Free Access
Issue |
Med Sci (Paris)
Volume 38, Number 4, Avril 2022
|
|
---|---|---|
Page(s) | 395 - 397 | |
Section | Repères | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/medsci/2022044 | |
Published online | 29 April 2022 |
- Mlinaric A, Horvat M, Smolcic VS. Dealing with the positive publication bias: why you should really publish your negative results. Biochem Med (Zagreb) 2017 ; 27 : 030201. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Derancourt C, Devos P, Moore N, Rouvillain JL. Modèle de valorisation des publications médicales scientifiques : le logiciel SIGAPS. Ann Dermatol Venereol 2014 ; 141 : 531–535. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Manzoli L, Flacco ME, D’Addario M, et al. Non-publication and delayed publication of randomized trials on vaccines: survey. BMJ 2014 ; 348 : g3058. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Duyx B, Urlings MJE, Swaen GMH, et al. Scientific citations favor positive results: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 2017 ; 88 : 92–101. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- All European Academies (2013). Code de conduite européen pour l’intégrité en recherche (édition révisée). www.allea.org/wpcontent/uploads/2018/01/FR_ALLEA_Code_de_conduite_europeen_pour_lintegrite_en_recherche.pdf [consulté le 5.12.2021]. [Google Scholar]
- Turner EH, Matthews AM, Linardatos E, et al. Selective publication of antidepressant trials and its influence on apparent efficacy. N Engl J Med 2008 ; 358 : 252–260. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kanza S, Willoughby C, Gibbins N, et al. Electronic lab notebooks: can they replace paper? J Cheminform 2017; 9: 31. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ivanov A, Kaczkowska BA, Khan SA, et al. Review and analysis of publication trends over three decades in three high impact medicine journals. PLoS One 2017 ; 12 : e0170056. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Benoit L. Qui veut gagner des points SIGAPS ? Med Sci (Paris) 2022; 38 : 215–7. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.