Free Access
Issue
Med Sci (Paris)
Volume 30, Number 12, Décembre 2014
Page(s) 1061 - 1063
Section Nouvelles
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/medsci/20143012002
Published online 24 December 2014
  1. Deng L, Trepat X, Butler JP, et al. Fast and slow dynamics of the cytoskeleton. Nat Mater 2006 ; 5 : 636–640. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Paluch E, Heisenberg CP. Biology and physics of cell shape development in the cytoskeleton. Curr Biol 2009 ; 19 : R790–R799. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Gardel ML, Schneider IC, Aratyn-Schaus Y, Waterman CM. Mechanical integration of actin and adhesion dynamics in cell migration. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 2010 ; 26 : 315–333. [Google Scholar]
  4. Lecuit T, Lenne PF, Munro E. Force generation, transmission, and integration during cell and tissue morphogenesis. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 2011 ; 27 : 157–184. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Lombardi ML, Jaalouk DE, Shanahan CM, et al. The interaction between nesprins and sun proteins at the nuclear envelope is critical for force transmission between the nucleus and cytoskeleton. J Biol Chem 2011 ; 286 : 26743–26753. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Swift J, Ivanovska IL, Buxboim A., et al. Nuclear lamin-A scales with tissue stiffness, enhances matrix-directed differentiation. Science 2013 ; 341 : 1240104. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kind J, Pagie L, Ortabozkoyun H, et al. Single-cell dynamics of genome-nuclear lamina interactions. Cell 2013 ; 153 : 178–192. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Pagliara S, Franze K, McClain CR, et al. Auxetic nuclei in embryonic stem cells exiting pluripotency. Nat Mater 2014 ; 13 : 638–644. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Pajerowski JD, Dahl KN, Zhong FL, et al. Physical plasticity of the nucleus in stem cell differentiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007 ; 104 : 15619–15624. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bickmore WA, van Steensel B. Genome architecture: domain organization of interphase chromosomes. Cell 2013 ; 152 : 1270–1284. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Nagano T, Lubling Y, Stevens TJ, et al. Single-cell Hi-C reveals cell-to-cell variability in chromosome structure. Nature 2013 ; 502 : 59–64. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Ying QL, Wray J, Nichols J, et al. The ground state of embryonic stem cell self-renewal. Nature 2008 ; 453, 519–523. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Chalut KJ, Höpfler M, Lautenschläger F, et al. Chromatin decondensation and nuclear softening accompany Nanog downregulation in embryonic stem cells. Biophys J 2012 ; 103, 2060–2070. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. K. E. Evans and A. Alderson. Auxetic materials: Functional materials and structures from lateral thinking! Adv Mater 2000 ; 12 : 617–623. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Umlauf D. Le génome intime… et en trois dimensions. Med Sci (Paris) 2014 (sous presse). [Google Scholar]
  16. Kieffer E, Kuntz S, Viville S. Tour d’horizon des lignées de cellules souches pluripotentes. Med Sci (Paris) 2010 ; 26 : 848–854. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.