EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
Home All issues Volume 32 / No 5 (Mai 2016) Med Sci (Paris), 32 5 (2016) 500-505 References
Free Access
Issue
Med Sci (Paris)
Volume 32, Number 5, Mai 2016
Page(s) 500 - 505
Section Repères
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/medsci/20163205018
Published online 25 May 2016
  1. Susser M, Susser E. Choosing a future for epidemiology. I. Eras and paradigms. Am J Public Health 1996 ; 86 : 668–673. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Susser M, Susser E. Choosing a future for epidemiology. II. From black box to Chinese boxes and eco-epidemiology. Am J Public Health 1996 ; 86 : 674–677. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Doll R, Hill AB. Smoking and carcinoma of the lung. Br Med J 1950 ; 2 : 739–748. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Schwartz S, Susser E, Susser M. A future for epidemiology ? Annu Rev Public Health 1999 ; 20 : 15–33. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. MacMahon B, Pugh TF, Ipsen J. Epidemiologic methods. Boston : Little Brown and Co, 1960. [Google Scholar]
  6. Greenland S, Gago-Dominguez M, Castelao JE. The value of risk-factor (black box) epidemiology. Epidemiology 2004 ; 15 : 529–535. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Krieger N. Theorises for social epidemiology in the 21st century: an ecosocial perspective. Int J Epidemiol 2001 ; 30 : 668–677. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. McMichael AJ. Prisoners of the proximate: loosening the constraints on epidemiology in an age of change. Am J Epidemiol 1999 ; 149 : 887–897. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Morris JN. Uses of epidemiology. Br Med J 1955 ; 2 : 395–401. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Schwartz S, Carpenter KM. The right answer for the wrong question: consequences of type III error for public health research. Am J Public Health 1999 ; 89 : 1175–1180. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Rose G. Sick individuals and sick populations. Int J Epidemiol 1985 ; 14 : 32–38. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Rockhill B. The privatization of risk. Am J Public Health 2001 ; 91 : 365–368. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Blakely T, Woodward AJ. Ecological effects in multi-level studies. J Epidemiol Community Health 2000 ; 54 : 367–374. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Diez-Roux AV, Aiello AE. Multilevel analysis of infectious diseases. J Infect Dis 2005 ; 191 (suppl 1) : S25–S33. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Galea S, Riddle M, Kaplan GA. Causal thinking and complex system approaches in epidemiology. Int J Epidemiol 2010 ; 39 : 97–106. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Ottman R. Gene-environment interactions: definitions and study designs. Prev Med 1996 ; 25 : 764–770. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kraft P, Hunter D. Integrating epidemiology and genetic association: the challenge of gene-environment interaction. Phil Trans R Soc 2005 ; 360 : 1609–1616. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ober C, Vercelli D. Gene-environment interactions in human disease: nuisance or opportunity? Trends Genet 2011 ; 27 : 107–115. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Karg K, Burmeister M, Shedden K, Sen S. The serotonin transporter promoter variant (5-HTTLPR), stress, and depression meta-analysis revisited. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2011 ; 68 : 444–454. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Ben-Shlomo Y, Kuh D. A life course approach to chronic disease epidemiology: conceptual models, empirical challenges and interdisciplinary perspectives. Int J Epidemiol 2002 ; 31 : 285–293. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Nkondjock A, Ghadirian P. Facteurs de risque du cancer du sein. Med Sci (Paris) 2005 ; 21 : 175–180. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Eriksson JG, Forsen T, Tuomilehto J, et al. Early growth and coronary heart disease in later life: longitudinal study. Br Med J 2001 ; 322 : 949–953. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Frankel S, Elwood P, Sweetnam P, et al. Birthweight, body mass index in middle age and incident coronary heart disease. Lancet 1996 ; 248 : 1478–1480. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kirkbride JB, Susser E, Kundakovich M, et al. Prenatal nutrition, epigenetics and schizophrenia risk: can we test causal effects? Epigenomics 2012 ; 4 : 303–315. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Pearce N, Merletti F. Complexity, simplicity, and epidemiology. Int J Epidemiol 2006 ; 35 : 515–519. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Barabasi AL. Network medicine: from obesity to the diseasome. N Engl J Med 2007 ; 357 : 404–407. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Jayasinghe S. Conceptualising population health: from mechanistic thinking to complexity science. Emerg Themes Epidemiol 2011 ; 8 : 2. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Diez-Roux AV. Bringing context back into epidemiology: variables and fallacies in multilevel analysis. Am J Public Health 1998 ; 88 : 216–222. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Koopman JS, Lynch JW. Individual causal models and population system models in epidemiology. Am J Public Health 1999 ; 89 : 1170–1174. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Diez-Roux AV. Complex systems thinking and current impasses in health disparities research. Am J Public Health 2011 ; 101 : 1627–1634. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Philippe P, Mansi O. Nonlinearity in the epidemiology of complex health and disease processes. Theor Med Bioeth 1998 ; 19 : 591–607. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Leclerc BS. L’épidémiologie contemporaine en crise de paradigme. Ruptures 2005 ; 10 : 178–198. [Google Scholar]
  33. Susser E. Eco-epidemiology: thinking outside the black box. Epidemiology 2004 ; 15 : 519–520. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. March D, Susser E. The eco- in eco-epidemiology. Int J Epidemiol 2006 ; 35 : 1379–1383. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.