Open Access
Med Sci (Paris)
Volume 37, Number 8-9, Août–Septembre 2021
Page(s) 774 - 778
Section M/S Revues
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/medsci/2021092
Published online 07 September 2021
  1. Joly PB. On the economics of techno-scientific promises. In: Akrich M, Barthe Y, Muniesa F, Mustar P, eds.Débordements. Mélanges offerts à Michel Callon. Paris: Presse des Mines 2010: 203–222. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Wild CP. Complementing the genome with an exposome: the outstanding challenge of environmental exposure measurement in molecular epidemiology. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2005 ; 14 : 1847–1850. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Jégou B. Le paradigme de l’exposome : définition, contexte et perspective. Med Sci (Paris) 2020; 36 : 959–60. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Rappaport SM. Implications of the exposome for exposure science. J Exp Sci Environ Epidemiol 2011 ; 21 : 5–9. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Vandenbroucke JP. Is the causes of cancer a miasma theory for the end of the twentieth century?. Int J Epidemiol 1988 ; 17 : 708–709. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Skrabanek P.. The emptiness of the black box. Epidemiology 1994 ; 5 : 553–555. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Russo F, Williamson J. Interpreting causality in the health sciences. Int Stud Philos Sci 2007 ; 21 : 157–170. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Le Slama R.mal du dehors : l’influence de l’environnement sur la santé. ParisQuae, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  9. Rappaport SM, Smith MT. Environment and disease risks. Science 2010 ; 330 : 460–461. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Wild CP. The exposome: from concept to utility. Int J Epidemiol 2012 ; 41 : 24–32. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Miller GW, Jones DP. The nature of nurture: refining the definition of the exposome. Toxicol Sci 2014 ; 137 : 1–2. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Rappaport SM. Redefining environmental exposure for disease etiology. NPJ Syst Biol Appl 2018 ; 4 : 30. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Vineis P.From John Snow to omics: the long journey of environmental epidemiology. Eur J Epidemiol 2018 ; 33 : 355–363. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kuh DL, Ben-Shlomo Y. A life course approach to chronic disease epidemiology: tracing the origins of ill-health from early to adult life. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  15. Barker DJ, Osmond C, Golding J, et al. Growth in utero, blood pressure in childhood and adult life, and mortality from cardiovascular disease. BMJ 1989 ; 298 : 56467. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Canali S.Evaluating evidential pluralism in epidemiology: mechanistic evidence in exposome research. Hist Philos Life Sci 2019 ; 41 : 4. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Canali S. What is new about the exposome? exploring scientific change in contemporary epidemiology. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2020; 17 : 2879. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Maitre L, de Bont J, Casas M, et al. Human early life exposome (HELIX) study: a european population-based exposome cohort. BMJ Open 2018 ; 8 : e021311. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Turner MC, Vineis P, Seleiro E, et al. EXPOsOMICS: final policy workshop and stakeholder consultation. BMC Public Health 2018 ; 18 : 260. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Wild CP, Scalbert A, Herceg Z. Measuring the exposome: a powerful basis for evaluating environmental exposures and cancer risk. Environ Mol Mutagen 2013 ; 54 : 480–499. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Prior L, Manley D, Sabel CE. Biosocial health geography: new exposomic geographies of health and place. Prog Hum Geograph 2019 ; 43 : 531–552. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Woodward J.Mechanisms revisited. Synthese 2011 ; 183 : 409–427. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Cavalin C. Exposome et sciences sociales : la promesse d’une rencontre ? Encyclopédie de l’Environnement 2018. http://www.encyclopedie-environnement.org/?p=6379. [Google Scholar]
  24. Shostak S, Moinester M. The missing piece of the puzzle? Measuring the environment in the postgenomic moment. In: Hallam S, Richardson SS, eds. Postgenomics. Perspectives on biology after the genome. Durham : Duke University Press, 2015 : 192-209. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Niewöhner J.Epigenetics: Embedded bodies and the molecularisation of biography and milieu. BioSocieties 2011 ; 6 : 279–298. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Shostak S.Exposed science: genes, the environment, and the politics of population health. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2013: 202. [Google Scholar]
  27. Meloni M, Testa G. Scrutinizing the epigenetics revolution. In: Meloni M, Cromby J, Fitzgerald D, Lloyd S, eds. The Palgrave handbook of biology and society. Londres : Palgrave, 2018; 191225 : 216. [Google Scholar]
  28. Guchet X. De la médecine personnalisée à l’exposomique. Environnement et santé à l’ère des big data. Multitudes 2019; 75 : 72–80. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Vineis P, Avendano-Pabon M, Barros H, et al. The Biology of Inequalities in Health: The LIFEPATH Project. Longitud Life Course Stud 2017 ; 8 : 417–449. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Kelly-Irving M, Delpierre C. The embodiment dynamic over the life course: a case for examining cancer aetiology. In Meloni M, Cromby J, Fitzgerald D, Lloyd S eds. The Palgrave handbook of biology and society. Londres: Palgrave, 2018 ; 519–540. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. Krieger N. Embodiment: a conceptual glossary for epidemiology. J Epidemiol Community Health 2005 ; 59 : 350–355. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Delpierre C, Castagné R, Lang T, Kelly-Irving M. Environnement social, incorporation biologique et inégalités sociales de santé. Med Sci (Paris) 2018 ; 34 : 740–744. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Ghiara V, Russo F. Reconstructing the mixed mechanisms of health: the role of bio-and sociomarkers. Longitud Life Course Stud 2019 ; 10 : 7–25. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.