EDP Sciences logo
Authentification abonné
Rechercher
Menu
Accueil Tous les numéros Volume 33 / Numéro 2 (Février 2017) Med Sci (Paris), 33 2 (2017) 159-168 Références
Accès gratuit
Numéro
Med Sci (Paris)
Volume 33, Numéro 2, Février 2017
Page(s) 159 - 168
Section M/S Revues
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/medsci/20173302011
Publié en ligne 27 février 2017
  1. Beal J, Weiss R, Densmore D, et al. An end-to-end workflow for engineering of biological networks from high-level specifications. ACS Synth Biol 2012 ; 1 : 317–331. [Google Scholar]
  2. Endy D. Foundations for engineering biology. Nature 2005 ; 438 : 449–453. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Saeidi N, Wong CK, Lo TM, et al. Engineering microbes to sense and eradicate Pseudomonas aeruginosa, a human pathogen. Mol Syst Biol 2011 ; 7 : 521. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Lo TM, Tan MH, Hwang IY, Chang MW Designing a synthetic genetic circuit that enables cell density-dependent auto-regulatory lysis for macromolecule release. Chem Eng Sci 2013 ; 103 : 29–35. [Google Scholar]
  5. Weber W, Schoenmakers R, Keller B, et al. A synthetic mammalian gene circuit reveals antituberculosis compounds. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008 ; 105 : 9994–9998. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ro DK, Paradise EM, Ouellet M, et al. Production of the antimalarial drug precursor artemisinic acid in engineered yeast. Nature 2006 ; 440 : 940–943. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gilad AA, McMahon MT, Walczak P, et al. Artificial reporter gene providing MRI contrast based on proton exchange. Nat Biotechnol 2007 ; 25 : 217–219. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Jaffe EK, Volin M, Bronson-Mullins CR, et al. An artificial gene for human porphobilinogen synthase allows comparison of an allelic variation implicated in susceptibility to lead poisoning. J Biol Chem 2000 ; 275 : 2619–2626. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Xie Z, Wroblewska L, Prochazka L, et al. Multi-input RNAi-based logic circuit for identification of specific cancer cells. Science 2011 ; 333 : 1307–1311. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Miyamoto T, Razavi S, DeRose R, Inoue T Synthesizing biomolecule-based Boolean logic gates. ACS Synth Biol 2013 ; 2 : 72–82. [Google Scholar]
  11. Frezza BM, Cockroft SL, Ghadiri MR Modular multi-level circuits from immobilized DNA-based logic gates. J Am Chem Soc 2007 ; 129 : 14875–14879. [Google Scholar]
  12. Daniel R, Rubens JR, Sarpeshkar R, Lu TK Synthetic analog computation in living cells. Nature 2013 ; 497 : 619–623. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Basu S, Gerchman Y, Collins CH, et al. A synthetic multicellular system for programmed pattern formation. Nature 2005 ; 434 : 1130–1134. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Garaschuk O, Griesbeck O, Konnerth A Troponin C-based biosensors : a new family of genetically encoded indicators for in vivo calcium imaging in the nervous system. Cell Calcium 2007 ; 42 : 351–361. [Google Scholar]
  15. French CE, de Mora K, Joshi N, et al. Synthetic biology and the art of biosensor design. In: Institute of medicine (US) forum on microbial threats. The science and applications of synthetic and systems biology : workshop summary. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US), 2011 : A5. Available from : https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK84465/. [Google Scholar]
  16. Kemmer C, Fluri DA, Witschi U, et al. A designer network coordinating bovine artificial insemination by ovulation-triggered release of implanted sperms. J Control Release 2011 ; 150 : 23–29. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Rabinovitch-Deere CA, Oliver JWK, Rodriguez GM, Atsumi S Synthetic biology and metabolic engineering approaches to produce biofuels. Chem Rev 2013 ; 113 : 4611–4632. [Google Scholar]
  18. Peralta-Yahya PP, Zhang F, del Cardayre SB, Keasling JD Microbial engineering for the production of advanced biofuels. Nature 2012 ; 488 : 320–328. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Canton B, Labno A, Endy D Refinement and standardization of synthetic biological parts and devices. Nat Biotechnol 2008 ; 26 : 787–793. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Knight T. Idempotent vector design for standard assembly of biobricks. In: MIT artificial intelligence laboratory. MIT Synthetic Biology Working Group, 2003. Available : http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/21168. [Google Scholar]
  21. Endy D. BioBrick foundation website. http://biobricks.org/ [Google Scholar]
  22. Gardner TS, Cantor CR, Collins JJ Construction of a genetic toggle switch in Escherichia coli. Lett Nat 2000 ; 403 : 339–342. [Google Scholar]
  23. Richard N. Électronique numérique et séquentielle. Collection Sciences Sup. Paris : Dunod, 2002 : 264 p. [Google Scholar]
  24. Moon TS, Lou C, Tamsir A, et al. Genetic programs constructed from layered logic gates in single cells. Nature 2012 ; 7423 : 249–253. [Google Scholar]
  25. Mu M, Wieland M, Fussenegger M Programmable single-cell mammalian biocomputers. Nature 2012 ; 487 : 5–10. [Google Scholar]
  26. Wang B, Kitney RI, Joly N, Buck M Engineering modular and orthogonal genetic logic gates for robust digital-like synthetic biology. Nat Commun 2011 ; 2 : 508. [Google Scholar]
  27. Gendrault Y, Madec M, Lallement C, et al. Synthetic biology methodology and model refinement based on microelectronic modeling tools and languages. Biotechnol J 2011 ; 6 : 796–806. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Lux MW, Bramlett BW, Ball DA, Peccoud J Genetic design automation : engineering fantasy or scientific renewal? Trends Biotechnol 2012 ; 30 : 120–126. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. MacDonald JT, Barnes C, Kitney RI, et al. Computational design approaches and tools for synthetic biology. Integr Biol (Camb) 2011 ; 3 : 97–108. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Hucka M. The systems biology markup language (SBML): a medium for representation and exchange of biochemical network models. Bioinformatics 2003 ; 19 : 524–531. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Cooling MT, Rouilly V, Misirli G, et al. Standard virtual biological parts : a repository of modular modeling components for synthetic biology. Bioinformatics 2010 ; 26 : 925–931. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Le Novère N, Bornstein B, Broicher A, et al. BioModels database : a free, centralized database of curated, published, quantitative kinetic models of biochemical and cellular systems. Nucleic Acids Res 2006 ; 34 : 689–691. [Google Scholar]
  33. Hoops S, Sahle S, Gauges R, et al. COPASI : a complex pathway simulator. Bioinformatics 2006 ; 22 : 3067–3074. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Bergmann FT, Sauro HM Comparing simulation results of SBML capable simulators. Bioinformatics 2008 ; 24 : 1963–1965. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Czar MJ, Cai Y, Peccoud J Writing DNA with GenoCAD. Nucleic Acids Res 2009 ; 37 : W40–W47. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Goler JA. BioJADE : a design and simulation tool for synthetic biological systems. PhD dissertation. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  37. Beal J, Weiss R, Densmore D, et al. TASBE : a tool-chain to accelerate synthetic biological engineering. Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Bio-Design Automation 2011 ; 2 : 19–21. [Google Scholar]
  38. Nielsen AAK, Der BS, Shin J, et al. Genetic circuit design automation. Science 2016 ; 352 : aac7341. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Wang LT, Chang YW, Cheng KTT. Electronic design automation : synthesis, verification, and test. Morgan Kaufmann, 2009 : 972 p. [Google Scholar]
  40. Madec M, Pecheux F, Gendrault Y, et al. GeNeDA : an open-source workflow for the design automation of gene regulatory networks. J Comput Biol 2016 ; 23 : 841–855. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Thomas DE, Moorby PR. The Verilog® hardware description language New York : Springer, 2002 : 386 p. [Google Scholar]
  42. Bhatia S, Densmore D Pigeon : a design visualizer for synthetic biology. ACS Synth Biol 2013 ; 2 : 348–350. [Google Scholar]
  43. Gendrault Y, Madec M, Lallement C, Haiech J Modeling biology with HDL languages : a first step toward a genetic design automation tool inspired from microelectronics. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2014 ; 61 : 1231–1240. [Google Scholar]
  44. Rezgui A, Madec M, Lallement C, Haiech J. Integration of SBML models for the description of biological system in a lab-on-chip. 22nd International Conference Mixed Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems (MIXDES), 2015 : 165–170. [Google Scholar]
  45. Engvall E, Perlmann P Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) quantitative assay of immunoglobulin G. Immunochemistry 1971 ; 8 : 871–874. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Guiton S, Rezgui A, Madec M, et al. Modeling and simulation of a Lab-On-Chip for micropollutants detection. Proceedings of the 21st International Conference Mixed Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems (MIXDES), 2014 : 256–261. [Google Scholar]
  47. Tamsir A, Tabor JJ, Voigt CA Robust multicellular computing using genetically encoded NOR gates and chemical wires. Nature 2011 ; 469 : 212–215. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Balagaddé FK, Song H, Ozaki J, et al. A synthetic Escherichia coli predator-prey ecosystem. Mol Syst Biol 2008 ; 4 : 187. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Krencker JC, Kammerer JB, Hervé Y, Hébrard L. Direct electro-thermal simulation of integrated circuits using standard CAD tools. Thermal Investigations of ICs and Systems (Therminic), 16th International Workshop, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  50. Rosati E, Madec M, Kammerer JB, et al. Verilog-A compact space-dependent model for biology. Mixed design of integrated circuits and systems (MIXDES), 22nd International Conference, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  51. Képès F. Biologie synthétique et intégrative. Med Sci (Paris) 2009 ; 25 (hs2) : 39–42. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Haiech J. Une vision de l’évolution de la biologie par un biologiste. D’une biologie descriptive vers une biologie prédictive. Med Sci (Paris) 2013 ; 29 (hs2) : 43–46. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Mazier D, Prix Thellier M Nobel de médecine, Youyou Tu, de Mao Zedong au Prix Nobel. Mec Sci (Paris) 2015 ; 2016 ; 32 : 106–109. [Google Scholar]

Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.

Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.

Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.