotko T, Kousa A, Alm S, et al. Exposures to nitrogen dioxide in EXPOLIS-Helsinki: microenvironment, behavioral and sociodemographic factors. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol 2001 ; 11 : 216–223. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Samoli E, Stergiopoulou A, Santana P, et al. Spatial variability in air pollution exposure in relation to socioeconomic indicators in nine European metropolitan areas: A study on environmental inequality. Environ Pollut Barking Essex 2019 ; 249 : 345–353. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fecht D, Fischer P, Fortunato L, et al. Associations between air pollution and socioeconomic characteristics, ethnicity and age profile of neighbourhoods in England and the Netherlands. Environ Pollut Barking Essex 1987 ; 2015 : 198201–210. [Google Scholar]
  8. García-Marcos L, Guillén JJ, Dinwiddie R, et al. The relative importance of socio-economic status, parental smoking and air pollution (SO2) on asthma symptoms, spirometry and bronchodilator response in 11-year-old children. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 1999 ; 10 : 96–100. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Ferguson L, Taylor J, Davies M, et al. Exposure to indoor air pollution across socio-economic groups in high-income countries: a scoping review of the literature and a modelling methodology. Environ Int 2020; 143 : 105748. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Son B, Breysse P, Yang W. Volatile organic compounds concentrations in residential indoor and outdoor and its personal exposure in Korea. Environ Int 2003 ; 29 : 79–85. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Byun H, Bae H, Kim D, et al. Effects of socioeconomic factors and human activities on children’s PM(10) exposure in inner-city households in Korea. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2010 ; 83 : 867–878. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Brown T, Dassonville C, Derbez M, et al. Relationships between socioeconomic and lifestyle factors and indoor air quality in French dwellings. Environ Res 2015 ; 140 : 385–396. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Esplugues A, Ballester F, Estarlich M, et al. Indoor and outdoor concentrations and determinants of NO2 in a cohort of 1-year-old children in Valencia. Spain. Indoor Air 2010 ; 20 : 213–223. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Zota A, Adamkiewicz G, Levy JI, et al. Ventilation in public housing: implications for indoor nitrogen dioxide concentrations. Indoor Air 2005 ; 15 : 393–401. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Dreger S, Schüle SA, Hilz LK, et al. Social inequalities in environmental noise exposure: a review of evidence in the WHO European region. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2019 ; 16 [Google Scholar]
  16. Méline J, Van Hulst A, Thomas F, et al. Transportation noise and annoyance related to road traffic in the French RECORD study. Int J Health Geogr 2013 ; 12 : 44. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Riedel N, Scheiner J, Müller G, et al. Assessing the relationship between objective and subjective indicators of residential exposure to road traffic noise in the context of environmental justice. J Environ Plan Manag 2014 ; 57 : 1398–1421. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Verbeek T.. Unequal residential exposure to air pollution and noise: a geospatial environmental justice analysis for Ghent, Belgium. SSM – Popul. Health 2019 ; 7 : 100340. [Google Scholar]
  19. Carrier M, Apparicio P, Séguin A-M. Road traffic noise geography during the night in Montreal: An environmental equity assessment. Can Geogr 2016 ; 60 : 394–405. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Casey JA, Morello-Frosch R, Mennitt DJ, et al. Race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, residential segregation, and spatial variation in noise exposure in the contiguous United States. Environ Health Perspect 2017 ; 125 : 077017. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Huang G, Zhou W, Cadenasso ML. Is everyone hot in the city? Spatial pattern of land surface temperatures, land cover and neighborhood socioeconomic characteristics in Baltimore, MD. J Environ Manage 2011 ; 92 : 1753–1759. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Harlan SL, Brazel AJ, Prashad L, et al. Neighborhood microclimates and vulnerability to heat stress. Soc Sci Med 2006 ; 63 : 2847–2863. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Basara JB, Basara HG, Illston BG, et al. The Impact of the Urban heat island during an intense heat wave in Oklahoma City. Adv Meteorol 2010 ; 2010 : e230365. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Schüle SA, Hilz LK, Dreger S, et al. Social inequalities in environmental resources of green and blue spaces: a review of evidence in the WHO European region. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2019 ; 16 [Google Scholar]
  25. Wüstemann H, Kalisch D, Kolbe J. Accessibility of urban blue in German major cities. Ecological Indicators 2017 ; 78 : 125–130. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Laatikainen T, Tenkanen H, Kyttä M, et al. Comparing conventional and PPGIS approaches in measuring equality of access to urban aquatic environments. Landsc Urban Plan 2015 ; 144 : 22–33. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Rigolon A.. Parks and young people: an environmental justice study of park proximity, acreage, and quality in Denver. Colorado. Landsc Urban Plan 2017 ; 165 : 73–83. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Wen M, Zhang X, Harris CD, et al. Spatial disparities in the distribution of parks and green spaces in the USA. Ann Behav Med Publ Soc Behav Med 2013 ; 45 : 18–27. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Mavoa S, Koohsari MJ, Badland HM, et al. Area-level disparities of public open space: a geographic information systems analysis in metropolitan Melbourne. Urban Policy Res 2015 ; 33 : 306–323. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Astell-Burt T, Feng X, Mavoa S, et al. Do low-income neighbourhoods have the least green space? A cross-sectional study of Australia’s most populous cities. BMC Public Health 2014 ; 14 : 292. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Pham TTH, Apparicio P, Séguin A-M, et al. Spatial distribution of vegetation in Montreal: an uneven distribution or environmental inequity?. Landsc Urban Plan 2012 ; 107 : 214–224. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. Casey JA, James P, Cushing L, et al. Race, ethnicity, income concentration and 10-year change in urban greenness in the United States. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2017 ; 14 : 1546. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. Llop S, Ballester F, Estarlich M, et al. Social factors associated with nitrogen dioxide (NO2) exposure during pregnancy: the INMA-Valencia project in Spain. Soc Sci Med 1982 ; 2011; 72: 890–898. [Google Scholar]
  34. Ouidir M, Lepeule J, Siroux V, et al. Is atmospheric pollution exposure during pregnancy associated with individual and contextual characteristics? A nationwide study in France. J Epidemiol Community Health 2017 ; 71 : 1026–1036. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Goodman A, Wilkinson P, Stafford M, et al. Characterising socio-economic inequalities in exposure to air pollution: a comparison of socio-economic markers and scales of measurement. Health Place 2011 ; 17 : 767–774. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Vrijheid M, Martinez D, Aguilera I, et al. Socioeconomic status and exposure to multiple environmental pollutants during pregnancy: evidence for environmental inequity?. J Epidemiol Community Health 2012 ; 66 : 106–113. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Malmqvist E, Rignell-Hydbom A, Tinnerberg H, et al. Maternal exposure to air pollution and birth outcomes. Environ Health Perspect 2011 ; 119 : 553–558. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Chaix B, Gustafsson S, Jerrett M, et al. Children’s exposure to nitrogen dioxide in Sweden: investigating environmental injustice in an egalitarian country. J Epidemiol Community Health 2006 ; 60 : 234–241. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Ferrero A, Esplugues A, Estarlich M, et al. Infants’ indoor and outdoor residential exposure to benzene and respiratory health in a Spanish cohort. Environ Pollut Barking Essex 2017 ; 222 : 486–494. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. Neidell MJ. Air pollution, health, and socio-economic status: the effect of outdoor air quality on childhood asthma. J Health Econ 2004 ; 23 : 1209–1236. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Soliman S, Pollack HA, Warner KE. Decrease in the prevalence of environmental tobacco smoke exposure in the home during the 1990s in families with children. Am J Public Health 2004 ; 94 : 314–320. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Berman BA, Wong GC, Bastani R, et al. Household smoking behavior and ETS exposure among children with asthma in low-income, minority households. Addict Behav 2003 ; 28 : 111–128. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Bolte G, Fromme H, for the GME Study Group. Socioeconomic determinants of children’s environmental tobacco smoke exposure and family’s home smoking policy. Eur J Public Health 2009; 19 : 52–8. [Google Scholar]
  44. Ulbricht S, Holdys J, Meyer C, et al. Predictors of indoor smoking at young children’s homes: a cross-sectional study. Eur J Pediatr 2014 ; 173 : 1187–1191. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Raisamo SU, Doku DT, Heloma A, et al. Persistence of socioeconomic differences in adolescents’ environmental tobacco smoke exposure in Finland: 1991–2009. Scand J Public Health 2014 ; 42 : 184–193. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Kihal-Talantikite W, Padilla CM, Lalloue B, et al. An exploratory spatial analysis to assess the relationship between deprivation, noise and infant mortality: an ecological study. Environ Health Glob Access Sci Source 2013 ; 12 : 109. [Google Scholar]
  47. Kihal-Talantikite W, Padilla CM, Lalloué B, et al. Green space, social inequalities and neonatal mortality in France. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2013 ; 13 : 191. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Schikowski T, Sugiri D, Reimann V, et al. Contribution of smoking and air pollution exposure in urban areas to social differences in respiratory health. BMC Public Health 2008 ; 8 : 179. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Bell ML, Dominici F. Effect modification by community characteristics on the short-term effects of ozone exposure and mortality in 98 US communities. Am J Epidemiol 2008 ; 167 : 986–997. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Forastiere F, Stafoggia M, Tasco C, et al. Socioeconomic status, particulate air pollution, and daily mortality: differential exposure or differential susceptibility. Am J Ind Med 2007 ; 50 : 208–216. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.