Free Access
Issue
Med Sci (Paris)
Volume 38, Number 8-9, Août-Septembre 2022
Page(s) 698 - 706
Section Repères
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/medsci/2022106
Published online 12 September 2022
  1. Verdier A, Kokou L, Feldmann L. Guide des doubles cursus en médecine et pharmacie. 2021. [Google Scholar]
  2. Scherlinger M, Bienvenu TCM, Piffoux M, Séguin P. Les doubles cursus médecine-sciences en France – État des lieux et perspectives. Med Sci (Paris) 2018 ; 34 : 464–472. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Lamour V, Bessereau JL, Thalabard JC, et al. Le réseau national des filières médecine-sciences. Med Sci (Paris) 2018 ; 34 : 462–463. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chakraverty D, Jeffe DB, Dabney KP, Tai RH. Exploring reasons that US MD/PhD students enter and leave their dual-degree programs. Int J Dr Stud 2020; 15 : 461–83. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kwan JM, Daye D, Schmidt ML, et al. Exploring intentions of physician-scientist trainees: factors influencing MD and MD/PhD interest in research careers. BMC Med Educ 2017 ; 17 : 115. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gourley DR, Rowell C, Wingate L, et al. Status of PharmD/PhD programs in colleges of pharmacy: the University of Tennessee dual PharmD/PhD program. Am J Pharm Educ 2006 ; 70 : 44. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ley TJ, Rosenberg LE. The physician-scientist career pipeline in 2005: build it, and they will come. Jama 2005 ; 294 : 1343–1351. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kosik RO, Tran DT, Fan AP, et al. Physician Scientist Training in the United States: A Survey of the Current Literature. Eval Health Prof 2016 ; 39 : 3–20. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Andriole DA, Whelan AJ, Jeffe DB. Characteristics and career intentions of the emerging MD/PhD workforce. Jama 2008 ; 300 : 1165–1173. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Brass LF, Akabas MH. The national MD-PhD program outcomes study: Relationships between medical specialty, training duration, research effort, and career paths. JCI Insight 2019; 4. [Google Scholar]
  11. Goldberg C, Insel PA. Preparing MD-PhD students for clinical rotations: navigating the interface between PhD and MD training. Acad Med 2013 ; 88 : 745–747. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Chakraverty D, Jeffe DB, Tai RH. Transition Experiences in MD-PhD Programs. CBE Life Sci Educ 2018; 17 : ar41. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Bossé D, Milger K, Morty RE. Clinician-scientist trainee: a German perspective. Clin Invest Med 2011 ; 34 : E324. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Dos Santos Rocha A, Scherlinger M, Ostermann L, et al. Characteristics and opinions of MD-PhD students and graduates from different European countries: a study from the European MD-PhD Association. Swiss Med Wkly 2020; 150 : w20205. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Cho M, Lee YS. Voluntary peer-mentoring program for undergraduate medical students: exploring the experiences of mentors and mentees. Korean J Med Educ 2021; 33 : 175–90. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Cheng K, Grabowski C, Chong A, et al. Initial Experience With Formal Near-Peer Mentoring in Radiology Residency. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 2022; 51(3):304–7. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Whye Lian C, Hazmi H, Hoo J, et al. Peer Mentoring Among Undergraduate Medical Students : Experience From Universiti Malaysia Sarawak. Education in Medicine Journal 2015; 7. [Google Scholar]
  18. Abdolalizadeh P, Pourhassan S, Gandomkar R, et al. Dual peer mentoring program for undergraduate medical students: exploring the perceptions of mentors and mentees. Med J Islam Repub Iran 2017 ; 31 : 2. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Callese TE, Keskinyan VS, Moses-Hampton M, et al. The Navigating Medical School Program: An innovative student-led near peer mentoring program for strengthening the medical school learning environment. Journal of Contemporary Medical Education 2019 ; 9 : 87–98. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Nimmons D, Giny S, Rosenthal J. Medical student mentoring programs: current insights. Adv Med Educ Pract 2019 ; 10 : 113–123. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.