Free Access
Med Sci (Paris)
Volume 35, Number 4, Avril 2019
Page(s) 356 - 363
Section Repères
Published online 30 April 2019
  1. Büchler A, Parizer K. Maternal age in the regulation of reproductive medicine. A comparative study. Int J Law Policy Family 2017 ; 31 : 269-90. [Google Scholar]
  2. Wainwright J, Russel S, Patterson C. Psychosocial adjustment, school outcomes, and romantic relationships of adolescents with same-sex parents. Child Dev 2004 ; 75 : 1886-98. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Anderssen N, Amlie C, Ytteroy Erling A. Outcomes for children with lesbian or gay parents. A review of studies from 1978 to 2000. Scand J Psychol 2002 ; 43 : 335-51. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Golombok S. New families, old values : considerations regarding the welfare of the child. Hum Reprod 1998 ; 13 : 2342-7. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chan R, Raboy B, Pattersen C. Psychological adjustment among children conceived via donor insemination by lesbian and heterosexual mothers. Child Dev 1998 ; 69 : 443-57. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Pattersen C. Children of lesbian and gay parents. Child Dev 1992 ; 63 : 1025-42. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Golombok S, Tasker F. Do parents influence the sexual orientation of their children? Findings from a longitudinal study of lesbian families. Dev Psychol 1996 ; 32 : 3-11. [Google Scholar]
  8. Büchler A, Parizer K. Parental rights of female same-sex couples regarding their children conceived through assisted reproductive technologies (ART). A comparative study of legal frameworks. Jusletter (Familienrecht, Eherecht), 17 September 2018. ONCE [Google Scholar]
  9. Shkedi-Rafid S, Hashiloni-Dolev Y. Egg freezing for age-related fertility decline : preventive medicine or a further medicalization of reproduction? Analyzing the new Israeli policy. Fertil Steril 2011 ; 96 : 291-4. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Wyndham N, Marin Figueira B, Patrizio P. A persistent misperception : assisted reproductive technology can reverse the ‘aged biological clock’. Fertil Steril 2012 ; 97 : 1044-7. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Baldwin K, Culley L, Hudson N, et al. Oocyte cryopreservation for social reasons : demographic profile and disposal intentions of UK users. Reprod Biomed Online 2015 ; 31 : 239-45. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Waldby C. Banking time : egg freezing and the negotiation of future fertility. Cult Health Sex 2015 ; 17 : 470-82. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. David G. Don de sperme : le lien entre l’anonymat et le bénévolat. Andrologie 2010 ; 20 : 63-7. [Google Scholar]
  14. Hermitte M-A. Le sang et le droit. Essai sur la transfusion sanguine. Paris : Seuil, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  15. Titmuss R. The gift relationship. From human blood to social Policy. New York : Vintage Books, 1972. [Google Scholar]
  16. Théry I. Des humains comme les autres. Bioéthique, anonymat et genre du don. Paris : EHESS, 2010. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Parizer-Krief K. Étude comparative du droit de l’assistance médicale à la procréation - France, Allemagne et Grande-Bretagne. Marseille : Presses universitaires d’Aix-Marseille, 2016. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.