Free Access
Med Sci (Paris)
Volume 28, Mars 2012
Génomique et recherche clinique en oncologie : approches de sciences humaines, économiques et sociales (SHES)
Page(s) 33 - 36
Section M/S Revues
Published online 09 April 2012
  1. Partridge AH, Winer EP. Informing clinical trial participants about study results. JAMA 2002 ; 288 : 363–365. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Shalowitz D, Miller F. Communicating, the results of clinical research to participants: attitudes, practices, future directions. PLoS Med 2008 ; 5 : e91. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Partridge AH, Wong JS, Knudsen K, et al. Offering participants results of a clinical trial: sharing results of a negative study. Lancet 2005 ; 365 : 963–964. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Fernandez CV, Gao J, Strahlendorf C, et al. Providing research results to participants: attitudes and needs of adolescents and parents of children with cancer. J Clin Oncol 2009 ; 27 : 878–883. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Johnson L, Barret-Lee P, Ellis, P, Bliss JM. How do patients want to learn of results of clinical trials? A survey of 1431 breast cancer patients. Br J Cancer 2008 ; 98 : 34–38. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Sarradon-Eck A, Mancini J, Sakoyan J, et al. Restitution des résultats d’un essai clinique aux participantes : malentendus, significations multiples et attentes plurielles, Workshop CanBios Innovation en génomique et recherche clinique en cancérologie : enjeux de sciences humaines économiques et sociales. Marseille, 8 avril 2011. [Google Scholar]
  7. Dixon-Woods M, Ashcroft RE, Jackson CJ, et al. Beyond misunderstanding: written information and decisions about taking part in a genetic epidemiology study. Soc Sci Med 2007 ; 65 : 2212–2222. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Easter MM, Henderson GE, Davis AM, et al. The many meanings of care in clinical research. Soc Health Illn 2006 ; 28 : 695–712. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Timmermans S, McKay T. Clinical trials as treatment option: Bioethics and health care disparities in substance dependency. Soc Sci Med 2009 ; 69 : 1784–1790. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hallowell N, Cooke S, Crawford G, et al. Distinguishing research from clinical care in cancer genetics: theoretical justifications and practical strategies. Soc Sci Med 2009 ; 68 : 2010–2017. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Appelbaum PS, Roth LH, Lidz CW. The therapeutic misconception in clinical research: Informed consent in psychiatric research. Int J Law Psychiatry 1982 ; 5 : 319–329. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Lidz CW, Appelbaum PS, Grisso T, Renaud M. Therapeutic misconception and the appreciation of risks in clinical trials. Soc Sci Med 2004 ; 58 : 1689–1697. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Henderson GE, Easter MM, Zimmer C, et al. Therapeutic misconception in early phase gene transfer trials. Soc Sci Med 2006 ; 62 : 239–253. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Henderson GE, Churchill LR, Davis AM, et al. Clinical trials, medical care: defining the therapeutic misconception. PLoS Med 2007 ; 4 : e324. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Featherstone K, Donovan JL. Why don’t they just tell me straight, why allocate it’? The struggle to make sense of participating in a randomised controlled trial. Soc Sci Med 2002 ; 55 : 709–719. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Julian-Reynier C, Genève J, Dalenc F, et al. Assessment of care by breast cancer patients participating or not participating in a randomized controlled trial: a report with the patients’ committee for clinical trials of the Ligue nationale contre le cancer. J Clin Oncol 2007 ; 25 : 3038–3044. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Spielmann DI, Roche H, Delozier T, et al. Trastuzumab for patients with axillary-node-positive breast cancer: results of the FNCLCC-PACS04 trial. J Clin Oncol 2009 ; 36 : 6129–6134. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Piccart-Gebhart M, Procter M, Leyland-Jones B, et al. Trastuzumab after adjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-positive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2005 ; 353 : 1659–1672. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Romond EH, Perez EA, Bryant J, et al. Trastuzumab plus adjuvant chemotherapy for operable HER2-positive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2005 ; 353 : 1673–1684. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Löwy I. Cancer de chercheurs cancer de cliniciens. Trajectoire d’une innovation thérapeutique. Paris : Édition des Archives Contemporaines, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  21. Turner EH, Matthews AM, Linardatos E, et al. Selective publication of antidepressant trials and its influence on apparent efficacy. N Engl J Med 2008 ; 358 : 252–260. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Miller FG, Rosenstein DL, DeRenzo EG. Professional integrity in clinical research. JAMA 1998 ; 280 : 1449–1454. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. DelVecchio Good MJ, Good B, Schaffer C, Lind SE. American oncology and the discours on hope. Cult Med Psychiatry 1990 ; 14 : 59–79. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Fernandez CV, Kodish E, Shurin S, Weijer C. Offering to return results to research participants: attitudes and needs of principal investigators in the children’s oncology group. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2003 ; 25 : 704–708. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Wang L. Researchers push for sharing of trial results with participants. J Natl Cancer Inst 2002 ; 94 : 1049–1050. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Dixon-Woods M, Jackson C, Windrige KC, Kenyon S. Receiving a summary of the results of a trail: qualitative study of participants’ views. Br Med J 2006 ; 332 : 206–210. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Mancini J, Genre D, Dalenc F, et al. Participants’ uptake of trial results: a randomised experiment. Br J Cancer 2010 ; 102 : 1081–1084. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Dorsey ER, Beck CA, Adams M, et al. Communicating clinical trial results to research participants. Arch Neurol 2008 ; 65 : 1590–1595. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Partridge AH, Wolff AC, Marcom PK, et al. The impact of sharing results of a randomized breast cancer clinical trial with study participants. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2009 ; 115 : 123–129. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Avins AL, Bent S, Padula A, et al. Initial experience with a group presentation of study to research participants. Trials 2008 ; 9 : 16. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.