Free Access
Med Sci (Paris)
Volume 19, Number 10, Octobre 2003
Page(s) 994 - 998
Section M/S Revues
Published online 15 October 2003
  1. Jorgensen HS, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS. Recovery of walking function in stroke patients. The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1995; 76 : 27–32. [Google Scholar]
  2. Desrosiers J, Noreau L, Rochette A, Bravo G, Boutin C. Predictors of handicap situations following post-stroke rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil 2002; 24 : 774–85. [Google Scholar]
  3. Malouin F, Potvin M, Prevost J, Richards CL, Wood-Dauphinee S. Use of an intensive task-oriented gait training program in a series of patients with acute cerebrovascular accidents. Phys Ther 1992; 72 : 781–9. [Google Scholar]
  4. Richards CL, Malouin F, Wood-Dauphinee S, Williams JI, Bouchard JP, Brunet D. Task-specific physical therapy for optimization of gait recovery in acute stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993; 74 : 612–20. [Google Scholar]
  5. Visintin M, Barbeau H, Korner-Bitensky N. A new approach to retrain gait in stroke patients through body weight support and treadmill stimulation. Stroke 1998; 29 : 1122–8. [Google Scholar]
  6. Dean CM, Richards CL Malouin F. Task-related circuit training improves performance of locomotor tasks in chronic stroke. A randomized controlled pilot trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000; 81 : 409–17. 998 M/S n° 10, vol. 19, octobre 2003 [Google Scholar]
  7. Richards CL, Malouin F, Dean C. Gait in stroke: assessment and rehabilitation. In: Duncan P, ed. Clinics in geriatric medicine. Philadelphie: W.B. Saunders, 1999 : 15 : 833–55. [Google Scholar]
  8. Carr JH, Shepherd RB. Neurological rehabilitation. Optimizing motor performance. Oxford : Butterworth Heinemann, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  9. Dean C, Richards CL, Malouin F. Walking speed over 10 meters overestimates locomotor capacity after stroke. Clin Rehabil 2001; 15 : 415–21. [Google Scholar]
  10. Smith GV, Silver KH, Goldberg AP, Macko RF. «Task-oriented» exercise improves hamstring strength and spastic reflexes in chronic stroke patients. Stroke 1999; 30 : 212–9. [Google Scholar]
  11. Macko RF, Smith GV, Dobrovolny CL, Sorkin JD, Goldberg AP, Silver KH. Treadmill training improves fitness reserve in chronic stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001; 82 : 879–84. [Google Scholar]
  12. Nudo RJ, Pautz EJ, Frost SB. Role of adaptive plasticity in recovery of function after damage to motor cortex. Muscle Nerve 2001; 24 : 1000–19. [Google Scholar]
  13. Pascual-Leone A, Nguyet D, Cohen LG, Brasil-Neto JP, Cammarota A, Hallett M. Modulation of muscle responses evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation during the acquisition of new fine motor skills. J Neurophysiol 1995; 74 : 1037–45. [Google Scholar]
  14. Jackson PL, Lafleur M, Malouin F, Richards CL, Doyon J. Potential role of mental practice using motor imagery in neurologic rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001; 82 : 1133–41. [Google Scholar]
  15. Jeannerod, M. The representing brain: Neural correlates of motor intention and imagery. Behav Brain Sci 1994; 17 : 187–245. [Google Scholar]
  16. Jackson PL, Lafleur MF, Malouin F, Richards CL, Doyon J. Functional cerebral reorganization following motor sequence learning through mental practice with motor imagery. NeuroImage 2003 (sous presse). [Google Scholar]
  17. Sirigu A, Duhamel JR, Cohen L, Pillon B, Dubois B, Agid Y. The mental representation of hand movements after parietal cortex damage. Science 1996; 273 : 1564–8. [Google Scholar]
  18. Malouin F, Desrosiers J, Doyon J, Richards CL. Motor imagery ability after stroke. Soc Neurosci 2001; 27 : 950.4 (abstract). [Google Scholar]
  19. Page SJ, Levine P, Sisto SA, Johnston MV. Mental practice combined with physical practice for upperlimb motor deficit in subacute stroke. Phys Ther 2001; 81 : 1455–62. [Google Scholar]
  20. Malouin F, Belleville S, Descrosiers J, Doyon J, Richards CL. Working memory and mental practice after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003 (sous presse). [Google Scholar]
  21. Malouin F, Richards CL, Jackson PL, Dumas F, Doyon J. Brain activations during motor imagery of locomotor-related tasks: a PET study. Hum Brain Mapp 2003; 19 : 47–62. [Google Scholar]
  22. Gérin-Lajoie M, Richards CL, McFadyen BJ. Walking around upright obstacles: Effects of obstacle mobility and division of attention on anticipatory locomotor strategies. Soc Neurosci 2001; 27 : 406.124 (abstract). [Google Scholar]
  23. McComas J, Pivik J. Laflamme M. Current uses of virtual reality for children with disabilities. Stud Health Technol Inform 1998; 58 :161–9. [Google Scholar]
  24. Holden M, Dyar T, Callahan J, Schwamm L, Bizzi E. Quantitative assessment of motor generalization in the real world following training in virtual environment. Neurol Rep 2001; 25 : 130–1. [Google Scholar]
  25. DeRugy A, Montagne G, Buekers MJ, Laurent M. The study of locomotor pointing in virtual reality: The validation of a test set-up. Behav Res Meth Instr Comput 2000; 32 : 515–20. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.