EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
Home All issues Volume 24 / No 8-9 (Août-Septembre 2008) Med Sci (Paris), 24 8-9 (2008) 771-775 References
Free Access
Issue
Med Sci (Paris)
Volume 24, Number 8-9, Août-Septembre 2008
Page(s) 771 - 775
Section Forum
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/medsci/20082489771
Published online 15 August 2008
  1. De la Vega J. La communication scientifique à l’épreuve de l’internet : l’émergence d’un nouveau modèle. Collection « Référence » Presses de l’ENSSIB, Villeurbanne. [Google Scholar]
  2. Kleiner K. Freedom fighter. NewScientist 2003 : 2419. [Google Scholar]
  3. Poynder R. Open and shut. Interview with Harold Varmus, juin 2006 : [Google Scholar]
  4. http://poynder.blogspot.com/2006/06/interview-with-harold-varmus.html. [Google Scholar]
  5. Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities, octobre 2003 : http://oa.mpg.de/openaccess-berlin/berlindeclaration.html. [Google Scholar]
  6. Protocole d’accord en vue d’une approche coordonnée, au niveau national, pour l’archivage ouvert de la production scientifique, juillet 2006 : http://www.archives-ouvertes.fr/spip.php ?article7. [Google Scholar]
  7. Baudoin L, Haeffner-Cavaillon N, Pinhas N, Mouchet S, et al. Indicateurs bibliométriques. Réalités, mythes et prospective. Med Sci (Paris) 2004; 20 : 909–15. [Google Scholar]
  8. Tite L, Schroter S. Why do peer reviewers decline to review ? A survey. J Epidemiol Community Health 2007; 61 : 9–12. [Google Scholar]
  9. Nature’s trial of open peer review, 2006 : http://www.nature.com/nature/peerreview/debate/index.html [Google Scholar]
  10. Warlick S, Vaughan K. Factors influencing publication choice : why faculty choose open access. Biomedical Digital Libraries 2007; 4: 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  11. Creaser C, Maynard S, White S. Featuring trend analysis of UK public and academic libraries 1995-2005. Lisu annual library statistics, 2006 :http://www.lboro.ac.uk/departments/ls/lisu/downloads/als06.pdf [Google Scholar]
  12. An Economic Analysis of Scientific Research Publishing. A report commissioned by the Wellcome Trust, 2003 : http://www.wellcome.ac.uk/About-us/Publications/Books/Biomedical-science/WTD003181.htm [Google Scholar]
  13. Van Orsdel LC, Born K. Periodicals Price Survey 2008: Embracing Openness. Library Journal, 2008 : http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6431958.html [Google Scholar]
  14. Study of the economic and technical evolution of the scientific publication markets in Europe. Report from the European Commission, janvier 2006 : http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/pdf/scientific-publication-study_en.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  15. Lalöe F. Attention, l’humanité perd la mémoire. Le Monde, 27 janvier 2008. [Google Scholar]
  16. Kotzin S. La sélection des périodiques pour Medline. World Library and Information Congress : 71st IFLA General Conference and Council, août 2005 : http://www.ifla.org/IV/ifla71/papers/174-Kotzin-trans-fr.pdf [Google Scholar]
  17. Suber P. Strong ans weak OA, 29 avril 2008 : http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/2008/04/strong-and-weak-oa.html [Google Scholar]
  18. The Impact of Open Access Journals. A Citation Study from Thomson ISI, 2004 : http://scientific.thomson.com/media/presentrep/acropdf/impact-oa-journals.pdf [Google Scholar]
  19. Baruch P. Open access developments in France : the HAL Open Archives System. Learned Publishing, 2007 : 20 : 267–82. [Google Scholar]
  20. Journal Publishing Tag Set Tag Library, mars 2007 : http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/tag-library/2.3/index.html [Google Scholar]
  21. Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing, juin 2003 : http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/bethesda.htm [Google Scholar]
  22. Bérard P. Le rôle des publications en mathématiques. Med Sci 2008. [Google Scholar]
  23. Huc C. la pérennisation des infomrations sous forme numérique : risque, enjeux, et élémetns de solution. Med Sci 2008; 24 : 653–7. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.