EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
Home All issues Volume 24 / No 6-7 (Juin-Juillet 2008) Med Sci (Paris), 24 6-7 (2008) 599-606 References
Free Access
Issue
Med Sci (Paris)
Volume 24, Number 6-7, Juin-Juillet 2008
Page(s) 599 - 606
Section M/S revues
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/medsci/20082467599
Published online 15 June 2008
  1. The Chipping Forecast. Nat Genet 1999; 21 (suppl) : 1–60. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bertucci F, Houlgatte R, Nguyen C, et al. Gene expression profiling of cancer by use of DNA arrays : how far from the clinic ? Lancet Oncol 2001; 2 : 674–82. [Google Scholar]
  3. Perou CM, Sorlie T, Eisen MB, et al. Molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature 2000; 406 : 747–52. [Google Scholar]
  4. Sorlie T, Perou CM, Tibshirani R, et al. Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001; 98 : 10869–74. [Google Scholar]
  5. Carey LA, Perou CM, Livasy CA, et al. Race, breast cancer subtypes, and survival in the Carolina breast cancer study. JAMA 2006; 295 : 2492–502. [Google Scholar]
  6. Sorlie T, Tibshirani R, Parker J, et al. Repeated observation of breast tumor subtypes in independent gene expression data sets. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003; 100 : 8418–23. [Google Scholar]
  7. Yu K, Lee CH, Tan PH, Tan P. Conservation of breast cancer molecular subtypes and transcriptional patterns of tumor progression across distinct ethnic populations. Clin Cancer Res 2004; 10 : 5508–17. [Google Scholar]
  8. Bertucci F, Finetti P, Rougemont J, et al. Gene expression profiling identifies molecular subtypes of inflammatory breast cancer. Cancer Res 2005; 65 : 2170–8. [Google Scholar]
  9. Rouzier R, Perou CM, Symmans WF, et al. Breast cancer molecular subtypes respond differently to preoperative chemotherapy. Clin Cancer Res 2005; 11 : 5678–85. [Google Scholar]
  10. van ’t Veer LJ, Dai H, van de Vijver MJ, et al. Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer. Nature 2002; 415 : 530–6. [Google Scholar]
  11. Wang Y, Klijn JG, Zhang Y, et al. Gene-expression profiles to predict distant metastasis of lymph-node-negative primary breast cancer. Lancet 2005; 365 : 671–9. [Google Scholar]
  12. van de Vijver MJ, He YD, van’t Veer LJ, et al. A gene-expression signature as a predictor of survival in breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2002; 347 : 1999–2009. [Google Scholar]
  13. Buyse M, Loi S, van’t Veer L, et al. Validation and clinical utility of a 70-gene prognostic signature for women with node-negative breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2006; 98 : 1183–92. [Google Scholar]
  14. Foekens JA, Atkins D, Zhang Y, et al. Multicenter validation of a gene expression-based prognostic signature in lymph node-negative primary breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24 : 1665–71. [Google Scholar]
  15. Desmedt C, Piette F, Loi S, et al. Strong time dependence of the 76-gene prognostic signature for node-negative breast cancer patients in the TRANSBIG multicenter independent validation series. Clin Cancer Res 2007; 13 : 3207–14. [Google Scholar]
  16. Piccart-Gebhart MJ. Moving away from the « one shoe fits all » strategy : the key to future progress in chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23 : 1611–3. [Google Scholar]
  17. Bertucci F, Houlgatte R, Benziane A, et al. Gene expression profiling of primary breast carcinomas using arrays of candidate genes. Hum Mol Genet 2000; 9 : 2981–91. [Google Scholar]
  18. Bertucci F, Nasser V, Granjeaud S, et al. Gene expression profiles of poor-prognosis primary breast cancer correlate with survival. Hum Mol Genet 2002; 11 : 863–72. [Google Scholar]
  19. Pawitan Y, Bjohle J, Amler L, et al. Gene expression profiling spares early breast cancer patients from adjuvant therapy : derived and validated in two population-based cohorts. Breast Cancer Res 2005; 7 : R953–64. [Google Scholar]
  20. Ma XJ, Wang Z, Ryan PD, et al. A two-gene expression ratio predicts clinical outcome in breast cancer patients treated with tamoxifen. Cancer Cell 2004; 5 : 607–16. [Google Scholar]
  21. Paik S, Shak S, Tang G, et al. A multigene assay to predict recurrence of tamoxifen-treated, node-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2004; 351 : 2817–26. [Google Scholar]
  22. Mamounas EP, Fisher B. Preoperative (neoadjuvant) chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer. Semin Oncol 2001; 28 : 389–99. [Google Scholar]
  23. Bertucci F, Finetti P, Rougemont J, et al. Gene expression profiling for molecular characterization of inflammatory breast cancer and prediction of response to chemotherapy. Cancer Res 2004; 64 : 8558–65. [Google Scholar]
  24. Folgueira MA, Carraro DM, Brentani H, et al. Gene expression profile associated with response to doxorubicin-based therapy in breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2005; 11 : 7434–43. [Google Scholar]
  25. Chang JC, Wooten EC, Tsimelzon A, et al. Gene expression profiling for the prediction of therapeutic response to docetaxel in patients with breast cancer. Lancet 2003; 362 : 362–9. [Google Scholar]
  26. Chang JC, Wooten EC, Tsimelzon A, et al. Patterns of resistance and incomplete response to docetaxel by gene expression profiling in breast cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23 : 1169–77. [Google Scholar]
  27. Iwao-Koizumi K, Matoba R, Ueno N, et al. Prediction of docetaxel response in human breast cancer by gene expression profiling. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23 : 422–31. [Google Scholar]
  28. Ayers M, Symmans WF, Stec J, et al. Gene expression profiles predict complete pathologic response to neoadjuvant paclitaxel and fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2004; 22 : 2284–93. [Google Scholar]
  29. Gianni L, Zambetti M, Clark K, et al. Gene expression profiles in paraffin-embedded core biopsy tissue predict response to chemotherapy in women with locally advanced breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23 : 7265–77. [Google Scholar]
  30. Hannemann J, Oosterkamp HM, Bosch CA, et al. Changes in gene expression associated with response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005; 23 : 3331–42. [Google Scholar]
  31. Hess KR, Anderson K, Symmans WF, et al. Pharmacogenomic predictor of sensitivity to preoperative chemotherapy with paclitaxel and fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24 : 4236–44. [Google Scholar]
  32. Ring A, Dowsett M. Mechanisms of tamoxifen resistance. Endocr Relat Cancer 2004; 11 : 643–58. [Google Scholar]
  33. Jansen MP, Foekens JA, van Staveren IL, et al. Molecular classification of tamoxifen-resistant breast carcinomas by gene expression profiling. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23 : 732–40. [Google Scholar]
  34. Chang HY, Sneddon JB, Alizadeh AA, et al. Gene expression signature of fibroblast serum response predicts human cancer progression : similarities between tumors and wounds. PLoS Biol 2004; 2 : E7. [Google Scholar]
  35. Chang HY, Nuyten DS, Sneddon JB, et al. Robustness, scalability, and integration of a wound-response gene expression signature in predicting breast cancer survival. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005; 102 : 3738–43. [Google Scholar]
  36. Chi JT, Wang Z, Nuyten DS, et al. Gene expression programs in response to hypoxia : cell type specificity and prognostic significance in human cancers. PLoS Med 2006; 3 : e47. [Google Scholar]
  37. Glinsky GV, Berezovska O, Glinskii AB. Microarray analysis identifies a death-from-cancer signature predicting therapy failure in patients with multiple types of cancer. J Clin Invest 2005; 115 : 1503–21. [Google Scholar]
  38. Liu R, Wang X, Chen GY, et al. The prognostic role of a gene signature from tumorigenic breast-cancer cells. N Engl J Med 2007; 356 : 217–26. [Google Scholar]
  39. Bild AH, Yao G, Chang JT, et al. Oncogenic pathway signatures in human cancers as a guide to targeted therapies. Nature 2006; 439 : 353–7. [Google Scholar]
  40. Sotiriou C, Wirapati P, Loi S, et al. Gene expression profiling in breast cancer : understanding the molecular basis of histologic grade to improve prognosis. J Natl Cancer Inst 2006; 98 : 262–72. [Google Scholar]
  41. Loi S, Haibe-Kains B, Desmedt C, et al. Definition of clinically distinct molecular subtypes in estrogen receptor-positive breast carcinomas through genomic grade. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25 : 1239–46. [Google Scholar]
  42. Ivshina AV, George J, Senko O, et al. Genetic reclassification of histologic grade delineates new clinical subtypes of breast cancer. Cancer Res 2006; 66 : 10292–301. [Google Scholar]
  43. Miller LD, Smeds J, George J, et al. An expression signature for p53 status in human breast cancer predicts mutation status, transcriptional effects, and patient survival. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005; 102 : 13550–5. [Google Scholar]
  44. Dupuy A, Simon RM. Critical review of published microarray studies for cancer outcome and guidelines on statistical analysis and reporting. J Natl Cancer Inst 2007; 99 : 147–57. [Google Scholar]
  45. Shi L, Reid LH, Jones WD, et al. The microarray quality control (MAQC) project shows inter- and intraplatform reproducibility of gene expression measurements. Nat Biotechnol 2006; 24 : 1151–61. [Google Scholar]
  46. Ein-Dor L, Kela I, Getz G, Givol D, Domany E. Outcome signature genes in breast cancer : is there a unique set ? Bioinformatics 2005; 21 : 171–8. [Google Scholar]
  47. Fan C, Oh DS, Wessels L, et al. Concordance among gene-expression-based predictors for breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2006; 355 : 560–9. [Google Scholar]
  48. Blay JY. Le futur des thérapeutiques ciblées en oncologie : trouver les cibles, traiter tôt et au long cours. Med Sci (Paris) 2007; 23 : 1073–4. [Google Scholar]
  49. Charafe-Jauffret E, Chaffanet M, Bertucci F, et al. Les cancers du sein : vers un modèle cellulaire et moléculaire intégré. Med Sci (Paris) 2007; 23 : 626–32. [Google Scholar]
  50. Jordan B. Chroniques génomiques : des puces ADN en clinique ? Med Sci (Paris) 2007; 23 : 210–4. [Google Scholar]
  51. Michiels S, Hill C. Défis statistiques posés par les biopuces : autant d’espoir que de faux positifs ? Med Sci (Paris) 2008; 24 : 317–9. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.