EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
Home All issues Volume 28 / No 11 (Novembre 2012) Med Sci (Paris), 28 11 (2012) 993-999 References
Issue
Med Sci (Paris)
Volume 28, Number 11, Novembre 2012
Lames virtuelles en pathologie
Page(s) 993 - 999
Section M/S Revues
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/medsci/20122811021
Published online 12 November 2012
  1. Dietel M, Nguyen-Dobinsky TN, Hufnagl P. The UICC telepathology consultation center. International union against cancer. A global approach to improving consultation for pathologists in cancer diagnosis. Cancer 2000 ; 89 : 187–191. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Nakhleh RE, Bekeris LG, Souers RJ, et al. Surgical pathology case reviews before sign-out : a college of American pathologists Q-probes study of 45 laboratories. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2010 ; 134 : 740–743. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Programme québécois d’assurance-qualité en anatomopathologie. Ministère de la santé et des services sociaux du Québec, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  4. HAS. 2e lecture en anatomie et cytologie pathologiques (acp). Note de cadrage, 2009. Service Évaluation des actes professionnels. Paris, France : Haute autorité de santé, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  5. Canada’s population estimates. Ottawa, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  6. Ford JC. If not, why not? Reasons why Canadian postgraduate trainees chose - or did not choose - to become pathologists. Hum Pathol 2010 ; 41 : 566–573. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cameron MA. Commission of inquiry on hormone receptor testing, volume 1 : Investigation and findings. Government of Newfoundland and Labrador office of the Queen’s printer department of government services, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  8. Creaghan P. Commission of inquiry into pathology services at the Miramichi regional health authority. Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  9. Pantanowitz L, Valenstein PN, Evans AJ, et al. Review of the current state of whole slide imaging in pathology. J Pathol Inform 2011 ; 2 : 36. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Williams S, Henricks WH, Becich MJ, et al. Telepathology for patient care : what am I getting myself into? Adv Anat Pathol 2010 ; 17 : 130–149. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Evans AJ, Chetty R, Clarke BA, et al. Primary frozen section diagnosis by robotic microscopy and virtual slide telepathology : the university health network experience. Hum Pathol 2009 ; 40 : 1070–1081. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Fallon MA, Wilbur DC, Prasad M. Ovarian frozen section diagnosis : use of whole-slide imaging shows excellent correlation between virtual slide and original interpretations in a large series of cases. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2010 ; 134 : 1020–1023. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hitchcock CL. The future of telepathology for the developing world. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2011 ; 135 : 211–214. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Gould PV, Saikali S. A comparison of digitized frozen section and smear preparations for intraoperative neurotelepathology. Anal Cell Pathol (Amst) 2011 ; 13 septembre (online). [Google Scholar]
  15. Nordrum I, Engum B, Rinde E, et al. Remote frozen section service : a telepathology project in northern Norway. Hum Pathol 1991 ; 22 : 514–518. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Sawai T, Uzuki M, Kamataki A, Tofukuji I., The state of telepathology in Japan. J Pathol Inform 2010 ; 1 : 13. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hutarew G, Schlicker HU, Idriceanu C, et al. Four years experience with teleneuropathology. J Telemed Telecare 2006 ; 12 : 387–391. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Pagni F, Bono F, Di Bella C, et al. Virtual surgical pathology in underdeveloped countries : the Zambia project. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2011 ; 135 : 215–219. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Horbinski C, Wiley CA. Comparison of telepathology systems in neuropathological intraoperative consultations. Neuropathology 2009 ; 29 : 655–663. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Quebec telepathology project aims to be the largest in Canada. Healthcare Technology 2010 ; 15 : 13. [Google Scholar]
  21. Plan de développement de la télésanté au RUIS-UL. 2005. [Google Scholar]
  22. Têtu B, Boulanger J, Houde C. Le projet de télépathologie sur lames virtuelles de Q1 l’est du Québec : un projet clinique déployé sur 21 sites. Ann Pathol 2010 ; 30 : 25–27. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Paquet E. La télépathologie évite une rupture de services à Sept-Îles. Le Nord-Est 2011 ; 17 août (online). [Google Scholar]
  24. Têtu B, Fortin JP, Gagnon MP, Louahlia S. The challenges of implementing a patient-oriented telepathology network. The Eastern Quebec telepathology project experience. Anal Cell Pathol (Amst) 2011 ; 9 septembre (online). [Google Scholar]
  25. Brousset P, Delsol G. Émergence d’une spécialité médicale nouvelle : la pathologie. Med Sci (Paris) 2011 ; 27 : 651–655. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Ameisen D, Le Naour G, Daniel C. Technologie des lames virtuelles : de la numérisation à la mise en ligne. Med Sci (Paris) 2012 ; 28 : 977–982. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.