Med Sci (Paris)
Volume 32, Number 10, Octobre 2016
Nos jeunes pousses ont du talent !
Page(s) 830 - 832
Section Nouvelles
Published online 19 October 2016
  1. Ciccia A, Elledge SJ. The DNA damage response: making it safe to play with knives. Mol Cell 2010 ; 40 : 179–204. [Google Scholar]
  2. Stracker TH, Carson CT, Weitzman MD. Adenovirus oncoproteins inactivate the Mte11-Rad50-NbS1 DNA repair complex. Nature 2002 ; 418 : 348–352. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Forrester NA, Sedgwick GG, Thomas A, et al. Serotype-specific inactivation of the cellular DNA damage response during adenovirus infection. J Virol 2011 ; 85 : 2201–2211. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Blackford AN, Bruton RK, Dirlik O, et al. A role for E1B-AP5 in ATR signaling pathways during adenovirus infection. J Virol 2008 ; 82 : 7640–7652. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Nichols GJ, Schaack J, Ornelles DA. Widespread phosphorylation of histone H2AX by species C adenovirus infection requires viral DNA replication. J Virol 2009 ; 83 : 5987–5998. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Shah GA, O’Shea C. Viral and cellular genomes activate distinct DNA damage responses. Cell 2015 ; 162 : 987–1002. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Brozostek-Racine S, Gordon C, Van Scy S, Reich NC. The DNA damage response induces IFN. J Immunol 2011 ; 187 : 5336–5345. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.