Free Access
Issue |
Med Sci (Paris)
Volume 23, Number 8-9, Août-Septembre 2007
|
|
---|---|---|
Page(s) | 729 - 734 | |
Section | M/S revues | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/medsci/20072389729 | |
Published online | 15 August 2007 |
- Tautz D. Hypervariability of simple sequences as a general source for polymorphic DNA markers. Nucleic Acids Res 1989; 17 : 6463–71. [Google Scholar]
- Lagercrantz U, Ellegren H, Andersson L. The abundance of various polymorphic microsatellite motifs differs between plants and vertebrates. Nucleic Acids Res 1993; 21 : 1111–5. [Google Scholar]
- ISHGC, Lander ES, Linton LM, et al. Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature 2001; 409 : 860–921. [Google Scholar]
- Mouse Genome Sequencing Consortium. Initial sequencing and comparative analysis of the mouse genome. Nature 2002; 420 : 520–62. [Google Scholar]
- Primmer CR, Raudsepp T, Chowdhary BP, et al. Low frequency of microsatellites in the avian genome. Genome Res 1997; 7 : 471–82. [Google Scholar]
- Weber JL. Informativeness of human (Dc-Da)N.(Dg-Dt)N polymorphisms. Genomics 1990; 7 : 524–30. [Google Scholar]
- Rose O, Falush D. A threshold size for microsatellite expansion. Mol Biol Evol 1998; 15 : 613–5. [Google Scholar]
- Messier W, Li SH, Stewart CB. The birth of microsatellites. Nature 1996; 381 : 483-. [Google Scholar]
- Zhu Y, Strassmann JE, Queller DC. Insertions, substitutions, and the origin of microsatellites. Genet Res 2000; 76 : 227–36. [Google Scholar]
- Kazazian HH. Mobile elements : drivers of genome evolution. Science 2004; 303 : 1626–32. [Google Scholar]
- Wilder J, Hollocher H. Mobile elements and the genesis of microsatellites in dipterans. Mol Biol Evol 2001; 18 : 384–92. [Google Scholar]
- Nadir E, Margalit H, Gallily T, Ben-Sasson SA. Microsatellite spreading in the human genome : evolutionary mechanisms and structural implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996; 93 : 6470–5. [Google Scholar]
- Balaresque P, Toupance B, Heyer E, Crouau-Roy B. Evolutionary dynamics of duplicated microsatellites shared by sex chromosomes. J Mol Evol 2003; 57 : S128-S37. [Google Scholar]
- Buschiazzo E, Gemmell NJ. The rise, fall and renaissance of microsatellites in eukaryotic genomes. Bioessays 2006; 28 : 1040–50. [Google Scholar]
- Klintschar M, Dauber EM, Ricci U, et al. Haplotype studies support slippage as the mechanism of germline mutations in short tandem repeats. Electrophoresis 2004; 25 : 3344–8. [Google Scholar]
- Levinson G, Gutman GA. Slipped-strand mispairing : a major mechanism for DNA sequence evolution. Mol Biol Evol 1987; 4 : 203–21. [Google Scholar]
- Estoup A, Cornuet JM. Microsatellite evolution : inferences from population data. In : Goldstein DB, Schlotterer C, eds. Microsatellites : evolution and applications. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 1999 : 330. [Google Scholar]
- Sia EA, Jinks-Robertson S, Petes TD. Genetic control of microsatellite stability. Mutat Res 1997; 383 : 61–70. [Google Scholar]
- Tautz D, Schlotterer C. Simple sequences. Curr Opin Genet Dev 1994; 4 : 832–7. [Google Scholar]
- Shibata D. Microsatellite analysis of human tumours. In : Goldstein DB, Schlotterer C, eds. Microsatellites : evolution and applications. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 1999: 330. [Google Scholar]
- Schlotterer C. The evolution of molecular markers : just a matter of fashion ? Nat Rev Genet 2004; 5 : 63–9. [Google Scholar]
- Goldstein DB, Pollock DD. Launching microsatellites : a review of mutation processes and methods of phylogenetic inference. J Heredity 1997; 88 : 335–42. [Google Scholar]
- Kruglyak S, Durrett RT, Schug MD, Aquadro CF. Equilibrium distributions of microsatellite repeat length resulting from a balance between slippage events and point mutations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998; 95, 10774–8. [Google Scholar]
- Amos W. A comparative approach to the study of microsatellite evolution. In : Goldstein DB, Schlotterer C, eds. Microsatellites : evolution and applications. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 1999 : 330. [Google Scholar]
- Angers B, Bernatchez L. Complex evolution of a salmonid microsatellite locus and its consequences in inferring allelic divergence from size information. Mol Biol Evol 1997; 14 : 230–8. [Google Scholar]
- Taylor JS, Durkin JM, Breden F. The death of a microsatellite : a phylogenetic perspective on microsatellite interruptions. Mol Biol Evol 1999; 16 : 567–72. [Google Scholar]
- Schlotterer C. Evolutionary dynamics of microsatellite DNA. Chromosoma 2000; 109 : 365–71. [Google Scholar]
- Balaresque P, Toupance B, Lluis QM, et al. Sex-specific selection on the human X chromosome ? Genet Res 2004; 83 : 169–76. [Google Scholar]
- Schlotterer C, Amos B, Tautz D. Conservation of polymorphic simple sequence loci in cetacean species. Nature 1991; 354 : 63–5. [Google Scholar]
- Rico C, Rico I, Hewitt G. 470 million years of conservation of microsatellite loci among fish species. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1996; 263 : 549–57. [Google Scholar]
- Blanquer-Maumont A, Crouau-Roy B. Polymorphism, monomorphism, and sequences in conserved microsatellites in primate species. J Mol Evol 1995; 41 : 492–7. [Google Scholar]
- Metzgar D, Bytof J, Wills C. Selection against frameshift mutations limits microsatellite expansion in coding DNA. Genome Res 2000; 10 : 72–80. [Google Scholar]
- Ruggiero T, Olivero M, Follenzi A, et al. Deletion in a (T)(8) microsatellite abrogates expression regulation by 3’-UTR. Nucleic Acids Res 2003; 31 : 6561–9. [Google Scholar]
- Li YC, Korol AB, Fahima T, et al. Microsatellites : genomic distribution, putative functions and mutational mechanisms. Mol Ecol 2002; 11 : 2453–65. [Google Scholar]
- Brohede J, Ellegren H. Microsatellite evolution : polarity of substitutions within repeats and neutrality of flanking sequences. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1999; 266 : 825–33. [Google Scholar]
- Vowles EJ, Amos W. Evidence for widespread convergent evolution around human microsatellites. Plos Biol 2004; 2 : 1157–67. [Google Scholar]
- Mountain JL, Knight A, Jobin M, et al. SNPSTRs : empirically derived, rapidly typed, autosomal haplotypes for inference of population history and mutational processes. Genome Res 2002; 12 : 1766–72. [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.