Accès gratuit
Numéro
Med Sci (Paris)
Volume 31, Numéro 6-7, Juin–Juillet 2015
Page(s) 680 - 686
Section Forum
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/medsci/20153106023
Publié en ligne 7 juillet 2015
  1. Pennisi E. ENCODE project writes eulogy for junk DNA. Science 2012 ; 337 : 1159–1161. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Dunham I, Kundaje A, Aldred SF, et al. An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome. Nature 2012 ; 489 : 57–74. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Rands CM, Meader S, Ponting CP, Lunter G.. 8.2% of the Human genome is constrained: variation in rates of turnover across functional element classes in the Human lineage. PLoS Genet 2014 ; 10 : e1004525. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Ponting CP, Hardison RC. What fraction of the human genome is functional? Genome Res 2011 ; 21 : 1769–1776. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Ecker JR. Forum: Genomics ENCODE explained. Nature 2012 ; 489 : 52–53. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. The Alberts B.. End of small science? Science 2012 ; 337 : 1583. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Doolittle WF. Is junk DNA bunk? A critique of ENCODE. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2013 ; 110 : 5294–5300. [CrossRef]
  8. Eddy SR. The ENCODE project: missteps overshadowing a success. Curr Biol 2013 ; 23 : R259–R261. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Niu DK, Jiang L. Can ENCODE tell us how much junk DNA we carry in our genome? Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2013 ; 430 : 1340–1343. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Palazzo AF, Gregory TR., The case for junk DNA. PLoS Genet 2014 ; 10 : e1004351. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Graur D, Zheng YC, Price N, et al. On the immortality of television sets: function in the Human genome according to the evolution-free gospel of ENCODE. Genome Biol Evol 2013 ; 5 : 578–590. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Muerdter F, Stark A. Genomics: hiding in plain sight. Nature 2014 ; 512 : 374–375. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Gerstein MB, Rozowsky J, Yan KK, et al. Comparative analysis of the transcriptome across distant species. Nature 2014 ; 512 : 445–448. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Doolittle WF, Brunet TDP, Linquist S, Gregory TR. Distinguishing between function and effect in genome biology. Genome Biol Evol 2014 ; 6 : 1234–1237. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Struhl K. Transcriptional noise and the fidelity of initiation by RNA polymerase II. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2007 ; 14 : 103–105. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Ruths T, Nakhleh L.. ncDNA, drift drive binding site accumulation. BMC Evol Biol 2012 ; 12 : 159. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Gould SJ, Lewontin RC. The spandrels of San Marco and the panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme. Proc R Soc Lond B 1979 ; 205 : 581–598. [CrossRef]
  18. Lynch M.. The origins of genome architecture. Sunderland, Massachusetts : Sinauer, 2007.
  19. Kimura M.. The neutral theory of molecular evolution. New York : Cambridge University Press, 1983. [CrossRef]
  20. Rice WR. Nothing in genetics makes sense except in light of genomic conflict. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 2013 ; 44 : 217–237. [CrossRef]
  21. De Koning APJ, Gu WJ, Castoe TA, et al. Repetitive elements may comprise over two-thirds of the Human genome. Plos Genet 2011 ; 7 : e1002384. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Zhang ZL, Harrison PM, Liu Y, Gerstein M. Millions of years of evolution preserved: a comprehensive catalog of the processed pseudogenes in the human genome. Genome Res 2003 ; 13 : 2541–2558. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Jacobs FMJ, Greenberg D, Nguyen N, et al. An evolutionary arms race between KRAB zinc-finger genes ZNF91/93 and SVA/L1 retrotransposons. Nature 2014 ; 516 : 242–245. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Hua-Van A, Le Rouzic A, Boutin TS, et al. The struggle for life of the genome’s selfish architects. Biol Direct 2011 ; 6 : 19. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Lynch M, Conery JS. The evolutionary fate and consequences of duplicate genes. Science 2000 ; 290 : 1151–1155. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. De Souza FSJ, Franchini LF, Rubinstein M. Exaptation of transposable elements into novel cis-regulatory elements: is the evidence always strong? Mol Biol Evol 2013 ; 30 : 1239–1251. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Casane D, Laurenti P. Syllogomanie moléculaire : l’ADN non codant enrichit le jeu des possibles. Med Sci (Paris) 2014 ; 30 : 1177–1183. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed]
  28. Oulion S, Debiais-Thibaud M, d’Aubenton-Carafa Y, et al. Evolution of Hox gene clusters in gnathostomes: insights from a survey of a shark (Scyliorhinus canicula) transcriptome. Mol Biol Evol 2010 ; 27 : 2829–2838. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Oulion S, Laurenti P, Casane D. Organisation des gènes Hox : l’étude de vertébrés non-modèles mène à un nouveau paradigme. Med Sci (Paris) 2012 ; 28 : 350–353. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed]
  30. Pascual-Anaya J, D’Aniello S, Kuratani S, Garcia-Fernandez J.. Evolution of Hox gene clusters in deuterostomesBMC Dev Biol 2013 ; 13 : 26. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Jordan B. Fugu story. Med Sci (Paris) 1994 ; 10 : 1154–1156. [CrossRef]
  32. Metcalfe CJ, Casane D.. Accommodating the load: the transposable element content of very large genomes. Mob Genet Elements 2013 ; 3 : e24775. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Metcalfe CJ, Filee J, Germon I, et al. Evolution of the Australian lungfish (Neoceratodus forsteri) genome: a major role for CR1 and L2 LINE elements. Mol Biol Evol 2012 ; 29 : 3529–3539. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Kapusta A, Feschotte C. Volatile evolution of long noncoding RNA repertoires: mechanisms and biological implications. Trends Genet 2014 ; 30 : 439–452. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. De Vienne DM, Giraud T, Gouyon PH.. Lineage selection and the maintenance of sex. PLoS One 2013 ; 8 : e66906. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Boschetti C, Carr A, Crisp A, et al. Biochemical diversification through foreign gene expression in bdelloid rotifers. PLoS Genet 2012 ; 8 : e1003035. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Flot JF, Hespeels B, Li X, et al. Genomic evidence for ameiotic evolution in the bdelloid rotifer Adineta vaga. Nature 2013 ; 500 : 453–457. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.

Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.

Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.