Open Access
Med Sci (Paris)
Volume 37, Number 12, Décembre 2021
Vésicules extracellulaires
Page(s) 1092 - 1100
Section Vésicules extracellulaires
Published online 20 December 2021
  1. Théry C, Witwer KW, Aikawa E, et al. Minimal information for studies of extracellular vesicles 2018 (MISEV2018): a position statement of the International Society for Extracellular Vesicles and update of the MISEV2014 guidelines. J Extracell Vesicles 2018 23; 7(1) : 1535750. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Stoorvogel W, Kleijmeer MJ, Geuze HJ, Raposo G. The biogenesis and functions of exosomes. Traffic 2002 ; 3 : 5321–330. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Kowal J, Arras G, Marina ColomboKowal Met al. Proteomic comparison defines novel markers to characterize heterogeneous populations of extracellular vesicle subtypes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2016 ; 113 : 8E968–E977. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. García-Romero N, Madurga R, Rackov Get al. Polyethylene glycol improves current methods for circulating extracellular vesicle-derived DNA isolation. J Transl Med 2019 ; 17 : 75. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chen J, Xu Y, Wang Xet al. Rapid and efficient isolation and detection of extracellular vesicles from plasma for lung cancer diagnosis. Lab Chip 2019 ; 19 : 3432–443. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Andreu Z, Yáñez-Mó M. Tetraspanins in extracellular vesicle formation and function. Front Immunol 2014 ; 5 : 442. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Mathieu M, Névo N, Mabel Jouve M, et al. Specificities of exosome versus small ectosome secretion revealed by live intracellular tracking of CD63 and CD9. Nat Commun 2021; 12(1) : 4389. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cordonnier M, Chanteloup G, Isambert Net al. Exosomes in cancer theranostic : Diamonds in the rough. Cell Adh Migr 2017 ; 11 : 2151–163. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Zhao W, Zhang L, Ye Y, et al. Microsphere mediated exosome isolation and ultra-sensitive detection on a dielectrophoresis integrated microfluidic device. Analyst 2021; 146(19) : 5962–72. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Liangsupree T, Multia E, Riekkola ML. Modern isolation and separation techniques for extracellular vesicles. J Chromatogr A 2021; 1636 : 461773. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Serrano-Pertierra E, Oliveira-Rodríguez M, Rivas Met al. Characterization of Plasma-Derived Extracellular Vesicles Isolated by Different Methods: A Comparison Study. Bioengineering (Basel) 2019 ; 6 : 18. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gardiner C, Di Vizio D, Sahoo Set al. Techniques used for the isolation and characterization of extracellular vesicles: results of a worldwide survey. J Extracell Vesicles 2016 ; 5 : 32945. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hartjes TA, Mytnyk S, Jenster GWet al. Extracellular Vesicle Quantification and Characterization: Common Methods and Emerging Approaches. Bioengineering (Basel) 2019 ; 6(1): 7. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Koliha N, Wiencek Y, Heider Uet al. A novel multiplex bead-based platform highlights the diversity of extracellular vesicles. J Extracell Vesicles 2016 ; 5 : 29975. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Baker ES, Livesay EA, Orton DJet al. An LC-IMS-MS platform providing increased dynamic range for high-throughput proteomic studies. J Proteome Res 2010 ; 9(2): 997–1006. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Rainville PD, Wilson ID, Nicholson JKet al. Ion mobility spectrometry combined with ultra performance liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry for metabolic phenotyping of urine: Effects of column length, gradient duration and ion mobility spectrometry on metabolite detection. Anal Chim Acta 2017 ; 982 : 1–8. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Dragovic RA, Gardiner C, Brooks ASet al. Sizing and phenotyping of cellular vesicles using Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis. Nanomedicine 2011 ; 7(6): 780–788. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Weatherall E, Willmott GR. Applications of tunable resistive pulse sensing. Analyst 2015 ; 140(10): 3318–3334. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Charoenviriyakul C, Takahashi Y, Morishita Met al. Role of Extracellular Vesicle Surface Proteins in the Pharmacokinetics of Extracellular Vesicles. Mol Pharm 2018 ; 15(3): 1073–1080. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Brisson AR, Tan S, Linares Ret al. Extracellular vesicles from activated platelets: a semiquantitative cryo-electron microscopy and immuno-gold labeling study. Platelets 2017 ; 28(3): 263–271. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Hardij J, Cecchet F, Berquand Aet al. Characterisation of tissue factor-bearing extracellular vesicles with AFM : comparison of air-tapping-mode AFM and liquid Peak Force AFM. J Extracell Vesicles 2013 ; 2 : 21045. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Jørgensen M, Bæk R, Pedersen Set al. Extracellular Vesicle (EV) Array: microarray capturing of exosomes and other extracellular vesicles for multiplexed phenotyping. J Extracell Vesicles 2013 ; 2 : 20920. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Malenica M, Vukomanovi´c M, Kurtjak M, et al. Perspectives of Microscopy Methods for Morphology Characterisation of Extracellular Vesicles from Human Biofluids. Biomedicines 2021; 9(6) : 603. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Ertsgaard CT, Wittenberg NJ, Klemme DJet al. Integrated Nanogap Platform for Sub-Volt Dielectrophoretic Trapping and Real-Time Raman Imaging of Biological Nanoparticles. Nano Lett 2018 ; 18 : 5946–5953. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Daaboul GG, Gagni P, Benussi Let al. Digital Detection of Exosomes by Interferometric Imaging. Sci Rep 2016 ; 6 : 37246. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Tu M, Wei F, Yang J, Wong D. Detection of exosomal biomarker by electric field-induced release and measurement (EFIRM). J Vis Exp 2015 ; 95 : 52439. [Google Scholar]
  27. Oliveira-Rodríguez M, López-Cobo S, Reyburn HTet al. Development of a rapid lateral flow immunoassay test for detection of exosomes previously enriched from cell culture medium and body fluids. J Extracell Vesicles 2016 ; 5 : 31803. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Maas SL, de Vrij J, van der Vlist EJ, et al. Possibilities and limitations of current technologies for quantification of biological extracellular vesicles and synthetic mimics. J Control Release 201. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.