Free Access
Issue
Med Sci (Paris)
Volume 23, Number 6-7, Juin-Juillet 2007
Page(s) 640 - 643
Section Repères
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/medsci/20072367640
Published online 15 June 2007
  1. Flahault A, Costagliola D. Le dépistage du cancer du poumon par le scanner hélicoïdal est-il justifié ? Med Sci (Paris) 2007; 23 : 333–4. [Google Scholar]
  2. Wilson JMG, Jungner F. Principles and practice of screening for disease. WHO Public Health papers, n° 34. Genève : OMS, 1968. [Google Scholar]
  3. Whitby LG. Screening for disease : definitions and criteria. Lancet 1974; 2 : 819–22. [Google Scholar]
  4. Voir notamment les travaux du Groupe canadien sur les soins de santé préventifs (http://www.ctfphc.org/French_Text/French_pubs.htm). [Google Scholar]
  5. Black WC. Overdiagnosis : an underecognized cause of confusion and harm in cancer screening. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000; 92 : 1280–2. [Google Scholar]
  6. Welch HG, Schwartz LM, Woloshin S. Are increasing 5-years survival rates evidence of success against cancer ? JAMA 2000; 283 : 2975–8. [Google Scholar]
  7. Welch HG. Dois-je me faire tester pour le cancer ? Traduction de Fernand Turcotte. Québec : Les Presses de l’Université Laval, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  8. Bach PB, Jett JR, Pastorini U, et al. Computed tomography screening and lung cancer outcomes. JAMA 2007; 297 : 953-61 (voir aussi dans le même numéro l’éditorial : CT screening for lung cancer : spiralling into confusion : 995–7). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.