EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
Home All issues Volume 40 / No 1 (Janvier 2024) Med Sci (Paris), 40 1 (2024) 92-97 References
Open Access
Issue
Med Sci (Paris)
Volume 40, Number 1, Janvier 2024
La cavité orale et les dents au cœur de la santé
Page(s) 92 - 97
Section M/S Revues
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/medsci/2023202
Published online 01 February 2024
  1. Couso-Queiruga E, Stuhr S, Tattan M, et al. Post-extraction dimensional changes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Periodontol 2021; 48 : 126–44. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bornstein MM, Halbritter S, Harnisch H, et al. A retrospective analysis of patients referred for implant placement to a specialty clinic: indications, surgical procedures, and early failures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008 ; 23 : 1109–1116. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Heimes D, Schiegnitz E, Kuchen R, et al. Buccal Bone Thickness in Anterior and Posterior Teeth-A Systematic Review. Healthc Basel Switz 2021; 9 : 1663. [Google Scholar]
  4. Muñoz S, Johnson TM, Dutner JM, et al. Implant site development requirements in an advanced dental education program: A series of 290 implants. J Dent Educ 2022; 86 : 1425–34. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Zhang Y, Al-Maawi S, Wang X, et al. Biomaterial-induced multinucleated giant cells express proinflammatory signaling molecules: A histological study in humans. J Biomed Mater Res A 2019 ; 107 : 780–790. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Danesh-Sani SA, Loomer PM, Wallace SS. A comprehensive clinical review of maxillary sinus floor elevation: anatomy, techniques, biomaterials and complications. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016 ; 54 : 724–730. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Shatta A, Bissada NF, Ricchetti P, et al. Impact of Implant and Site Characteristics on the Pattern of Bone Loss in Peri-implantitis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2019 ; 34 : 1475–1481. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Felice P, et al. The efficacy of horizontal and vertical bone augmentation procedures for dental implants - a Cochrane systematic review. Eur J Oral Implantol 2009 ; 2 : 167–184. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Mangano C, Luongo G, Luongo F, et al. Custom-made computer-aided-design/ computer-assisted-manufacturing (CAD/CAM) synthetic bone grafts for alveolar ridge augmentation: A retrospective clinical study with 3 years of follow-up. J Dent 2022; 127 : 104323. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. van der Heide D, Cidonio G, Stoddart MJ, et al. 3D printing of inorganic-biopolymer composites for bone regeneration. Biofabrication 2022; 14. doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/ac8cb2. [Google Scholar]
  11. Backes EH, Harb SV, Beatrice CAG, et al. Polycaprolactone usage in additive manufacturing strategies for tissue engineering applications: A review. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2022; 110 : 1479–503. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Anderson M, Dubey N, Bogie K, et al. Three-dimensional printing of clinical scale and personalized calcium phosphate scaffolds for alveolar bone reconstruction. Dent Mater 2022; 38 : 529–39. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Park H, Choi JW, Jeong WS. Clinical Application of Three-Dimensional Printing of Polycaprolactone/Beta-Tricalcium Phosphate Implants for Cranial Reconstruction. J Craniofac Surg 2022; 33 : 1394–9. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Meglioli M, Naveau A, Macaluso GM, et al. 3D-printed bone models for planning and training in oral and cranio-maxillofacial surgery: a systematic review. 3D Print Med 2020; 6 : 30. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Babilotte J, Guduric V, Le Nihouannen D, et al. 3D printed polymer-mineral composite biomaterials for bone tissue engineering: Fabrication and characterization. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2019 ; 107 : 2579–2595. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Tavelli L, Barootchi S, Rasperini G, et al. Clinical and patient-reported outcomes of tissue engineering strategies for periodontal and peri-implant reconstruction. Periodontol 2000 ; 2023 ; 91: 217–269. [Google Scholar]
  17. Liu J, Chen D, Zhu X, et al. Development of a decellularized human amniotic membrane-based electrospun vascular graft capable of rapid remodeling for small-diameter vascular applications. Acta Biomater 2022; 152 : 144–56. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Sándor GK, Tuovinen VJ, Wolff J, et al. Adipose stem cell tissue-engineered construct used to treat large anterior mandibular defect: a case report and review of the clinical application of good manufacturing practice-level adipose stem cells for bone regeneration. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013 ; 71 : 938–950. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Latimer JM, Maekawa S, Yao Y, et al. Regenerative Medicine Technologies to Treat Dental, Oral, and Craniofacial Defects. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2021; 9 : 704048. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Engel N, Fechner C, Voges A, et al. An optimized 3D-printed perfusion bioreactor for homogeneous cell seeding in bone substitute scaffolds for future chairside applications. Sci Rep 2021; 11 : 22228. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Guduric V, Siadous R, Babilotte J, et al. Layer-by-layer bioassembly of poly(lactic) acid membranes loaded with coculture of HBMSCs and EPCs improves vascularization in vivo. J Biomed Mater Res A 2019 ; 107 : 2629–2642. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Panda S, Satpathy A, Chandra Das A, et al. Additive Effect of Platelet Rich Fibrin with Coronally Advanced Flap Procedure in Root Coverage of Miller’s Class I and II Recession Defects-A PRISMA Compliant Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Mater Basel Switz 2020; 13 : E4314. [Google Scholar]
  23. Fujioka-Kobayashi M, Miron RJ, Moraschini V, et al. Efficacy of platelet-rich fibrin on bone formation, part 2: Guided bone regeneration, sinus elevation and implant therapy. Int J Oral Implantol Berl Ger 2021; 14 : 285–302. [Google Scholar]
  24. Sivolella S, Brunello G, Ferroni L, et al. A Novel In Vitro Technique for Assessing Dental Implant Osseointegration. Tissue Eng Part C Methods 2016 ; 22 : 132–141. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Roffel S, Wu G, Nedeljkovic I, et al. Evaluation of a novel oral mucosa in vitro implantation model for analysis of molecular interactions with dental abutment surfaces. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019 ; 21(Suppl 1): 25–33. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.