EDP Sciences logo
Authentification abonné
Rechercher
Menu
Accueil Tous les numéros Volume 38 / Numéro 1 (Janvier 2022) Med Sci (Paris), 38 1 (2022) 38-44 Références
Accès gratuit
Numéro
Med Sci (Paris)
Volume 38, Numéro 1, Janvier 2022
Page(s) 38 - 44
Section M/S Revues
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/medsci/2021243
Publié en ligne 21 janvier 2022
  1. Favre P, Maquer G, Henderson A, et al. In Silico Clinical Trials in the Orthopedic Device Industry : From Fantasy to Reality? Ann Biomed Eng 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-021-02787-y. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Wade SW, Strader C, Fitzpatrick LA, et al. Estimating prevalence of osteoporosis : examples from industrialized countries. Arch Osteoporos 2014; 9 : 182. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ben-Shlomo Y, Blom A, Boulton C, et al. The National Joint Registry 17th Annual Report 2020. London 2020. [Google Scholar]
  4. Erens GA, Thornhill TS, Katz JN. Total hip arthroplasty. UpToDate 2016. [Google Scholar]
  5. Fennema P, Achakri H. Getting your devices ready for MDR compliance–a clinical approach and orthopaedic device manufacturers’perspective. AboutOpen 2019 ; 5 : 70–75. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Regulation. (EU) 2017/745 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2017 on medical devices, amending Directive 2001/83/EC, Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 and Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 and repealing Council Directives 90/385/EEC and 93/42/EEC. [Google Scholar]
  7. Oulharj S, Pauchot J, Tropet Y. PIP breast implant removal : a study of 828 cases. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2014; 67 : 302–7. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Clough RW. The finite element method after twenty-five years : A personal view. Computers & Structures 1980 ; 12 : 361–370. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Ostergaard MG, Ibbotson AR, Le Roux O, Prior AM. Virtual testing of aircraft structures. CEAS Aeronautical Journal 2011 ; 1 : 83–103. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Huizinga F, Van Ostaijen RAA, Van Oosten Slingeland A. A practical approach to virtual testing in automotive engineering. J Eng Design 2002; 13 : 33–47. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Huiskes R, Chao EY. A survey of finite element analysis in orthopedic biomechanics : the first decade. J Biomech 1983 ; 16 : 385–409. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. ASTM-F2996-20. Standard Practice for Finite Element Analysis (FEA) of Non-Modular Metallic Orthopaedic Hip Femoral Stems. 2020. [Google Scholar]
  13. ASTM-F3334-19. Standard Practice for Finite Element Analysis (FEA) of Metallic Orthopaedic Total Knee Tibial Components. 2019. [Google Scholar]
  14. Viceconti M, Affatato S, Baleani M, et al. Pre-clinical validation of joint prostheses : a systematic approach. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2009 ; 2 : 120–127. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Bieger R, Ignatius A, Decking R, et al. Primary stability and strain distribution of cementless hip stems as a function of implant design. Clin Biomech 2012 ; 27 : 158–164. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Shu L, Yamamoto K, Yao J, et al. A subject-specific finite element musculoskeletal framework for mechanics analysis of a total knee replacement. J Biomech 2018 ; 77 : 146–154. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Damm P, Graichen F, Rohlmann A, et al. Total hip joint prosthesis for in vivo measurement of forces and moments. Med Eng Phys 2010 ; 32 : 95–100. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Favre P, Henderson AD. Prediction of stemless humeral implant micromotion during upper limb activities. Clin Biomech 2016 ; 36 : 46–51. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Heimann T, Meinzer HP. Statistical shape models for 3D medical image segmentation : a review. Med Image Anal 2009 ; 13 : 543–563. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Al-Dirini RMA, Martelli S, O’Rourke D, et al. Virtual trial to evaluate the robustness of cementless femoral stems to patient and surgical variation. J Biomech 2019 ; 82 : 346–356. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Cook DD, Robertson DJ. The generic modeling fallacy : Average biomechanical models often produce non-average results!. J Biomech 2016 ; 49 : 3609–3615. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Martelli S, Taddei F, Cristofolini L, et al. A new hip epiphyseal prosthesis : design revision driven by a validated numerical procedure. Med Eng Phys 2011 ; 33 : 1203–1211. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR). Hip, Knee & Shoulder Arthroplasty : 2020 Annual Report, Adelaide; AOA, 2020 : 1–474. https://aoanjrr.sahmri.com/annual-reports-2020. [Google Scholar]
  24. Langohr GDG, Reeves J, Roche CP, et al. The effect of short-stem humeral component sizing on humeral bone stress. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2020; 29 : 761–7. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Favre P, Moor B, Snedeker JG, Gerber C. Influence of component positioning on impingement in conventional total shoulder arthroplasty. Clin Biomech 2008 ; 23 : 175–183. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Viceconti M, Pappalardo F, Rodriguez B, et al. In silico trials : Verification, validation and uncertainty quantification of predictive models used in the regulatory evaluation of biomedical products. Methods 2021; 185 : 120–7. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. ASME-V&V40. Assessing Credibility of Computational Modeling through Verification and Validation. 2018. [Google Scholar]
  28. Viceconti M, Juarez MA, Curreli C, et al. Credibility of In Silico Trial Technologies-A Theoretical Framing. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform 2020; 24 : 4–13. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Faris O, Shuren J. An FDA Viewpoint on Unique Considerations for Medical-Device Clinical Trials. N Engl J Med 2017 ; 376 : 1350–1357. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. FDA. Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff. Reporting of Computational Modeling Studies in Medical Device Submissions. 2016. [Google Scholar]
  31. Hailer NP. Orthopedic registry research - limitations and future perspectives. Acta Orthop 2015 ; 86 : 1–2. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Taylor M, Prendergast PJ. Four decades of finite element analysis of orthopaedic devices : where are we now and what are the opportunities?. J Biomech 2015 ; 48 : 767–778. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Malak TT, Broomfield JA, Palmer AJ, et al. Surrogate markers of long-term outcome in primary total hip arthroplasty : A systematic review. Bone Joint Res 2016 ; 5 : 206–214. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Voigt I, Inojosa H, Dillenseger A, et al. Digital Twins for Multiple Sclerosis. Front Immunol 2021; 12 : 669811. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.

Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.

Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.