Accès gratuit
Numéro
Med Sci (Paris)
Volume 19, Numéro 4, Avril 2003
Page(s) 453 - 458
Section M/S Revues
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/medsci/2003194453
Publié en ligne 15 avril 2003
  1. Szathmary E, Maynard Smith J. The major evolutionary transitions. Nature 1995; 374: 227–31.
  2. Crespi BJ. The evolution of social behavior in microorganisms. TREE 2001; 16: 178–83.
  3. Aron S, Passera L. Les sociétés animales. Évolution de la coopération et organisation sociale, Bruxelles: DeBoeck Université, 2000 : 366 p.
  4. Hamilton WD. The genetical evolution of social behavior. I and II. J Theor Biol 1964; 7:1–52.
  5. Trivers RL, Hare H. Haplodiploidy and the evolution of the social insects. Science 1976; 191: 249–63.
  6. Hasegawa E. Sex allocation in the ant Colobopsis nipponicus (Wheeler).1. Population sex ratio. Evolution 1994; 48: 1121–9.
  7. Pearson B, Raybould AF, Clarke RT. Breeding behaviour, relatedness and sex-investment ratios in Leptothorax tuberum Fabricius. Entomol Exp Appl 1995; 75: 165–74.
  8. Sundström L. Sex ratio bias, relatedness asymmetry and queen mating frequencies. Nature 1994; 367: 266–7.
  9. Sundström L. Sex allocation and colony maintenance in monogyne and polygyne colonies of Formica truncorum (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): the impact of kinship and mating structure. Am Nat 1995; 146: 182–201.
  10. Aron S, Passera L, Keller L. Queen-worker conflict over sex ratio: a comparison of primary and secondary sex ratios in the argentine ant, Iridomyrmex humilis, J Evol Biol 1994; 7: 403–8.
  11. Keller L, Aron S, Passera L. Internest sex-ratio variation and male brood survival in the ant Pheidole pallidula, Behav Ecol 1996; 7: 292–8.
  12. Sundström L, Chapuisat M, Keller L. Conditional manipulation of sex ratios by ant workers: a test of kin selection theory. Science 1996; 274: 993–5.
  13. Passera L, Aron S. Early sex discrimination and male brood elimination by workers of the Argentine ant. Proc R Soc Lond B 1996; 263: 1041–6.
  14. Helms KR. Colony sex ratios, conflict between queens and workers, and apparent queen control in the ant Pheidole desertorum, Evolution 1999; 53: 1470–8.
  15. Vargo EL. Sex investment ratios in monogyne and polygyne populations of the fire ant Solenopsis invicta, J Evol Biol 1996; 9: 783–802.
  16. Passera L, Aron S, Vargo E, Keller L. Queen control of sex ratio in fire ants. Science 2001; 293: 1308–10.
  17. Aron S, Vargo EL, Passera L. Primary and secondary sex ratios in monogyne colonies of the fire ant. Anim Behav 1995; 49: 749–57.
  18. Peeters C, Crewe R. Insemination controls the reproductive division of labour in a ponerine ant. Naturwissenschaften 1984; 71: 50–1.
  19. Monnin T, Peeters C. Dominance hierarchy and reproductive conflicts among subordinates in a monogynous queenless ant. Behav Ecol 1999; 10: 323–32.
  20. Peeters C, Monnin T, Malosse C. Cuticular hydrocarbons correlated with reproductive status in a queenless ant. Proc R Soc Lond B 1999; 266: 1323–27.
  21. Monnin T, Ratnieks FLW. Policing in queenless ponerine ants. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2001; 50: 97–108.

Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.

Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.

Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.