Free Access
Issue
Med Sci (Paris)
Volume 21, Number 1, Janvier 2005
Page(s) 104 - 109
Section Forum
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/medsci/2005211104
Published online 15 January 2005
  1. Knott GW, Quairiaux C, Genoud C, Welker E. Formation of dendritic spines with GABAergic synapses induced by whisker stimulation in adult mice. Neuron 2002; 34 : 265–73. [Google Scholar]
  2. Kempermann G, Gast D, Gage FH. Neuroplasticity in old age : Sustained fivefold induction of hippocampal neurogenesis by long-term environmental enrichment. Ann Neurol 2002; 52 : 135–43. [Google Scholar]
  3. Rocher C, Spedding M, Munoz C, Jay TM. Acute stress-induced changes in hippocampal/prefrontal circuits in rats : Effects of antidepressants. Cereb Cortex 2004; 14 : 224–9. [Google Scholar]
  4. McEwen BS. Stress and hippocampal plasticity. Annu Rev Neurosci 1999; 22 : 105–22. [Google Scholar]
  5. Reagan LP, Rosell DR, Wood GE, et al. Chronic restraint stress up-regulates GLT-1 mRNA and protein expression in the rat hippocampus : Reversal by tianeptine. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004; 101 : 2179–84. [Google Scholar]
  6. Rutter ML. Psychosocial adversity and child psychopathology. Br J Psychiatry 1999; 174 : 480–93. [Google Scholar]
  7. Meaney MJ. Maternal care, gene expression, and the transmission of individual differences in stress reactivity across generations. Annu Rev Neurosci 2001; 24 : 1161–92. [Google Scholar]
  8. Mayberg HS. Limbic-cortical dysregulation : A proposed model of depression. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 1997; 9 : 471–81. [Google Scholar]
  9. Rajkowska G, Miguel-Hidalgo JJ, Wei J, et al. Morphometric evidence for neuronal and glial prefrontal cell pathology in major depression. Biol Psychiatry 1999; 45 : 1085–98. [Google Scholar]
  10. Sheline YI, Sanghavi M, Mintun MA, Gado MH. Depression duration but not age predicts hippocampal volume loss in medically healthy women with recurrent major depression. J Neurosci 1999; 19 : 5034–43. [Google Scholar]
  11. Duman RS, Charney DS. Cell atrophy and loss in major depression. Biol Psychiatry 1999; 45 : 1083–4. [Google Scholar]
  12. Bremner JD, Vythilingam M, Vermetten E, et al. Reduced volume of orbitofrontal cortex in major depression. Biol Psychiatry 2002; 51 : 273–9. [Google Scholar]
  13. Andriamampandry C, Muller C, Schmidt-Mutter C, et al. Mss4 gene is up-regulated in rat brain after chronic treatment with antidepressant and down-regulated when rats are anhedonic. Mol Pharmacol 2002; 62 : 1332–8. [Google Scholar]
  14. Shakesby AC, Anwyl R, Rowan MJ. Overcoming the effects of stress on synaptic plasticity in the intact hippocampus : Rapid actions of serotonergic and antidepressant agents. J Neurosci 2002; 22 : 3638–44. [Google Scholar]
  15. Diamond DM, Campbell A, Park CR, Vouimba RM. Preclinical research on stress, memory and the brain in the development of pharmacotherapy for depression. Eur J Neuropsychopharmacol 2004; 14 : S491–5. [Google Scholar]
  16. Cassano GB, Heinze G, Lôo H, et al. A double-blind comparison of tianeptine, imipramine and placebo in the treatment of major depressive episodes. Eur Psychiatry 1996; 11 : 254–9. [Google Scholar]
  17. Morris RG, Kelly S, Burney D, et al. Tianeptine and its enantiomers : Effects on spatial memory in rats with medial septum lesions. Neuropharmacology 2001; 41 : 272–81. [Google Scholar]
  18. Czeh B, Michaelis T, Watanabe T, et al. Stress-induced changes in cerebral metabolites, hippocampal volume, and cell proliferation are prevented by antidepressant treatment with tianeptine. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001; 98 : 12796–801. [Google Scholar]
  19. Kole MH, Swan L, Fuchs E. The antidepressant tianeptine persistently modulates glutamate receptor currents of the hippocampal CA3 commissural associational synapse in chronically stressed rats. Eur J Neurosci 2002; 16 : 807–16. [Google Scholar]
  20. Ito I, Tanabe S, Kohda A, Sugiyama H. Allosteric potentiation of quisqualate receptors by a nootropic drug aniracetam. J Physiol (Lond) 1990; 424 : 533–43. [Google Scholar]
  21. Lebrun C, Pilliere E, Lestage P. Effects of S 18986–1, a novel cognitive enhancer, on memory performances in an object recognition task in rats. Eur J Pharmacol 2000; 401 : 205–12. [Google Scholar]
  22. Lockhart B, Iop F, Closier M, Lestage P. (S)-2,3-dihydro-[3,4]cyclopentano-1,2,4-benzothiadiazine-1,1-dioxide : (S18986-1) a positive modulator of AMPA receptors enhances (S)-AMPA-mediated 3H noradrenaline release from rat hippocampal and frontal cortex slices. Eur J Pharmacol 2000; 401 : 145–53. [Google Scholar]
  23. Arai AC, Xia YF, Rogers G, et al. Benzamide-type AMPA receptor modulators form two subfamilies with distinct modes of action. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2002; 303 : 1075–85. [Google Scholar]
  24. Lauterborn JC, Lynch G, Vanderklish P, et al. Positive modulation of AMPA receptors increases neurotrophin expression by hippocampal and cortical neurons. J Neurosci 2000; 20 : 8–21. [Google Scholar]
  25. Dicou E, Rangon CM, Guimiot F, et al. Positive allosteric modulators of AMPA receptors are neuroprotective against lesions induced by an NMDA agonist in neonatal mouse brain. Brain Res 2003; 970 : 221–5. [Google Scholar]
  26. Tardin C, Cognet L, Bats C, et al. Direct imaging of lateral movements of AMPA receptors inside synapses. EMBO J 2003; 22 : 4656–65. [Google Scholar]
  27. Barry MF, Ziff EB. Receptor trafficking and the plasticity of excitatory synapses. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2002; 12 : 279–86. [Google Scholar]
  28. Buzsaki G. Theta oscillations in the hippocampus. Neuron 2002; 33 : 325–40. [Google Scholar]
  29. Rogan MT, Staubli UV, LeDoux JE. Fear conditioning induces associative long-term potentiation in the amygdala. Nature 1997; 390 : 604–7. [Google Scholar]
  30. Marrone DF, Petit TL. The role of synaptic morphology in neural plasticity : structural interactions underlying synaptic power. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 2002; 38 : 291–308. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.