EDP Sciences logo
Authentification abonné
Rechercher
Menu
Accueil Tous les numéros Volume 19 / Numéro 12 (Décembre 2003) Med Sci (Paris), 19 12 (2003) 1209-1217 Références
Accès gratuit
Numéro
Med Sci (Paris)
Volume 19, Numéro 12, Décembre 2003
Page(s) 1209 - 1217
Section M/S revues
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/medsci/200319121209
Publié en ligne 15 décembre 2003
  1. Riddle DL, Blumenthal T, Meyer BJ, Priess JR. C. elegans II. Woodbury: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 1997 : 1222 p. [Google Scholar]
  2. Morse TM, Ferree TC, Lockery SR. Robust spatial navigation in a robot inspired by C. elegans. Adaptive Behav 1998; 6 : 391–408. [Google Scholar]
  3. Troemel ER, Chou JH, Dwyer ND, Colbert HA, Bargmann CI. Divergent seven transmembrane receptors are candidate chemosensory receptors in C. elegans. Cell 1995; 83 : 207–18. [Google Scholar]
  4. Troemel ER, Kimmel BE, Bargmann CI. Reprogramming chemotaxis responses: sensory neurons define olfactory preferences in C. elegans. Cell 1997; 91 : 161–9. [Google Scholar]
  5. Sagasti A, Hisamoto N, Hyodo J, Tanaka-Hino M, Matsumoto K, Bargmann C. The CaMKII UNC-43 activates the MAPKKK NSY-1 to execute a lateral signaling decision required for asymmetric olfactory neuron fates. Cell 2001; 105 : 221–32. [Google Scholar]
  6. Tanaka-Hino M, Sagasti A, Hisamoto N, et al. SEK-1 MAPKK mediates Ca2+ signaling to determine neuronal asymmetric development in Caenorhabditis elegans. EMBO Rep 2002; 3 : 56–62. [Google Scholar]
  7. Wes PD, Bargmann C. C. elegans odour discrimination requires asymmetric diversity in olfactory neurons. Nature 2001; 410 : 698–701. [Google Scholar]
  8. Golden JW, Riddle DL. The Caenorhabditis elegans dauer larva: developmental effects of pheromone, food, and temperature. Dev Biol 1984; 102 : 368–78. [Google Scholar]
  9. Simon JM, Sternberg PW. Evidence of a mate-finding cue in the hermaphrodite nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002; 99 : 1598–603. [Google Scholar]
  10. Hilliard MA, Bargmann CI, Bazzicalupo P. C. elegans responds to chemical repellents by integrating sensory inputs from the head and the tail. Curr Biol 2002; 12 : 730–4. [Google Scholar]
  11. Sawin ER, Ranganathan R, Horvitz HR. C. elegans locomotory rate is modulated by the environment through a dopaminergic pathway and by experience through a serotonergic pathway. Neuron 2000; 26 : 619–31. [Google Scholar]
  12. Peckol EL, Troemel ER, Bargmann CI. Sensory experience and sensory activity regulate chemosensory receptor gene expression in Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001; 98 : 11032–8. [Google Scholar]
  13. Raizen DM, Avery L. Electrical activity and behavior in the pharynx of Caenorhabditis elegans. Neuron 1994; 12 : 483–95. [Google Scholar]
  14. Kerr R, Lev-Ram V, Baird G, Vincent P, Tsien RY, Schafer WR. Optical imaging of calcium transients in neurons and pharyngeal muscle of C. elegans. Neuron 2000; 26 : 583–94. [Google Scholar]
  15. Ewbank JJ. Tackling both sides of the host-pathogen equation with Caenorhabditis elegans. Microbes Infect 2002; 4 : 247–56. [Google Scholar]
  16. Mallo GV, Kurz CL, Couillault C, et al. Inducible antibacterial defense system in C. elegans. Curr Biol 2002; 12 : 1209–14. [Google Scholar]
  17. Dal Santo P, Logan MA, Chisholm AD, Jorgensen EM. The inositol trisphosphate receptor regulates a 50-second behavioral rhythm in C. elegans. Cell 1999; 98 : 757–67. [Google Scholar]
  18. Kippert F, Saunders DS, Blaxter ML. Caenorhabditis elegans has a circadian clock. Curr Biol 2002; 12 : R47–9. [Google Scholar]
  19. Saigusa T, Ishizaki S, Watabiki S, et al. Circadian behavioural rhythm in Caenorhabditis elegans. Curr Biol 2002; 12 : R46–7. [Google Scholar]
  20. Burr AH. The photomovement of Caenorhabditis elegans, a nematode which lacks ocelli. Proof that the response is to light not radiant heating. Photochem Photobiol 1985; 41 : 577–82. [Google Scholar]
  21. Hekimi S. Une horloge cellulaire et physiologique règle la vie du nématode Caenorhabditis elegans. Med Sci 1997; 13 : 474–82. [Google Scholar]
  22. Dillin A, Hsu AL, Arantes-Oliveira N, et al. Rates of behavior and aging specified by mitochondrial function during development. Science 2002; 298 : 2398–401. [Google Scholar]
  23. Ewbank JJ, Barnes TM, Lakowski B, Lussier M, Bussey H, Hekimi S. Structural and functional conservation of the Caenorhabditis elegans timing gene clk-1. Science 1997; 275 : 980–3. [Google Scholar]
  24. Stenmark P, Grunler J, Mattsson J, Sindelar PJ, Nordlund P, Berthold DA. A new member of the family of di-iron carboxylate proteins. Coq7 (clk-1), a membrane-bound hydroxylase involved in ubiquinone biosynthesis. J Biol Chem 2001; 276 : 33297–300. [Google Scholar]
  25. Hihi AK, Gao Y, Hekimi S. Ubiquinone is necessary for Caenorhabditis elegans development at mitochondrial and non-mitochondrial sites. J Biol Chem 2002; 277 : 2202–6. [Google Scholar]
  26. Miyadera H, Kano K, Miyoshi H, Ishii N, Hekimi S, Kita K. Quinones in long-lived clk-1 mutants of Caenorhabditis elegans. FEBS Lett 2002; 512 : 33–7. [Google Scholar]
  27. Feng J, Bussiere F, Hekimi S. Mitochondrial electron transport is a key determinant of life span in Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev Cell 2001; 1 : 633–44. [Google Scholar]
  28. Lakowski B, Hekimi S. Determination of life-span in Caenorhabditis elegans by four clock genes. Science 1996; 272 : 1010–3. [Google Scholar]
  29. Arantes-Oliveira N, Apfeld J, Dillin A, Kenyon C. Regulation of life-span by germ-line stem cells in Caenorhabditis elegans. Science 2002; 295 : 502–5. [Google Scholar]
  30. Tissenbaum HA, Guarente L. Increased dosage of a sir-2 gene extends lifespan in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature 2001; 410 : 227–30. [Google Scholar]
  31. Benard C, McCright B, Zhang Y, Felkai S, Lakowski B, Hekimi S. The C. elegans maternal-effect gene clk-2 is essential for embryonic development, encodes a protein homologous to yeast Tel2p and affects telomere length. Development 2001; 128 : 4045–55. [Google Scholar]
  32. Benard C, Hekimi S. Long-lived mutants, the rate of aging, telomeres and the germline in Caenorhabditis elegans. Mech Ageing Dev 2002; 123 : 869–80. [Google Scholar]
  33. Partridge L, Gems D. Mechanisms of ageing: public or private? Nat Rev Genet 2002; 3 : 165–75. [Google Scholar]
  34. Lithgow GJ, Walker GA. Stress resistance as a determinate of C. elegans lifespan. Mech Ageing Dev 2002; 123 : 765–71. [Google Scholar]
  35. Lee SS, Lee RY, Fraser AG, Kamath RS, Ahringer J, Ruvkun G. A systematic RNAi screen identifies a critical role for mitochondria in C. elegans longevity. Nat Genet 2003; 33 : 40–8. [Google Scholar]
  36. Jansson HB. Adhesion of conidia of Drechmeria coniospora to Caenorhabditis elegans wild type and mutants. J Nematol 1994; 26 : 430–5. [Google Scholar]
  37. Hodgkin J, Kuwabara PE, Corneliussen B. A novel bacterial pathogen, Microbacterium nematophilum, induces morphological change in the nematode C. elegans. Curr Biol 2000; 10 : 1615–8. [Google Scholar]
  38. Couillault C, Ewbank JJ. Diverse bacteria are pathogens of Caenorhabditis elegans. Infect Immun 2002; 70 : 4705–7. [Google Scholar]
  39. Tan MW, Ausubel FM. Caenorhabditis elegans: a model genetic host to study Pseudomonas aeruginosa pathogenesis. Curr Opin Microbiol 2000; 3 : 29–34. [Google Scholar]
  40. Kurz CL, Ewbank JJ. Caenorhabditis elegans for the study of host-pathogen interactions. Trends Microbiol 2000; 8 : 142–4. [Google Scholar]
  41. Gallagher LA, Manoil C. Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 kills Caenorhabditis elegans by cyanide poisoning. J Bacteriol 2001; 183 : 6207–14. [Google Scholar]
  42. Pujol N, Link EM, Liu LX, et al. A reverse genetic analysis of components of the Toll signaling pathway in Caenorhabditis elegans. Curr Biol 2001; 11 : 809–21. [Google Scholar]
  43. Imler JL, Hoffmann JA. Signaling mechanisms in the antimicrobial host defense of Drosophila. Curr Opin Microbiol 2000; 3 : 16–22. [Google Scholar]
  44. Franc NC, White K. Innate recognition systems in insect immunity and development: new approaches in Drosophila. Microbes Infect 2000; 2 : 243–50. [Google Scholar]
  45. Linehan SA, Martinez-Pomares L, Gordon S. Macrophage lectins in host defence. Microbes Infect 2000; 2 : 279–88. [Google Scholar]
  46. Tan MW. Genetic and genomic dissection of host-pathogen interactions using a P. aeruginosa-C. elegans pathogenesis model. Pediatr Pulmonol 2001; 32 : 96–7. [Google Scholar]
  47. Kim DH, Feinbaum R, Alloing G, et al. A conserved p38 MAP kinase pathway in Caenorhabditis elegans innate immunity. Science 2002; 297 : 623–6. [Google Scholar]
  48. Aballay A, Ausubel FM. Programmed cell death mediated by ced-3 and ced-4 protects Caenorhabditis elegans from Salmonella typhimurium-mediated killing. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001; 98 : 2735–9. [Google Scholar]
  49. Aballay A, Drenkard E, Hilbun LR, Ausubel FM. Caenorhabditis elegans innate immune response triggered by Salmonella enterica requires intact LPS and is mediated by a MAPK signaling pathway. Curr Biol 2003; 13 : 47–52. [Google Scholar]
  50. Kurz CL, Ewbank JJ, Caenorhabditis elegans : an emerging model for the study of innate immunity. Nat Rev Genet 2003; 4 : 380–90. [Google Scholar]
  51. Genome sequence of the nematode C. elegans: a platform for investigating biology. The C. elegans Sequencing Consortium. Science 1998; 282 : 2012–8. [Google Scholar]
  52. Kim SK, Lund J, Kiraly M, et al. A gene expression map for Caenorhabditis elegans. Science 2001; 293 : 2087–92. [Google Scholar]
  53. Reboul J, Vaglio P, Tzellas N, et al. Open-reading-frame sequence tags (OSTs) support the existence of at least 17,300 genes in C. elegans. Nat Genet 2001; 2 : 332–6. [Google Scholar]
  54. Reboul J, Vaglio P, Rual JF, et al. C. elegans ORFeome version 1.1: experimental verification of the genome annotation and resource for proteome-scale protein expression. Nat Genet 2003; 34 : 35–41. [Google Scholar]
  55. Pujol N, Ewbank JJ. C. elegans, du génome à l’invalidation systématique par interférence par ARN. Med Sci 2001; 17 : 355–7. [Google Scholar]
  56. Kamath RS, Fraser AG, Dong Y, et al. Systematic functional analysis of the Caenorhabditis elegans genome using RNAi. Nature 2003; 421 : 231–7. [Google Scholar]
  57. Bessereau JL, Wright A, Williams DC, Schuske K, Davis MW, Jorgensen EM. Mobilization of a Drosophila transposon in the Caenorhabditis elegans germ line. Nature 2001; 413 : 70–4. [Google Scholar]
  58. Furlong EE, Profitt D, Scott MP. Automated sorting of live transgenic embryos. Nat Biotechnol 2001; 19 : 153–6. [Google Scholar]
  59. Avery L, Thomas JH. In : Riddle DL, Blumenthal T, Meyer BJ, Priess JR, eds. C. elegans II. Woodbury : Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 1997 : 679–716. [Google Scholar]
  60. Kurz CL, Pujol N. C. elegans : des montagnes de données. Med Sci 2002; 18 : 97-9. [Google Scholar]

Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.

Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.

Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.