Open Access
| Issue |
Med Sci (Paris)
Volume 36, Number 5, Mai 2020
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Page(s) | 535 - 537 | |
| Section | Forum | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/medsci/2020088 | |
| Published online | 26 May 2020 | |
- Jordan B. Balayage du génome et repérage des personnes à risque : des GWAS aux GPS. Med Sci (Paris) 2018 ; 34 : 1116–1122. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liyanarachchi S, Gudmundsson J, Ferkingstad E, et al. Assessing thyroid cancer risk using polygenic risk scores. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2020; 117 : 5997–6002. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Risch N. The genetic epidemiology of cancer: interpreting family and twin studies and their implications for molecular genetic approaches. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2001 ; 10 : 733–741. [Google Scholar]
- Hin´cza K, Kowalik A, Kowalska A. Current knowledge of germline genetic risk factors for the development of non-medullary thyroid cancer. Genes (Basel) 2019; 10. pii: E482. [Google Scholar]
- Figlioli G, Elisei R, Romei C, et al. A comprehensive meta-analysis of case-control association studies to evaluate polymorphisms associated with the risk of differentiated thyroid Carcinoma. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2016 ; 25 : 700–713. [Google Scholar]
- Jordan B. Les tests génétiques grand public ont-ils une utilité clinique ?. Med Sci (Paris) 2012 ; 28 : 325–328. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Guochong Jia, Yingchang Lu, Wanqing Wen, et al. Evaluating the utility of polygenic risk scores in identifying high-risk individuals for eight common cancers. JNCI Cancer Spectrum 2020, pkaa021. https://doi.org/10.1093/jncics/pkaa021. [Google Scholar]
- Regalado, A. 23andMe thinks polygenic risk scores are ready for the masses, but experts aren’t so sure. MIT Technology Review, 8 mars 2019. https://www.technologyreview.com/s/613095/23andme-thinks-polygenic-risk-scores-are-ready-for-the-masses-but-experts-arent-so-sure/. [Google Scholar]
- Jordan B. Scores polygéniques : vers l’embryon à la carte ? Med Sci (Paris) 2020; 36 : 289–91. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.