Free Access
Med Sci (Paris)
Volume 37, Novembre 2021
Les Cahiers de Myologie
Page(s) 6 - 10
Section Prix SFM
Published online 08 December 2021
  1. Paulson H. Repeat expansion diseases. Handb Clin Neurol 2018 ; 147 : 105–123. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Johnson NE, Butterfield RJ, Mayne K, et al. Population-based prevalence of myotonic dystrophy type 1 using genetic analysis of statewide blood screening program. Neurology 2021; 96 : e1045–e1053. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Harper PS, Harley HG, Reardon W, Shaw DJ Anticipation in myotonic dystrophy: new light on an old problem. Am J Hum Genet 1992 ; 51 : 10–16. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. De Antonio M, Dogan C, Hamroun D, et al. Unravelling the myotonic dystrophy type 1 clinical spectrum: a systematic registry-based study with implications for disease classification. Rev Neurol (Paris) 2016 ; 172 : 572–580. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Tomé S, Gourdon G. DM1 Phenotype variability and triplet repeat instability: challenges in the development of new therapies. Int J Mol Sci 2020; 21 : E457. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ashizawa T, Anvret M, Baiget M, et al. Characteristics of intergenerational contractions of the CTG repeat in myotonic dystrophy. Am J Hum Genet 1994 ; 54 : 414–423. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Morales F, Couto JM, Higham CF, et al. Somatic instability of the expanded CTG triplet repeat in myotonic dystrophy type 1 is a heritable quantitative trait and modifier of disease severity. Hum Mol Genet 2012 ; 21 : 3558–3567. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Pearson CE, Edamura KN, Cleary JD Repeat instability: mechanisms of dynamic mutations. Nat Rev Genet 2005 ; 6 : 729–742. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Savouret C, Brisson E, Essers J, et al. CTG repeat instability and size variation timing in DNA repair-deficient mice. EMBO J 2003 ; 22 : 2264–2273. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Foiry L, Dong L, Savouret C, et al. Msh3 is a limiting factor in the formation of intergenerational CTG expansions in DM1 transgenic mice. Hum Genet 2006 ; 119 : 520–526. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Santillan BA, Moye C, Mittelman D, Wilson JH GFP-based fluorescence assay for cag repeat instability in cultured human cells. PLoS One 2014 ; 9 : e113952. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Prestwick Chemical. The Prestwick chemical library, a collection of approved drugs. (consulté le 25/09/2021). [Google Scholar]
  13. Mangin A, de Pontual L, Tsai Yu-Chih, et al. Robust detection of somatic mosaicism and repeat interruptions by long-read targeted sequencing in myotonic dystrophy type 1. IJMS 2021; 22 : 2616. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Procedure and Checklist - Preparing SMRTbell libraries using PacBio Barcoded Universal primers for multiplexing amplicons. PacBio, Menlo Park, CA, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  15. Gourdon G, Radvanyi F, Lia AS, et al. Moderate intergenerational and somatic instability of a 55-CTG repeat in transgenic mice. Nat Genet 1997 ; 15 : 190–192. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Seznec H, Lia-Baldini AS, Duros C, et al. Transgenic mice carrying large human genomic sequences with expanded CTG repeat mimic closely the DM CTG repeat intergenerational and somatic instability. Hum Mol Genet 2000 ; 9 : 1185–1194. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.