EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
Home All issues Volume 35 / No 10 (Octobre 2019) Med Sci (Paris), 35 10 (2019) 787-791 References
Numérique et santé
Open Access
Issue
Med Sci (Paris)
Volume 35, Number 10, Octobre 2019
Numérique et santé
Page(s) 787 - 791
Section M/S Revues
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/medsci/2019151
Published online 18 October 2019
  1. Biclet P. Où en est-on du big data en médecine ? Médecine et Droit 2018 : 62–7. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Mamzer MF, Hervé C. En ce qui concerne les données informatisées de santé. Ethics Med Publ Health 2017 ; 3 : 3–6. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Vioulès MJ, Moulahi B, Azé J, et al. Detection of suicide-related posts in Twitter data streams. J Res Dev. 2018 ; 62 : 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  4. Auer M, Griffiths MM. Self-reported losses versus actual losses in online gambling: an empirical study. J Gambl Stud. 2017 ; 33 : 795–806. [Google Scholar]
  5. Bonnaire C. Jeux de hasard et d’argent sur internet : quels risques ? L’Encéphale. 2012 ; 38 : 42–9. [Google Scholar]
  6. Costes JM, Eroukmanoff V, Richard JB, Tovar ML. Les jeux d’argent et de hasard en France en 2014. ODJ. 2015 ; 4 : 9. [Google Scholar]
  7. Moghaddam JF, Yoon G, Dickerson DL, et al. Suicidal ideation and suicide attempts in five groups with different severities of gambling: findings from the national epidemiologic survey on alcohol and related conditions. Am J Addict. 2015 ; 24 : 292–98. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hazo JB, Prigent A, Auriol M, et al. Identification des facteurs associés au recours aux soins de santé mentale. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publ. 2017 ; 65 : 53–4. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Harries MD, Redden SA, Grant JE, An analysis of treatment-seeking behavior in individuals with gambling disorder. J Gambl Stud. 2018 ; 34 : 999–1012. [Google Scholar]
  10. Suurvali H, Cordingley J, Hodgins DC, et al., Barriers to seeking help for gambling problems : a review of the empirical literature. J Gambl Stud. 2009 ; 25 : 407–24. [Google Scholar]
  11. Caillon J, Grall-Bronnec M, Challet-Bouju G, et al., Revue systématique de la littérature évaluant l’efficacité des outils de jeu responsable existants pour les jeux de hasard et d’argent en ligne : mise au point et perspectives. Psychotropes. 2017 ; 23 : 21–40. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Luquiens A, Lagadec M, Amirouche A, et al., Repérage des joueurs de poker en ligne problématiques et pathologiques : évaluation transversale des joueurs du site de poker Winamax et construction d’un outil de dépistage en ligne. Eur Psychiat. 2014 ; 29 : 536–7. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Costes JM. Détection précoce et prise de contact avec les joueurs à risque. Paris, novembre 2016. https://www.economie.gouv.fr/files/files/directions_services/observatoire-des-jeux/synthese20161122fr.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  14. Luquiens A, Vendryes D, Aubin HJ, et al. Description and assessment of trustability of motives for self-exclusion reporter by online poker gamblers in a cohort using account-based gambling data. BMJ Open. 2018 : 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  15. Carlbring P, Smit F. Randomized trial of internet-delivered self-help with telephone support for pathological gamblers. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2008 ; 76 : 1090–4. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Bücker L, Westermann S, Kühn S, et al. A self-guided internet-based intervention for individuals with gambling problems: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2019 ; 20 : 74. [Google Scholar]
  17. Nilsson A, Magnusson K, Carlbring P, et al. The development of an internet-based treatment for problem gamblers and concerned significant others: a pilot randomized controlled trial. J Gambl Stud. 2018 ; 34 : 539–59. [Google Scholar]
  18. Casey LM, Oei TPS, Raylu N, et al. Internet-based delivery of cognitive behavior therapy compared to monitoring, feedback and support for problem gambling: a randomized controlled trial. J Gambl Stud. 2017 ; 33 : 993–10. [Google Scholar]
  19. Luquiens A, Tanguy ML, Lagadec M, et al. The efficacy of three modalities of internet-based psychotherapy for non-treatment-seeking online problem gamblers: a randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2016 ; 18. [Google Scholar]
  20. Bouchard S, Robillard G, Giroux I, et al. Using virtual reality in the treatment of gambling disorder: the developpment of a new tool for cognitive and behavior therapy. Front Psychiatry. 2017 ; 8 : 1–8. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Volkow ND, Koob GF, McLellan AT. Neurobiologic advances from the brain disease model of addiction. N Engl J Med. 2016 ; 374 : 363–71. [Google Scholar]
  22. Sescousse G. Addiction aux jeux d’argent. Apport des neurosciences et de la neuro-imagerie. Med Sci (Paris). 2015 ; 31 : 784–91. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Luquiens A. Cognitive control training in online problem gambling: an online randomized controlled trial among non-treatment seeking problem gamblers (TRAIN-ONLINE). 2019, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03673800. [Google Scholar]
  24. Asharani PVN, Amron S, Ng RSK, et al. Utilization patterns of helpline and web chat services among gamblers in Singapore. Singapore Med J. 2019 ; 60 : 164–7. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Abbott M, Hodgins DC, Bellringer M, et al. Brief telephone interventions for problem gambling : a randomized controlled trial. Addiction. 2018 ; 113 : 883–95. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Elmasri D, Maeder A. A conversational agent for an online mental health intervention. Lect Notes Artif Int. 2016 ; 243–51. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.