EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
Home All issues Volume 19 / No 2 (Février 2003) Med Sci (Paris), 19 2 (2003) 231-238 References
Free Access
Issue
Med Sci (Paris)
Volume 19, Number 2, Février 2003
Page(s) 231 - 238
Section M/S Revues : Dossier Technique
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/medsci/2003192231
Published online 15 February 2003
  1. Kanis JA, Glüer CC, for the Committee of Scientific Advisors, International Osteoporosis Foundation. An update on the diagnosis and assessment of osteoporosis with densitometry. Osteoporosis Int 2000; 11: 192–202. [Google Scholar]
  2. Grampp S, Lang PV, Jergas M, et al. Assessment of the skeletal status by peripheral quantitative computed tomography of the forearm: short term precision in vivo and comparison to dual Xray absorptiometry. J Bone Miner Res 1995; 10: 1566–76. [Google Scholar]
  3. Glüer CC, Wu CY, Jergas M, Goldstein SA, Genant HK. Three quantitative ultrasound parameters reflect bone structure. Calcif Tissue Int 1994; 55: 46–52. [Google Scholar]
  4. Chappard C, Laugier P, Fournier B, Roux C, Berger G. Assessment of the relationship between broadband ultrasound attenuation and bone mineral density at the calcaneum using BUA imaging and DXA. Osteoporosis Int 1997; 7: 316–22. [Google Scholar]
  5. Roux C, Fournier B, Laugier P, et al. Broadband ultrasound attenuation imaging: a new imaging method in osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 1996; 11: 1112–8. [Google Scholar]
  6. Lewis MK, Black GM, Fogelman I. Patient dose in dual X-ray absorptiometry. Osteoporosis Int 1994; 4:11–5. [Google Scholar]
  7. Ho CHP, Kim RW, Schaffler MB, Sartoris DJ. Accuracy of dual-energy radiographic absorptiometry of the lumbar spine: a cadaver study. Radiology 1990; 176: 171–3. [Google Scholar]
  8. Ravaud P, Reny JL, Giraudeau B, Porcher R, Dougados M, Roux C. Smallest detectable difference in individual bone mineral density measurements. J Bone Miner Res 1999; 14: 1449–56. [Google Scholar]
  9. World Health Organization (WHO). Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for post menopausal osteoporosis: Report of a WHO study group. WHO Technical Report Series n° 843. Genève : OMS, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  10. Ahmed AIH, Black GM, Rymer JM, Fogelman I. Screening for osteopenia and osteoporosis: do the accepted normal ranges lead to over diagnosis? Osteoporosis Int 1997; 7: 432–8. [Google Scholar]
  11. Looker AC, Orwoll ES, Johnston CC, et al. Prevalence of low femoral bone density in older US adults from NHANES III. J Bone Miner Res 1997; 1761–8. [Google Scholar]
  12. Chen Z, Maricic M, Lund P, Tesser J, Gluck O. How the new Hologic hip normal reference values affect the densitometric diagnosis of osteoporosis. Osteoporosis Int 1998; 8: 423–7. [Google Scholar]
  13. Faulkner KG, Von Stetten E, Miller P. Discordance in patient classification using T-scores. J Clin Densit 1999 : 3 : 343–50. [Google Scholar]
  14. Greenspan SL, Maitland- Ramsey L, Myers E. Classification of osteoporosis in the elderly is dependent on sitespecific analysis. Calcif Tissue Int 1996; 58: 409–14. [Google Scholar]
  15. Lu Y, Genant HK, Shepherd J, et al. Classification of osteoporosis based on bone mineral densities. J Bone Miner Res 2001; 16: 901–10. [Google Scholar]
  16. Kanis JA, Johnell O, Oden A, Dawson A, De Laet C, Jonsson B. Ten year probabilities of osteoporotic fractures according to BMD and diagnostic thresholds. Osteoporosis Int 2001; 12: 989–95. [Google Scholar]
  17. Moro M, Hecker AT, Bouxsein ML, Myers ER. Failure load of thoracic vertebrae correlates with lumbar bone mineral density measured by DXA. Calcif Tissue Int 1995; 56: 206–9. [Google Scholar]
  18. Majumdar S, Genant HK. A review of the recent advances in magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of osteoporosis. Osteoporosis Int 1995; 5: 79–92. [Google Scholar]
  19. Cummings SR, Black DM, Nevitt MC, Browner WS, Cauley JA, Ensrud K, and the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. Bone density at various sites for prediction of hip fractures. Lancet 1993; 341: 72–5. [Google Scholar]
  20. Nevitt MC, Johnell O, Black DM, Ensrud K, Genant HK, Cummings SR, for the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. Bone mineral density predicts non-spine fractures in very elderly women. Osteoporosis Int 1994; 4: 325–31. [Google Scholar]
  21. Kröger H, Huopio J, Honkanen R, et al. Prediction of fracture risk using axial bone mineral density in a perimenopausal population: a prospective study. J Bone Miner Res 1995; 10: 302–6. [Google Scholar]
  22. Torgerson DJ, Campbell MK, Thomas RE, Reid DM. Prediction of perimenopausal fractures by bone mineral density and other risk factors. J Bone Miner Res 1996; 11: 293–7. [Google Scholar]
  23. Marshall D, Johnell O, Wedel H. Meta-analysis of how well measures of bone mineral density predict occurrence of occurrence of osteoporotic fractures. Br Med J 1996; 312: 1254–9. [Google Scholar]
  24. Black DM, Cummings SR, Melton LJ III. Appendicular bone mineral and a woman’s lifetime risk of hip fracture. J Bone Miner Res 1992; 7: 639–45. [Google Scholar]
  25. Hans D, Dargent-Molina P, Schott AM, et al. Ultrasonographic heel measurements to predict hip fracture in elderly women: the EPIDOS prospective study. Lancet 1996; 348: 511–4. [Google Scholar]
  26. Ayers M, Prince M, Ahmadi S, Baran DT. Reconciling quantitative ultrasound of the calcaneus with X-ray based measurements of the central skeleton. J Bone Miner Res 2000; 15: 1850–5. [Google Scholar]
  27. Cummings SR, Nevitt MC, Browner WS, et al. for the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Reseach Group. Risk factors for hip fracture in white women. N Engl J Med 1995; 332: 767–73. [Google Scholar]
  28. Cummings SR, Black DM, Thompson DE, et al. Effect of alendronate on risk of fracture in women with low bone density but without vertebral fractures. JAMA 1998; 280: 2077–82. [Google Scholar]
  29. Sarkar S, Mitlak BH, Wong M, Stock JL, Black DM, Harper KD. Relationships between bone mineral density and incident vertebral fracture risk with raloxifene therapy. J Bone Miner Res 2002; 17 : 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  30. Li Z, Meredith MP, Hoseyni MS. A method to assess the proportion of treatment effect explained by a surrogate end point. Stat Med 2001; 20: 3175–88. [Google Scholar]
  31. Cummings SR, Palermo L, Browner W, et al. Monitoring osteoporosis therapy with bone densitometry: misleading changes and regression to the mean. JAMA 2000; 283: 1318–21. [Google Scholar]
  32. Muller R, Hildebrand T, Hauselman HJ, Ruegsegger P. In vivo reproducibility of threedimensional structural properties of non invasive bone biopsies using 3DpQCT. J Bone Miner Res 1996; 11: 1745–50. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.