EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
Home All issues Volume 21 / No 4 (Avril 2005) Med Sci (Paris), 21 4 (2005) 371-376 References
Free Access
Issue
Med Sci (Paris)
Volume 21, Number 4, Avril 2005
Page(s) 371 - 376
Section M/S revues
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/medsci/2005214371
Published online 15 April 2005
  1. Morange M. The relations between genetics and epigenetics : a historical point of view. Ann NY Acad Sci 2002; 981 : 50–60. [Google Scholar]
  2. Wilson VL, Jones PA. DNA methylation decreases in aging but not in immortal cells. Science 1983; 220 : 1055–7. [Google Scholar]
  3. Issa JP. CpG-island methylation in aging and cancer. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 2000; 249 : 101–18. [Google Scholar]
  4. Tamaru H, Selker EU. A histone H3 methyltransferase controls DNA methylation in Neurospora crassa. Nature 2001; 414 : 277–83. [Google Scholar]
  5. Jackson JP, Lindroth AM, Cao X, Jacobsen SE. Control of CpNpG methylation by the KRYPTONITE histone H3 methyltransferase. Nature 2002; 416 : 556–60. [Google Scholar]
  6. Lehnertz B, Ueda Y, Derijck AA, et al. Suv39h-mediated histone H3 lysine 9 methylation directs DNA methylation to major satellite repeats at pericentric heterochromatin. Curr Biol 2003; 13 : 1192–200. [Google Scholar]
  7. Johnson L, Cao X, Jacobsen S. Interplay between two epigenetic marks. DNA methylation and histone H3 lysine 9 methylation. Curr Biol 2002; 12 : 1360–7. [Google Scholar]
  8. Soppe WJ, Jasencakova Z, Houben A, et al. DNA methylation controls histone H3 lysine 9 methylation and heterochromatin assembly in Arabidopsis. EMBO J 2002; 21 : 6549–59. [Google Scholar]
  9. Volpe TA, Kidner C, Hall IM, et al. Regulation of heterochromatic silencing and histone H3 lysine-9 methylation by RNAi. Science 2002; 297 : 1833–7. [Google Scholar]
  10. Zilberman D, Cao X, Jacobsen SE. ARGONAUTE4 control of locus-specific siRNA accumulation and DNA and histone methylation. Science 2003; 299 : 716–9. [Google Scholar]
  11. Baylin SB, Esteller M, Rountree MR, et al. Aberrant patterns of DNA methylation, chromatin formation and gene expression in cancer. Hum Mol Genet 2001; 10 : 687–92. [Google Scholar]
  12. Minsky A, Shimoni E, Frenkiel-Krispin D. Stress, order and survival. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2002; 3 : 50–60. [Google Scholar]
  13. Levin-Zaidman S, Englander J, Shimoni E, et al. Ringlike structure of the Deinococcus radiodurans genome : a key to radioresistance ? Science 2003; 299 : 254–6. [Google Scholar]
  14. Gerlich D, Beaudouin J, Kalbfuss B, et al. Global chromosome positions are transmitted through mitosis in mammalian cells. Cell 2003; 112 : 751–64. [Google Scholar]
  15. Lewis PJ, Thaker SD, Errington, J. Compartmentalization of transcription and translation in Bacillus subtilis. EMBO J 2000; 19 : 710–8. [Google Scholar]
  16. Cook PR. Predicting three-dimensional genome structure from transcriptional activity. Nat Genet 2002; 32 : 347–52. [Google Scholar]
  17. Képès F. Periodic epi-organization of the yeast genome revealed by the distribution of promoter sites. J Mol Biol 2003; 329 : 859–65. [Google Scholar]
  18. Képès F. Periodic transcriptional organization of the E. coli genome. J Mol Biol 2004; 340 : 957–64. [Google Scholar]
  19. Képès F, Vaillant C. Transcription-based solenoidal model of chromosomes. ComPlexUs 2003; 1 : 171–80. [Google Scholar]
  20. Müller-Hill B. The function of auxiliary operators. Mol Microbiol 1998; 29 : 13–8. [Google Scholar]
  21. Vilar JM, Leibler S. DNA looping and physical constraints on transcription regulation. J Mol Biol 2003; 331 : 981–9. [Google Scholar]
  22. Thomas R, D’Ari R. Biological feedback. Boca Raton, FL : CRC Press, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  23. Novick A, Wiener M. Enzyme induction is an all-or-none phenomenon. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1957; 43 : 553–6. [Google Scholar]
  24. Cohn M, Horibata K. Analysis of the differentiation and of the heterogeneity within a population of Escherichia coli undergoing induced béta-galactosidase synthesis. J Bacteriol 1959; 78 : 613–23. [Google Scholar]
  25. Elowitz MB, Leibler S. A synthetic oscillatory network of transcriptional regulators. Nature 2000; 403 : 335–8. [Google Scholar]
  26. Guespin-Michel J, Kaufman M. Positive feedback circuits and adaptive regulations in bacteria. Acta Biotheor 2001; 49 : 207–18. [Google Scholar]
  27. Bernot G, Comet JP, Richard A, Guespin J. Application of formal methods to biological regulatory networks : extending Thomas’ asynchronous logical approach with temporal logic. J Theor Biol 2004; 229 : 339–47. [Google Scholar]
  28. Guespin-Michel J, Bernot G, Comet JP, et al. Epigenesis and dynamic similarity in two regulatory networks in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Acta Biotheor 2004; 52 : 379–90. [Google Scholar]
  29. Atlan H. La fin du « tout génétique » ? Versailles : Éditions INRA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  30. Képès F. Le rêve du génomicien. Geninfo 1999; 2 : 3. [Google Scholar]
  31. Dardel F, Képès F. Bioinformatique : génomique et post-génomique. Palaiseau : Presses de l’École Polytechnique, 2000, 2002 (2e ed) : 235. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.