Accès gratuit
Numéro
Med Sci (Paris)
Volume 18, Numéro 11, Novembre 2002
Page(s) 1107 - 1112
Section M/S Revues : Dossier Technique
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/medsci/200218111107
Publié en ligne 15 novembre 2002
  1. Lawrence S, Giles CL. Searching the world wide Web. Science 1998; 280: 98–100.
  2. Lawrence S, Giles CL. Accessibility of information on the web. Nature 1999; 400: 107–9.
  3. Winship IR. World wide web searching tools - an evaluation. Vine 1995; 99: 49–54.
  4. Chu HT, Rosenthal M. Search engines for the world wide web: a comparative study and evaluation methodology. Proc ASIS Annu Meet 1996; 33: 127–35.
  5. Dong X, Su L. Search engines on the world wide web and information retrieval on the internet: a review and evaluation. Online CD ROM Rev 1997; 21: 67–81.
  6. Xie M, Wang H, Goh TN. Quality dimensions of internet search engines. J Inf Sci 1998; 24: 365–72.
  7. Wang H, Xie M, Goh TN. Service quality of internet search engines. J Inf Sci 1999; 25: 499–507.
  8. Akaho E, Ahmad SR. A comparative study of internet search engines by applying ’cost effective treatment for myocardial infarction’ as a search topic. Drug Inf J 1998; 32: 921–32.
  9. Wu G, Jie L. Comparing web search engine performance in searching consumer health information: evaluation and recommendations. Bull Med Libr Ass 1999; 87: 456–61.
  10. http://searchenginewatch.com/reports/sizes.html. Page consultée le 12 septembre 2002.
  11. Ding A, Marchionini G. Comparative study of web search service performance. Proc ASIS Annu Meet 1996; 33: 136–42.
  12. Venditto G. Search engine showdown. Internet World 1996; 7: 79–86.
  13. Clarke SJ, Willett P. Estimating the recall performance of web search engines. Aslib Proc 1997; 49: 184–9.
  14. Oppenheim C, Morris A, McKnight C. The evaluation of WWW search engines. J Doc 2000; 56: 190–211.
  15. Landoni M, Bell S. Information retrieval techniques for evaluating search engines: a critical overview. Aslib Proc 2000; 52: 124–9.
  16. Chignell MH, Gwizdka J, Bodner RC. Discriminating meta-search: a framework for evaluation. Inf Process Manag 1999; 35: 337–62.
  17. Green R. Topical relevance relationships. Why topic matching fails. J Am Soc Inf Sci 1995; 6: 646–53.
  18. Hawking D, Craswell N, Thistlewaite P, Harman D. Results and challenges in web search evaluation. Comput Networks 1999; 31: 1321–30.
  19. Gardner M. A scienceoriented search engine could solve problems. Nature 1999; 401: 111.
  20. Shon J, Musen MA. The low availability of metadata elements for evaluating the quality of medical information on the world wide web. Proc AMIA Symp 1999; 1945–9.

Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.

Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.

Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.