EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
Home All issues Volume 19 / No 12 (Décembre 2003) Med Sci (Paris), 19 12 (2003) 1209-1217 References
Free Access
Issue
Med Sci (Paris)
Volume 19, Number 12, Décembre 2003
Page(s) 1209 - 1217
Section M/S revues
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/medsci/200319121209
Published online 15 December 2003
  1. Riddle DL, Blumenthal T, Meyer BJ, Priess JR. C. elegans II. Woodbury: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 1997 : 1222 p. [Google Scholar]
  2. Morse TM, Ferree TC, Lockery SR. Robust spatial navigation in a robot inspired by C. elegans. Adaptive Behav 1998; 6 : 391–408. [Google Scholar]
  3. Troemel ER, Chou JH, Dwyer ND, Colbert HA, Bargmann CI. Divergent seven transmembrane receptors are candidate chemosensory receptors in C. elegans. Cell 1995; 83 : 207–18. [Google Scholar]
  4. Troemel ER, Kimmel BE, Bargmann CI. Reprogramming chemotaxis responses: sensory neurons define olfactory preferences in C. elegans. Cell 1997; 91 : 161–9. [Google Scholar]
  5. Sagasti A, Hisamoto N, Hyodo J, Tanaka-Hino M, Matsumoto K, Bargmann C. The CaMKII UNC-43 activates the MAPKKK NSY-1 to execute a lateral signaling decision required for asymmetric olfactory neuron fates. Cell 2001; 105 : 221–32. [Google Scholar]
  6. Tanaka-Hino M, Sagasti A, Hisamoto N, et al. SEK-1 MAPKK mediates Ca2+ signaling to determine neuronal asymmetric development in Caenorhabditis elegans. EMBO Rep 2002; 3 : 56–62. [Google Scholar]
  7. Wes PD, Bargmann C. C. elegans odour discrimination requires asymmetric diversity in olfactory neurons. Nature 2001; 410 : 698–701. [Google Scholar]
  8. Golden JW, Riddle DL. The Caenorhabditis elegans dauer larva: developmental effects of pheromone, food, and temperature. Dev Biol 1984; 102 : 368–78. [Google Scholar]
  9. Simon JM, Sternberg PW. Evidence of a mate-finding cue in the hermaphrodite nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002; 99 : 1598–603. [Google Scholar]
  10. Hilliard MA, Bargmann CI, Bazzicalupo P. C. elegans responds to chemical repellents by integrating sensory inputs from the head and the tail. Curr Biol 2002; 12 : 730–4. [Google Scholar]
  11. Sawin ER, Ranganathan R, Horvitz HR. C. elegans locomotory rate is modulated by the environment through a dopaminergic pathway and by experience through a serotonergic pathway. Neuron 2000; 26 : 619–31. [Google Scholar]
  12. Peckol EL, Troemel ER, Bargmann CI. Sensory experience and sensory activity regulate chemosensory receptor gene expression in Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001; 98 : 11032–8. [Google Scholar]
  13. Raizen DM, Avery L. Electrical activity and behavior in the pharynx of Caenorhabditis elegans. Neuron 1994; 12 : 483–95. [Google Scholar]
  14. Kerr R, Lev-Ram V, Baird G, Vincent P, Tsien RY, Schafer WR. Optical imaging of calcium transients in neurons and pharyngeal muscle of C. elegans. Neuron 2000; 26 : 583–94. [Google Scholar]
  15. Ewbank JJ. Tackling both sides of the host-pathogen equation with Caenorhabditis elegans. Microbes Infect 2002; 4 : 247–56. [Google Scholar]
  16. Mallo GV, Kurz CL, Couillault C, et al. Inducible antibacterial defense system in C. elegans. Curr Biol 2002; 12 : 1209–14. [Google Scholar]
  17. Dal Santo P, Logan MA, Chisholm AD, Jorgensen EM. The inositol trisphosphate receptor regulates a 50-second behavioral rhythm in C. elegans. Cell 1999; 98 : 757–67. [Google Scholar]
  18. Kippert F, Saunders DS, Blaxter ML. Caenorhabditis elegans has a circadian clock. Curr Biol 2002; 12 : R47–9. [Google Scholar]
  19. Saigusa T, Ishizaki S, Watabiki S, et al. Circadian behavioural rhythm in Caenorhabditis elegans. Curr Biol 2002; 12 : R46–7. [Google Scholar]
  20. Burr AH. The photomovement of Caenorhabditis elegans, a nematode which lacks ocelli. Proof that the response is to light not radiant heating. Photochem Photobiol 1985; 41 : 577–82. [Google Scholar]
  21. Hekimi S. Une horloge cellulaire et physiologique règle la vie du nématode Caenorhabditis elegans. Med Sci 1997; 13 : 474–82. [Google Scholar]
  22. Dillin A, Hsu AL, Arantes-Oliveira N, et al. Rates of behavior and aging specified by mitochondrial function during development. Science 2002; 298 : 2398–401. [Google Scholar]
  23. Ewbank JJ, Barnes TM, Lakowski B, Lussier M, Bussey H, Hekimi S. Structural and functional conservation of the Caenorhabditis elegans timing gene clk-1. Science 1997; 275 : 980–3. [Google Scholar]
  24. Stenmark P, Grunler J, Mattsson J, Sindelar PJ, Nordlund P, Berthold DA. A new member of the family of di-iron carboxylate proteins. Coq7 (clk-1), a membrane-bound hydroxylase involved in ubiquinone biosynthesis. J Biol Chem 2001; 276 : 33297–300. [Google Scholar]
  25. Hihi AK, Gao Y, Hekimi S. Ubiquinone is necessary for Caenorhabditis elegans development at mitochondrial and non-mitochondrial sites. J Biol Chem 2002; 277 : 2202–6. [Google Scholar]
  26. Miyadera H, Kano K, Miyoshi H, Ishii N, Hekimi S, Kita K. Quinones in long-lived clk-1 mutants of Caenorhabditis elegans. FEBS Lett 2002; 512 : 33–7. [Google Scholar]
  27. Feng J, Bussiere F, Hekimi S. Mitochondrial electron transport is a key determinant of life span in Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev Cell 2001; 1 : 633–44. [Google Scholar]
  28. Lakowski B, Hekimi S. Determination of life-span in Caenorhabditis elegans by four clock genes. Science 1996; 272 : 1010–3. [Google Scholar]
  29. Arantes-Oliveira N, Apfeld J, Dillin A, Kenyon C. Regulation of life-span by germ-line stem cells in Caenorhabditis elegans. Science 2002; 295 : 502–5. [Google Scholar]
  30. Tissenbaum HA, Guarente L. Increased dosage of a sir-2 gene extends lifespan in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature 2001; 410 : 227–30. [Google Scholar]
  31. Benard C, McCright B, Zhang Y, Felkai S, Lakowski B, Hekimi S. The C. elegans maternal-effect gene clk-2 is essential for embryonic development, encodes a protein homologous to yeast Tel2p and affects telomere length. Development 2001; 128 : 4045–55. [Google Scholar]
  32. Benard C, Hekimi S. Long-lived mutants, the rate of aging, telomeres and the germline in Caenorhabditis elegans. Mech Ageing Dev 2002; 123 : 869–80. [Google Scholar]
  33. Partridge L, Gems D. Mechanisms of ageing: public or private? Nat Rev Genet 2002; 3 : 165–75. [Google Scholar]
  34. Lithgow GJ, Walker GA. Stress resistance as a determinate of C. elegans lifespan. Mech Ageing Dev 2002; 123 : 765–71. [Google Scholar]
  35. Lee SS, Lee RY, Fraser AG, Kamath RS, Ahringer J, Ruvkun G. A systematic RNAi screen identifies a critical role for mitochondria in C. elegans longevity. Nat Genet 2003; 33 : 40–8. [Google Scholar]
  36. Jansson HB. Adhesion of conidia of Drechmeria coniospora to Caenorhabditis elegans wild type and mutants. J Nematol 1994; 26 : 430–5. [Google Scholar]
  37. Hodgkin J, Kuwabara PE, Corneliussen B. A novel bacterial pathogen, Microbacterium nematophilum, induces morphological change in the nematode C. elegans. Curr Biol 2000; 10 : 1615–8. [Google Scholar]
  38. Couillault C, Ewbank JJ. Diverse bacteria are pathogens of Caenorhabditis elegans. Infect Immun 2002; 70 : 4705–7. [Google Scholar]
  39. Tan MW, Ausubel FM. Caenorhabditis elegans: a model genetic host to study Pseudomonas aeruginosa pathogenesis. Curr Opin Microbiol 2000; 3 : 29–34. [Google Scholar]
  40. Kurz CL, Ewbank JJ. Caenorhabditis elegans for the study of host-pathogen interactions. Trends Microbiol 2000; 8 : 142–4. [Google Scholar]
  41. Gallagher LA, Manoil C. Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 kills Caenorhabditis elegans by cyanide poisoning. J Bacteriol 2001; 183 : 6207–14. [Google Scholar]
  42. Pujol N, Link EM, Liu LX, et al. A reverse genetic analysis of components of the Toll signaling pathway in Caenorhabditis elegans. Curr Biol 2001; 11 : 809–21. [Google Scholar]
  43. Imler JL, Hoffmann JA. Signaling mechanisms in the antimicrobial host defense of Drosophila. Curr Opin Microbiol 2000; 3 : 16–22. [Google Scholar]
  44. Franc NC, White K. Innate recognition systems in insect immunity and development: new approaches in Drosophila. Microbes Infect 2000; 2 : 243–50. [Google Scholar]
  45. Linehan SA, Martinez-Pomares L, Gordon S. Macrophage lectins in host defence. Microbes Infect 2000; 2 : 279–88. [Google Scholar]
  46. Tan MW. Genetic and genomic dissection of host-pathogen interactions using a P. aeruginosa-C. elegans pathogenesis model. Pediatr Pulmonol 2001; 32 : 96–7. [Google Scholar]
  47. Kim DH, Feinbaum R, Alloing G, et al. A conserved p38 MAP kinase pathway in Caenorhabditis elegans innate immunity. Science 2002; 297 : 623–6. [Google Scholar]
  48. Aballay A, Ausubel FM. Programmed cell death mediated by ced-3 and ced-4 protects Caenorhabditis elegans from Salmonella typhimurium-mediated killing. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001; 98 : 2735–9. [Google Scholar]
  49. Aballay A, Drenkard E, Hilbun LR, Ausubel FM. Caenorhabditis elegans innate immune response triggered by Salmonella enterica requires intact LPS and is mediated by a MAPK signaling pathway. Curr Biol 2003; 13 : 47–52. [Google Scholar]
  50. Kurz CL, Ewbank JJ, Caenorhabditis elegans : an emerging model for the study of innate immunity. Nat Rev Genet 2003; 4 : 380–90. [Google Scholar]
  51. Genome sequence of the nematode C. elegans: a platform for investigating biology. The C. elegans Sequencing Consortium. Science 1998; 282 : 2012–8. [Google Scholar]
  52. Kim SK, Lund J, Kiraly M, et al. A gene expression map for Caenorhabditis elegans. Science 2001; 293 : 2087–92. [Google Scholar]
  53. Reboul J, Vaglio P, Tzellas N, et al. Open-reading-frame sequence tags (OSTs) support the existence of at least 17,300 genes in C. elegans. Nat Genet 2001; 2 : 332–6. [Google Scholar]
  54. Reboul J, Vaglio P, Rual JF, et al. C. elegans ORFeome version 1.1: experimental verification of the genome annotation and resource for proteome-scale protein expression. Nat Genet 2003; 34 : 35–41. [Google Scholar]
  55. Pujol N, Ewbank JJ. C. elegans, du génome à l’invalidation systématique par interférence par ARN. Med Sci 2001; 17 : 355–7. [Google Scholar]
  56. Kamath RS, Fraser AG, Dong Y, et al. Systematic functional analysis of the Caenorhabditis elegans genome using RNAi. Nature 2003; 421 : 231–7. [Google Scholar]
  57. Bessereau JL, Wright A, Williams DC, Schuske K, Davis MW, Jorgensen EM. Mobilization of a Drosophila transposon in the Caenorhabditis elegans germ line. Nature 2001; 413 : 70–4. [Google Scholar]
  58. Furlong EE, Profitt D, Scott MP. Automated sorting of live transgenic embryos. Nat Biotechnol 2001; 19 : 153–6. [Google Scholar]
  59. Avery L, Thomas JH. In : Riddle DL, Blumenthal T, Meyer BJ, Priess JR, eds. C. elegans II. Woodbury : Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 1997 : 679–716. [Google Scholar]
  60. Kurz CL, Pujol N. C. elegans : des montagnes de données. Med Sci 2002; 18 : 97-9. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.