EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
Home All issues Volume 24 / No 10 (Octobre 2008) Med Sci (Paris), 24 10 (2008) 847-852 References
Free Access
Issue
Med Sci (Paris)
Volume 24, Number 10, Octobre 2008
Page(s) 847 - 852
Section M/S revues
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/medsci/20082410847
Published online 15 October 2008
  1. Cairns J. Mutation selection and the natural history of cancer. Nature 1975; 255 : 197–200. [Google Scholar]
  2. Kuroki T, Murakami Y. Random segregation of DNA strands in epidermal basal cells. Jpn J Cancer Res 1989; 80 : 637–42. [Google Scholar]
  3. Lansdorp PM. Immortal strands ? Give me a break. Cell 2007; 129 : 1244–7. [Google Scholar]
  4. Lark KG, Consigli RA, Minocha HC. Segregation of sister chromatids in mammalian cells. Science 1966; 154 : 1202–5. [Google Scholar]
  5. Potten CS, Hume WJ, Reid P, Cairns J. The segregation of DNA in epithelial stem cells. Cell 1978; 15 : 899–906. [Google Scholar]
  6. Potten CS, Owen G, Booth D. Intestinal stem cells protect their genome by selective segregation of template DNA strands. J Cell Sci 2002; 115 : 2381–8. [Google Scholar]
  7. Barker N, van Es JH, Kuipers J, et al. Identification of stem cells in small intestine and colon by marker gene lgr5. Nature 2007; 449 : 1003–7. [Google Scholar]
  8. Karpowicz P, Morshead C, Kam A, et al. Support for the immortal strand hypothesis: Neural stem cells partition DNA asymmetrically in vitro. J Cell Biol 2005; 170 : 721–32. [Google Scholar]
  9. Smith GH. Label-retaining epithelial cells in mouse mammary gland divide asymmetrically and retain their template DNA strands. Development 2005; 132 : 681–7. [Google Scholar]
  10. Conboy MJ, Karasov AO, Rando TA. High incidence of non-random template strand segregation and asymmetric fate determination in dividing stem cells and their progeny. PLoS Biol 2007; 5 : e102. [Google Scholar]
  11. Shinin V, Gayraud-Morel B, Gomes D, Tajbakhsh S. Asymmetric division and cosegregation of template DNA strands in adult muscle satellite cells. Nat Cell Biol 2006; 8 : 677–82. [Google Scholar]
  12. Lark KG. Nonrandom segregation of sister chromatids in vicia faba and triticum boeoticum. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1967; 58 : 352–9. [Google Scholar]
  13. Ito K, McGhee JD. Parental DNA strands segregate randomly during embryonic development of Caenorhabditis elegans. Cell 1987; 49 : 329–36. [Google Scholar]
  14. Kiel MJ, He S, Ashkenazi R, et al. Haematopoietic stem cells do not asymmetrically segregate chromosomes or retain brdu. Nature 2007; 449 : 238–42. [Google Scholar]
  15. Comings DE. The distribution of sister chromatids at mitosis in chinese hamster cells. Chromosoma 1970; 29 : 428–33. [Google Scholar]
  16. Fernandez-Gomez ME, de la Torre C, Stockert JC. Random segregation of sister chromatids in meristematic cells. Exp Cell Res 1975; 96 : 156–60. [Google Scholar]
  17. Morris VB. Random segregation of sister chromatids in developing chick retinal cells demonstrated in vivo using the fluorescence plus giemsa technique. Chromosoma 1977; 60 : 139–45. [Google Scholar]
  18. Klar AJ. Lessons learned from studies of fission yeast mating-type switching and silencing. Annu Rev Genet 2007; 41 : 213–36. [Google Scholar]
  19. Yamashita YM, Jones DL, Fuller MT. Orientation of asymmetric stem cell division by the apc tumor suppressor and centrosome. Science 2003; 301 : 1547–50. [Google Scholar]
  20. Armakolas A, Klar AJ. Cell type regulates selective segregation of mouse chromosome 7 DNA strands in mitosis. Science 2006; 311 : 1146–9. [Google Scholar]
  21. Armakolas A, Klar AJ. Left-right dynein motor implicated in selective chromatid segregation in mouse cells. Science 2007; 315 : 100–1. [Google Scholar]
  22. Holleran EA, Karki S, Holzbaur EL. The role of the dynactin complex in intracellular motility. Int Rev Cytol 1998; 182 : 69–109. [Google Scholar]
  23. Pfarr CM, Coue M, Grissom PM, et al. Cytoplasmic dynein is localized to kinetochores during mitosis. Nature 1990; 345 : 263–5. [Google Scholar]
  24. Starr DA, Williams BC, Hays TS, Goldberg ML. Zw10 helps recruit dynactin and dynein to the kinetochore. J Cell Biol 1998; 142 : 763–74. [Google Scholar]
  25. Steuer ER, Wordeman L, Schroer TA, Sheetz MP. Localization of cytoplasmic dynein to mitotic spindles and kinetochores. Nature 1990; 345 : 266–8. [Google Scholar]
  26. Vaisberg EA, Koonce MP, McIntosh JR. Cytoplasmic dynein plays a role in mammalian mitotic spindle formation. J Cell Biol 1993; 123 : 849–58. [Google Scholar]
  27. Jacobs CW, Adams AE, Szaniszlo PJ, Pringle JR. Functions of microtubules in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell cycle. J Cell Biol 1988; 107 : 1409–26. [Google Scholar]
  28. Saunders WS, Shuster M, Huang X, et al. Chromosomal instability and cytoskeletal defects in oral cancer cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000; 97 : 303–8. [Google Scholar]
  29. Ekwall K. Epigenetic control of centromere behavior. Annu Rev Genet 2007; 41 : 63–81. [Google Scholar]
  30. Volpe TA, Kidner C, Hall IM, et al. Regulation of heterochromatic silencing and histone h3 lysine-9 methylation by rnai. Science 2002; 297 : 1833–7. [Google Scholar]
  31. Provost P, Silverstein RA, Dishart D, et al. Dicer is required for chromosome segregation and gene silencing in fission yeast cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002; 99 : 16648–53. [Google Scholar]
  32. Volpe T, Schramke V, Hamilton GL, et al. RNA interference is required for normal centromere function in fission yeast. Chromosome Res 2003; 11 : 137–46. [Google Scholar]
  33. Fukagawa T. Assembly of kinetochores in vertebrate cells. Exp Cell Res 2004; 296 : 21–7. [Google Scholar]
  34. Kanellopoulou C, Muljo SA, Kung AL, et al. Dicer-deficient mouse embryonic stem cells are defective in differentiation and centromeric silencing. Genes Dev 2005; 19 : 489–501. [Google Scholar]
  35. Rambhatla L, Bohn SA, Stadler PB, et al. Cellular senescence: ex vivo p53-dependent asymmetric cell kinetics. J Biomed Biotechnol 2001; 1 : 28–37. [Google Scholar]
  36. Rosenberger RF, Kessel. Nonrandom sister chromatid segregation and nuclear migration in hyphae of Aspergillus nidulans. J Bacteriol 1968; 1 : 1208–13. [Google Scholar]
  37. Castro A, Vigneron S, Lorca T, Labbé JC. La mitose sous surveillance. Med Sci (Paris) 2003; 19 : 309–17. [Google Scholar]
  38. Labbé JP. Élasticité du centromère. Med Sci (Paris) 2005; 21 : 261–6. [Google Scholar]
  39. Ray-Gallet D, Gérard A, Polo S, Almouzni G. Variations sur le thème, du code histone. Med Sci (Paris) 2005; 21 : 384–9. [Google Scholar]
  40. Képès F. L’épigénétique comme aspect de la postgénomique. Med Sci (Paris) 2005; 21 : 371–6. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.