Issue
Med Sci (Paris)
Volume 28, Number 11, Novembre 2012
Lames virtuelles en pathologie
Page(s) 983 - 985
Section M/S Revues
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/medsci/20122811018
Published online 12 November 2012
  1. Brousset P, Delsol G. Émergence d’une spécialité médicale nouvelle : la pathologie. Med Sci (Paris) 2011 ; 27 : 651–655. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Têtu B, Boulanger J, Houde C, et al. Le réseau de télépathologie de l’Est du Québec : un véritable projet collectif. Med Sci (Paris) 2012 ; 28 : 993–999. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Weinstein RS. Prospects for telepathology. Hum Pathol 1986 ; 17 : 433–444. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ameisen D, Le Naour G, Daniel C. Technologie des lames virtuelles : de la numérisation à la mise en ligne. Med Sci (Paris) 2012 ; 28 : 977–982. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Weinstein RS, Graham AR, Richter LC, et al. Overview of telepathology, virtual microscopy, and whole slide imaging : prospects for the future. Hum Pathol 2009 ; 40 : 1057–1069. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Al-Janabi S, Huisman A, Van Diest PJ. Digital pathology : current status and future perspectives. Histopathology 2011 ; 61 : 1–9. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Rodriguez-Urrego PA, Cronin AM, Al-Ahmadie HA, et al. Interobserver and intraobserver reproducibility in digital and routine microscopic assessment of prostate needle biopsies. Hum Pathol 2011 ; 42 : 68–74. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Risio M, Bussolati G, Senore C, et al. Virtual microscopy for histology quality assurance of screen-detected polyps. J Clin Pathol 2010 ; 63 : 916–920. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Vergier B, Guettier C. L’utilisation des lames virtuelles en pédagogie. Med Sci (Paris) 2012 ; 28 : 986–989. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Janin A, Legrès L, Lebœuf C, et al. Les lames virtuelles en recherche expérimentale et en recherche clinique. Med Sci (Paris) 2012 ; 28 : 990–992. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Têtu B, Fortin JP, Gagnon MP, Louahlia S. The challenges of implementing a patient-oriented telepathology network. The Eastern Québec telepathology project experience. Anal Cell Pathol (Amst) 2011 ; 9 septembre (online). [Google Scholar]
  12. Peces C, García-Rojo M, Sacristán J, et al. Serendipia : Castilla-La Mancha telepathology network. Diagn Pathol 2008 ; 3 : S5. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Daniel C, Rojo MG, Klossa J, et al. Standardizing the use of whole slide images in digital pathology. Comput Med Imaging Graph 2011 ; 35 : 496–505. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Rojo MG, Castro AM, Gonçalves L. COST Action EuroTelepath : digital pathology integration in electronic health record, including primary care centres. Diagn Pathol 2011 ; 6 : S6. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.