Accès gratuit
Numéro
Med Sci (Paris)
Volume 18, Numéro 1, Janvier 2002
Page(s) 91 - 96
Section M/S Revues : Dossier Technique
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/medsci/200218191
Publié en ligne 15 janvier 2002
  1. Andreason G, Evans G. Introduction and expression of DNA molecules in eukaryotic cells by electroporation. Biotechniques 1988;6 : 650–60. [Google Scholar]
  2. Shillito R, Saul M, Paszkowski J, Muller M, Potrykus I. High efficiency direct gene transfer to plants. Biotechnology 1985; 3: 1099–103. [Google Scholar]
  3. Ittasaki N, Bel-Vialar S, Krumlauf R. “Shocking” developments in chick embryology: electroporation and in ovo gene expression. Nat Cell Biol 1999; 1 : E203–7. [Google Scholar]
  4. Momose T, Tonegawa A, Takeuchi J, Ogawa H, Umesono K, Yasuda K. Efficient targeting of gene expression in chick embryos by microelectroporation. Dev Growth Differ 1999; 41 : 335–44. [Google Scholar]
  5. Petropoulos C, Payne W, Salter D, Hughes S. Using avian retroviral vectors for gene transfer. J Virology 1992; 66: 3391–7. [Google Scholar]
  6. Furth PA. Gene transfer by biolistic process. Mol Biotechnol 1997; 7: 139–43. [Google Scholar]
  7. Rosenblum CI, Chen HY.In ovo transfection of chicken embryos using cationic liposomes. Transgenic Res 1995; 4: 192–8. [Google Scholar]
  8. Muramatsu, T, Mizutani Y, Ohmori Y, Okumura JI. Comparison of three non-viral transfection methods for foreign gene expression in early chicken embryos in ovo. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1997; 230 : 376–80. [Google Scholar]
  9. Baer A, Schubeler D, Bode J. Transcriptional properties of genomic transgene integration sites marked by electroporation or retroviral infection. Biochemistry 2000; 39: 7041–9. [Google Scholar]
  10. Grapin-Botton A, Majithia AR, Melton DA. Key events of pancreas formation are triggered in gut endoderm by ectopic expression of pancreatic regulatory genes. Genes Dev 2001; 15 : 444–54. [Google Scholar]
  11. Dubrulle J, McGrew MJ, Pourquie O. FGF signaling controls somite boundary position and regulates segmentation clock control of spatiotemporal Hox gene activation. Cell 2001; 106 : 219–32. [Google Scholar]
  12. Fukuda K, Sakamoto N, Narita T, et al. Application of efficient and specific gene transfer systems and organ culture techniques for the elucidation of mechanisms of epithelialmesenchymal interaction in the developing gut. Dev Growth Differ 2000; 42 : 207–11. [Google Scholar]
  13. Osumi N, Inoue T. Gene transfer into cultured mammalian embryos by electroporation. Methods 2001; 24: 35–42. [Google Scholar]
  14. Corbo JC, Levine M, Zeller RW. Characterization of a notochord-specific enhancer from the Brachyury promoter region of the ascidian, Ciona intestinalis. Development 1997; 124 : 589–602. [Google Scholar]
  15. Eide FF, Eisenberg SR, Sanders TA. Electroporation-mediated gene transfer in free-swimming embryonic Xenopus laevis. FEBS Lett 2000; 486 : 29–32. [Google Scholar]
  16. Kamdar KP, Wagner TN, Finnerty V. Electroporation of Drosophila embryos. Methods Mol Biol 1995; 48 : 239–43. [Google Scholar]
  17. Manzanares M, Wada H, Itasaki N, Trainor PA, Krumlauf R, Holland PW. Conservation and elaboration of Hox gene regulation during evolution of the vertebrate head. Nature 2000; 408 : 854–7. [Google Scholar]
  18. Manzanares M, Bel-Vialar S, Ariza-McNaughton L, et al. Independent regulation of initiation and maintenance phases of Hoxa3 expression in the vertebrate hindbrain. Development 2001; 128 : 3595–607. [Google Scholar]
  19. Giudicelli F, Taillebourg E, Charnay P, Gilardi-Hebenstreit P. Krox-20 patterns the hindbrain through both cell-autonomous and non cell-autonomous mechanisms. Genes Dev 2001; 15 : 567–80. [Google Scholar]
  20. Blumberg B, Bolado J Jr, Moreno TA, Kintner C, Evans RM, Papalopulu N. An essential role for retinoid signaling in anteroposterior neural patterning. Development 1997; 124 : 373–9. [Google Scholar]
  21. Gould A, Itasaki N, Krumlauf R. Initiation of rhombomeric Hoxb4 expression requires induction by somites and a retinoid pathway. Neuron 1998; 21: 39–51. [Google Scholar]
  22. Mathis L, Kulesa PM, Fraser SE. FGF receptor signalling is required to maintain neural progenitors during Hensen’s node progression. Nat Cell Biol 2001; 3 : 559–66. [Google Scholar]
  23. Mir LM, Glass LF, Sersa G, et al. Effective treatment of cutaneous and subeutaneous malignant tumours by electrochemotherapy. Br J Cancer 1998; 77 : 2336–42. [Google Scholar]
  24. Orlowsky S, Mir LM. Un nouveau traitement antitumoral : l’electrochimiothérapie. Med Sci 1998; 14 : 1235–9. [Google Scholar]
  25. Rols MP, Bachaud JM, Giraud P, Cherreau C, Roche H, Teissié J. Electrochemotherapy of cutaneous metastases in malignant melanoma. Melanoma Res 2000; 10 : 468–74 [Google Scholar]
  26. Rols MP, Delteil C, Golzio M, Dumond P, Cros S, Teissie J. In vivo electrically mediated protein and gene transfer in murine melanoma. Nat Biotechnol 1998; 16: 168–71. [Google Scholar]
  27. Mir LM, Bureau MF, Gehl J, et al. High-efficiency gene transfer into skeletal muscle mediated by electric pulses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999; 96 : 4262–7. [Google Scholar]
  28. Vicat JM, Boisseau S, Jourdes P, et al. Muscle transfection by electroporation with high-voltage and short- pulse currents provides high-level and long-lasting gene expression. Hum Gene Ther 2000; 11 : 909–16. [Google Scholar]
  29. Martin JB, Young JL, Benoit JN, Dean DA. Gene transfer to intact mesenteric arteries by electroporation. J Vasc Res 2000; 37 : 372–80. [Google Scholar]

Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.

Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.

Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.