EDP Sciences logo
Authentification abonné
Rechercher
Menu
Accueil Tous les numéros Volume 35 / Numéro 3 (Mars 2019) Med Sci (Paris), 35 3 (2019) 245-251 Références
Open Access
Numéro
Med Sci (Paris)
Volume 35, Numéro 3, Mars 2019
Page(s) 245 - 251
Section Forum
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/medsci/2019030
Publié en ligne 1 avril 2019
  1. Sturtevant AH. Essays on evolution. I. On the effects of selection on mutation rate. Quart Rev. Biol 1937 ; 12 : 464–467. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Demerec M.. Genetic factors stimulating mutability of the miniature gamma wing character of Drosophila virilis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1929 ; 15 : 834–838. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Demerec M.. Frequency of spontaneous mutations in certain stocks of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 1937 ; 22 : 469–478. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Muller HJ. The measurement of gene mutation rate in Drosophila, its high variability, and its dependence upon temperature. Genetics 1928 ; 13 : 279–357. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Sniegowski PD, Gerrish PJ, Johnson T, Shaver A. The evolution of mutation rates: separating causes from consequences. Bioessays 2000 ; 22 : 1057–1066. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Drake JW. A constant rate of spontaneous mutation in DNA-based microbes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1991 ; 88 : 7160–7164. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Drake JW. Rates of spontaneous mutation among RNA viruses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1993 ; 90 : 4171–4175. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Sung W, Tucker AE, Doak TG, et al. Extraordinary genome stability in the ciliate Paramecium tetraurelia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012 ; 109 : 19339–19344. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lynch M.. Evolution of the mutation rate. Trends Genet 2010 ; 26 : 345–352. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Eyre-Walker A, Keightley PD. The distribution of fitness effects of new mutations. Nat Rev Genet 2007 ; 8 : 610–618. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Robert L, Ollion J, Robert J, et al. Mutation dynamics and fitness effects followed in single cells. Science 2018 ; 359 : 1283–1286. [Google Scholar]
  12. Casane D, Laurenti P. Syllogomanie moléculaire: l’ADN non codant enrichit le jeu des possibles. Med Sci (Paris) 2014 ; 30 : 1177–1183. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Charlesworth B.. Effective population size and patterns of molecular evolution and variation. Nat Rev Genet 2009 ; 10 : 195. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lynch M, Ackerman MS, Gout JF, et al. Genetic drift, selection and the evolution of the mutation rate. Nat Rev Genet 2016 ; 17 : 704–714. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Quinones A, Piechocki R. Isolation and characterization of Escherichia coli antimutators. A new strategy to study the nature and origin of spontaneous mutations. Mol Gen Genet 1985 ; 201 : 315–322. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Loh E, Salk JJ, Loeb LA. Optimization of DNA polymerase mutation rates during bacterial evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010 ; 107 : 1154–1159. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Furio V, Moya A, Sanjuan R. The cost of replication fidelity in an RNA virus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005 ; 102 : 10233–10237. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lloyd SB, Kent SJ, Winnall WR. The High Cost of Fidelity. AIDS Res Hum Retrovir 2014 ; 30 : 8–16. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lynch M.. The lower bound to the evolution of mutation rates. Genome Biol Evol 2011 ; 3 : 1107–1118. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Sung W, Ackerman MS, Dillon MM, et al. Evolution of the insertion-deletion mutation rate across the tree of life. G3 (Bethesda) 2016; 6 : 2583–91. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Giraud A, Matic I, Tenaillon O, et al. Costs and benefits of high mutation rates: adaptive evolution of bacteria in the mouse gut. Science 2001 ; 291 : 2606–2608. [Google Scholar]
  22. Denamur E, Matic I. Evolution of mutation rates in bacteria. Mol Microbiol 2006 ; 60 : 820–827. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Denamur E, Lecointre G, Darlu P, et al. Evolutionary implications of the frequent horizontal transfer of mismatch repair genes. Cell 2000 ; 103 : 711–721. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Labat F, Pradillon O, Garry L, et al. Mutator phenotype confers advantage in Escherichia coli chronic urinary tract infection pathogenesis. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 2005 ; 44 : 317–321. [Google Scholar]
  25. Taddei F, Radman M, MaynardSmith J, et al. Role of mutator alleles in adaptive evolution. Nature 1997 ; 387 : 700–702. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Tenaillon O, Toupance B, Le Nagard H, et al. Mutators, population size, adaptive landscape and the adaptation of asexual populations of bacteria. Genetics 1999 ; 152 : 485–493. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Tanaka MM, Bergstrom CT, Levin BR. The evolution of mutator genes in bacterial populations: the roles of environmental change and timing. Genetics 2003 ; 164 : 843–854. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Johnson T. Beneficial mutations, hitchhiking and the evolution of mutation rates in sexual populations. Genetics 1999 ; 151 : 1621–1631. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.

Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.

Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.