EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
Home All issues Volume 32 / No 11 (Novembre 2016) Med Sci (Paris), 32 11 (2016) 937-943 References
Free Access
Issue
Med Sci (Paris)
Volume 32, Number 11, Novembre 2016
Le microbiote : cet inconnu qui réside en nous
Page(s) 937 - 943
Section Le microbiote : cet inconnu qui réside en nous
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/medsci/20163211008
Published online 23 December 2016
  1. Whitman WB, Coleman DC, Wiebe WJ. Prokaryotes: the unseen majority. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998 ; 95 : 6578–6583. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Iriberri J, Herndl GJ. Formation and microbial utilization of amorphous aggregates in the sea: Ecological significance. Microbiologia 1995 ; 11 : 309–322. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Staley JT, Konopka A. Measurement of in situ activities of nonphotosynthetic microorganisms in aquatic and terrestrial habitats. Annu Rev Microbiol 1985 ; 39 : 321–346. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Woese CR, Kandler O, Wheelis ML. Towards a natural system of organisms: Proposal for the domains archaea, bacteria, and eucarya. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1990 ; 87 : 4576–4579. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Olsen GJ, Lane DJ, Giovannoni SJ, et al. Microbial ecology and evolution: a ribosomal RNA approach. Annu Rev Microbiol 1986 ; 40 : 337–365. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Romby P, Marzi S, Westhof E. La structure atomique du ribosome en pleine lumière. Prix Nobel de Chimie 2009 à Venkatraman Ramakrishnan, Thomas A. Steitz et Ada E. Yonath. Med Sci (Paris) 2009 ; 25 : 977–981. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dauga C, Doré J, Sghir A. La diversité insoupçonnée du monde microbien. Med Sci (Paris) 2005 ; 21 : 290–296. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Amann RI, Ludwig W. Schleifer KH Phylogenetic identification and in situ detection of individual microbial cells without cultivation. Microbiol Rev 1995 ; 59 : 143–169. [Google Scholar]
  9. Colwell RR. Viable but nonculturable bacteria, a survival strategy. J Infect Chemother 2000 ; 6 : 121–125. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Tanaka Y, Hanada S, Manome A, et al. Catellibacterium nectariphilum gen. Nov., sp. Nov., which requires a diffusible compound from a strain related to the genus Sphingomonas for vigorous growth. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2004 ; 54 : 955–959. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lennon JT. Jones SE Microbial seed banks: the ecological and evolutionary implications of dormancy. Nat Rev Microbiol 2011 ; 9 : 119–130. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Perna NT, Plunkett G, 3rd, Burland V, et al. Genome sequence of enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7. Nature 2001 ; 409 : 529–533. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Daubin V, Abby SS. Les transferts horizontaux de gènes et l’arbre de la vie. Med Sci (Paris) 2012 ; 28 : 695–698. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Vernikos G, Medini D, Riley DR, Tettelin H. Ten years of pan-genome analyses. Curr Opin Microbiol 2015 ; 23 : 148–154. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Handelsman J. Metagenomics: application of genomics to uncultured microorganisms. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2004 ; 68 : 669–685. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Burcelin R, Chabo C, Blasco-Baque V, et al. Le microbiote intestinal à l’origine de nouvelles perspectives thérapeutiques pour les maladies métaboliques ?. Med Sci (Paris) 2013 ; 29 : 800–806. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Cani PD, Everard A. Akkermansia muciniphila : une nouvelle cible pour contrôler l’obésité, le diabète de type 2 et l’inflammation ?. Med Sci (Paris) 2014 ; 30 : 125–127. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Andrejak C, Delhaes L. Le microbiome pulmonaire en 2015: une fenêtre ouverte sur les pathologies pulmonaires chroniques. Med Sci (Paris) 2015 ; 31 : 971–978. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Audebert C, Hot D, Lemoine Y, Caboche S. Le séquençage haut-débit : vers un diagnostic basé sur la séquence complète du génome de l’agent infectieux. Med Sci (Paris) 2014 ; 30 : 1144–1151. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. El Kaoutari A, Armougom F, Raoult D, Henrissat B. Le microbiote intestinal et la digestion des polysaccharides. Med Sci (Paris) 2014 ; 30 : 259–265. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Sharpton TJ. An introduction to the analysis of shotgun metagenomic data. Front Plant Sci 2014 ; 5 : 209. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Handelsman J, Rondon MR, Brady SF, et al. Molecular biological access to the chemistry of unknown soil microbes: A new frontier for natural products. Chem Biol 1998 ; 5 : R245–R249. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Qin J, Li R, Raes J, et al. A human gut microbial gene catalogue established by metagenomic sequencing. Nature 2010 ; 464 : 59–65. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Lozupone CA, Stombaugh JI, Gordon JI, et al. Diversity, stability and resilience of the human gut microbiota. Nature 2012 ; 489 : 220–230. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Li J, Jia H, Cai X, et al. An integrated catalog of reference genes in the human gut microbiome. Nat Biotechnol 2014 ; 32 : 834–841. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Sunagawa S, Coelho LP, Chaffron S, et al. Ocean plankton. Structure and function of the global ocean microbiome. Science 2015 ; 348 : 1261359. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Yooseph S, Sutton G, Rusch DB, et al. The Sorcerer ii global ocean sampling expedition: expanding the universe of protein families. PLoS Biol 2007 ; 5 : e16. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Jetten MS, Strous M, van de Pas-Schoonen KT, et al. The anaerobic oxidation of ammonium. FEMS Microbiol Rev 1998 ; 22 : 421–437. [Google Scholar]
  29. Ettwig KF, Butler MK, Le Paslier D, et al. Nitrite-driven anaerobic methane oxidation by oxygenic bacteria. Nature 2010 ; 464 : 543–548. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Kyrpides NC. Fifteen years of microbial genomics, meeting the challenges and fulfilling the dream. Nat Biotechnol 2009 ; 27 : 627–632. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Turroni F, Marchesi JR, Foroni E, et al. Microbiomic analysis of the bifidobacterial population in the human distal gut. Isme J 2009 ; 3 : 745–751. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Aslam Z, Yasir M, Yoon HS, et al. Diversity of the bacterial community in the rice rhizosphere managed under conventional and no-tillage practices. J Microbiol 2013 ; 51 : 747–756. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Nam YD, Chang HW, Kim KH, et al. Bacterial, archaeal, and eukaryal diversity in the intestines of korean people. J Microbiol 2008 ; 46 : 491–501. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Bartram AK, Lynch MD, Stearns JC, et al. Generation of multimillion-sequence 16s rRNA gene libraries from complex microbial communities by assembling paired-end illumina reads. Appl Environ Microbiol 2011 ; 77 : 3846–3852. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Gloor GB, Hummelen R, Macklaim JM, et al. Microbiome profiling by Illumina sequencing of combinatorial sequence-tagged PCR products. PLoS One 2010 ; 5 : e15406. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Sogin ML, Morrison HG, Huber JA, et al. Microbial diversity in the deep sea and the underexplored rare biosphere. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006 ; 103 : 12115–12120. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. Gibson GR, Cummings JH, Macfarlane GT. Use of a three-stage continuous culture system to study the effect of mucin on dissimilatory sulfate reduction and methanogenesis by mixed populations of human gut bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 1988 ; 54 : 2750–2755. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Jarrell KF, Walters AD, Bochiwal C, et al. Major players on the microbial stage: why archaea are important. Microbiology 2011 ; 157 : 919–936. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. St-Pierre B. Wright AD Diversity of gut methanogens in herbivorous animals. Animal 2013 ; 1 : 49–56. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. Ohkuma M. Symbioses of flagellates and prokaryotes in the gut of lower termites. Trends Microbiol 2008 ; 16 : 345–352. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Smits LP, Bouter KE, de Vos WM, et al. Therapeutic potential of fecal microbiota transplantation. Gastroenterology 2013 ; 145 : 946–953. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Agrawal M, Aroniadis OC, Brandt LJ, et al. The long-term efficacy and safety of fecal microbiota transplant for recurrent, severe, and complicated Clostridium difficile infection in 146 elderly individuals. J Clin Gastroenterol 2016 ; 50 : 403–407. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Le Chatelier E, Nielsen T, Qin J, et al. Richness of human gut microbiome correlates with metabolic markers. Nature 2013 ; 500 : 541–546. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Lederberg J. McCray AT Ome sweet omics: a genealogical treasury of words. Scientist 2001 ; 15 : 8. [Google Scholar]
  45. Burcelin R, Nicolas S, Blasco-Baque V. Microbiotes et maladies métaboliques : de nouveaux concepts pour de nouvelles stratégies thérapeutiques. Med Sci (Paris) 2016 ; 32 : 952–960. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Lagier JC, Raoult D. Culturomics : une méthode d’étude du microbiote humain. Med Sci (Paris) 2016 ; 32 : 923–925. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Lagier JC, Raoult D. Greffe de microbiote fécal et infections : mise au point, perspectives. Med Sci (Paris) 2016 ; 32 : 991–997. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Gaboriau-Routhiau V, Cerf-Bensussan N. Microbiote intestinal et développement du système immunitaire. Med Sci (Paris) 2016 ; 32 : 961–967. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Le Chassaing B. microbiote intestinal, un acteur de la réponse immunitaire adaptative antivirale ?. Med Sci (Paris) 2015 ; 31 : 355–357. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.