EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Rechercher
Menu
Accueil Tous les numéros Volume 42 / Numéro 6-7 (Juin-Juillet 2026) Med Sci (Paris), 42 6-7 (2026) 621-629 References
Open Access
Issue
Med Sci (Paris)
Volume 42, Number 6-7, Juin-Juillet 2026
Page(s) 621 - 629
Section Repères
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/medsci/2026105
Published online 17 juillet 2026
  1. Edman P, Begg G. A protein sequenator. In : Liébecq C, ed. European Journal of Biochemistry. Berlin, Heidelberg : Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1967 : 80–91. [Google Scholar]
  2. Edman P. A method for the determination of amino acid sequence in peptides. Arch Biochem 1949 ; 22 : 475. [Google Scholar]
  3. Dayhoff MO, Ledley RS. COMPROTEIN, a computer program to aid primary protein structure determination. AFIPS (Fall)1, 1962 : 262. [Google Scholar]
  4. Goodman M, Moore GW. Phylogeny of hemoglobin. Syst Zool 1973 ; 22: 508. [Google Scholar]
  5. Gauthier J, Vincent AT, Charette SJ, et al. A brief history of bioinformatics. Brief Bioinform 2019 ; 20 : 1981–96. [Google Scholar]
  6. Needleman SB, Wunsch CD. A general method applicable to the search for similarities in the amino acid sequence of two proteins. J Mol Bio 1970 ; 48 : 443–53. [Google Scholar]
  7. Higgins DG, Sharp PM. CLUSTAL: a package for performing multiple sequence alignment on a microcomputer. Gene 1988 ; 73 : 237–44. [Google Scholar]
  8. O’Farrell PH. High resolution two-dimensional electrophoresis of proteins. J Biol Chem 1975 ; 250 : 4007–21. [Google Scholar]
  9. Watson JD, Crick FHC. Molecular structure of nucleic acids: a structure for deoxyribose nucleic acid. Nature 1953 ; 171 : 737–8. [Google Scholar]
  10. Kahn A. L’hélice de la vie. Med Sci (Paris) 2003 ; 19 : 491–5. [Google Scholar]
  11. Crick FHC. The origin of the genetic code. J Mol Biol 1968 ; 38 : 367–9. [Google Scholar]
  12. Sanger F, Nicklen S, Coulson AR. DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U.S.A. 1977 ; 74 : 5463–7. [Google Scholar]
  13. Sanger F, Air GM, Barrell BG, et al. Nucleotide sequence of bacteriophage φX174 DNA. Nature 1977 ; 265 : 687–95. [Google Scholar]
  14. Christiansen T, Wall L, Orwant J. Programming Perl: Unmatched power for text processing and scripting. O’Reilly Media Inc, 4th edition. 2012 ; 1184 p. [Google Scholar]
  15. Kernighan BW, Ritchie DM. The C programming language. 28. print. Englewood Cliffs, NJ : Prentice-Hall, 1991 : 228 p. [Google Scholar]
  16. Stoesser G, Sterk P, Tuli MA, et al. The EMBL Nucleotide Sequence Database. Nucleic Acids Res 1997 ; 25 : 7–13. [Google Scholar]
  17. Bairoch A, Apweiler R. The SWISS-PROT protein sequence data bank and its supplement TrEMBL. Nucleic Acids Res 1997 ; 25 : 31–6. [Google Scholar]
  18. Camacho C, Coulouris G, Avagyan V, et al. BLAST+: architecture and applications. BMC Bioinformatics 2009 ; 10 : 421. [Google Scholar]
  19. Benson DA, Boguski MS, Lipman DJ, et al. GenBank. Nucleic Acids Res 1997 ; 25 : 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  20. Karsch-Mizrachi I, Takagi T, Cochrane G, et al. The international nucleotide sequence database collaboration. Nucleic Acids Res 2018 ; 46 : D48–51. [Google Scholar]
  21. Margulies M, Egholm M, Altman WE, et al. Genome sequencing in microfabricated high-density picolitre reactors. Nature 2005 ; 437 : 376–80. [Google Scholar]
  22. Goodwin S, McPherson JD, McCombie WR. Coming of age: ten years of next-generation sequencing technologies. Nat Rev Genet 2016 ; 17 : 333–51. [Google Scholar]
  23. Reuter JA, Spacek DV, Snyder MP. High-throughput sequencing technologies. Mol Cell 2015 ; 58 : 586–97. [Google Scholar]
  24. Montel F. Séquençage de l’ADN par nanopores: Résultats et perspectives. Med Sci (Paris) 2018 ; 34 : 161–5. [Google Scholar]
  25. Whitehouse CM, Dreyer RN, Yamashita M, et al. Electrospray interface for liquid chromatographs and mass spectrometers. Anal Chem 1985 ; 57 : 675–9. [Google Scholar]
  26. Aebersold R, Mann M. Mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nature 2003 ; 422: 198–207. [Google Scholar]
  27. Leinonen R, Sugawara H, Shumway M, et al. The sequence read archive. Nucleic Acids Res 2011 ; 39 : D19–21. [Google Scholar]
  28. Leinonen R, Akhtar R, Birney E, et al. The european nucleotide archive. Nucleic Acids Res 2011 ; 39 : D28–31. [Google Scholar]
  29. Wilkinson MD, Dumontier M, Aalbersberg IjJ, et al. The FAIR guiding principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci Data 2016 ; 3 : 160018. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Di Tommaso P, Chatzou M, Floden EW, et al. Nextflow enables reproducible computational workflows. Nat Biotechnol 2017 ; 35 : 316–9. [Google Scholar]
  31. Mölder F, Jablonski KP, Letcher B, et al. Sustainable data analysis with Snakemake. F1000Res 2021 ; 10 : 33. [Google Scholar]
  32. Merkel D. Docker: lightweight Linux containers for consistent development and deployment. Linux J 2014 ; 2. [Google Scholar]
  33. Kurtzer GM, Sochat V, Bauer MW. Singularity: scientific containers for mobility of compute. PLoS ONE 2017 ; 12: e0177459. [Google Scholar]
  34. Taly A, Verger A. Prédiction de structures biomoléculaires complexes par AlphaFold 3. Med Sci (Paris) 2024 ; 40 : 725–7. [Google Scholar]
  35. Jordan B. AlphaFold : un pas essentiel vers la fonction des protéines : Chroniques génomiques. Med Sci (Paris) 2021 ; 37 : 197–200. [Google Scholar]
  36. Jumper J, Evans R, Pritzel A, et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 2021 ; 596 : 583–9. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Varadi M, Anyango S, Deshpande M, et al. AlphaFold protein structure database: massively expanding the structural coverage of protein-sequence space with high-accuracy models. Nucleic Acids Res 2022; 50 : D439–44. [Google Scholar]
  38. Aguéro-Pizzolo S, Bettler E, Gouet P. Prix Nobel de chimie 2024: David Baker, Demis Hassabis et John M. Jumper - La révolution de l’intelligence artificielle en biologie structurale. Med Sci (Paris) 2025 ; 41 : 367–73. [Google Scholar]
  39. International human genome sequencing consortium. Finishing the euchromatic sequence of the human genome. Nature 2004 ; 431 : 931–45. [Google Scholar]
  40. Ozaki K, Ohnishi Y, Iida A, et al. Functional SNPs in the lymphotoxin-α gene that are associated with susceptibility to myocardial infarction. Nat Genet 2002; 32: 650–4. [Google Scholar]
  41. Mahajan A, Taliun D, Thurner M, et al. Fine-mapping type 2 diabetes loci to single-variant resolution using high-density imputation and islet-specific epigenome maps. Nat Genet 2018 ; 50 : 1505–13. [Google Scholar]
  42. Schizophrenia working group of the psychiatric genomics consortium. Biological insights from 108 schizophrenia-associated genetic loci. Nature 2014 ; 511 : 421–7. [Google Scholar]
  43. Yengo L, Vedantam S, Marouli E, et al. A saturated map of common genetic variants associated with human height. Nature 2022; 610 : 704–12. [Google Scholar]
  44. Moreau K, Clemenceau A, Le Moing V, et al. Human genetic susceptibility to native valve staphylococcus aureus endocarditis in patients with S. aureus bacteremia: genome-wide association study. Front Microbiol 2018 ; 9. [Google Scholar]
  45. Weber RE, Fuchs S, Layer F, et al. Genome-wide association studies for the detection of genetic variants associated with daptomycin and ceftaroline resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Front Microbiol 2021 ; 12: 639660. [Google Scholar]
  46. Young BC, Wu C-H, Charlesworth J, et al. Antimicrobial resistance determinants are associated with Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia and adaptation to the healthcare environment: a bacterial genome-wide association study. Microb Genom 2021 ; 7 : 000700. [Google Scholar]
  47. Nagalakshmi U, Wang Z, Waern K, et al. The transcriptional landscape of the yeast genome defined by RNA sequencing. Science 2008 ; 320 : 1344–9. [Google Scholar]
  48. Mortazavi A, Williams BA, McCue K, et al. Mapping and quantifying mammalian transcriptomes by RNA-Seq. Nat Methods 2008 ; 5 : 621–8. [Google Scholar]
  49. Wang Z, Gerstein M, Snyder M. RNA-Seq: a revolutionary tool for transcriptomics. Nat Rev Genet 2009 ; 10 : 57–63. [Google Scholar]
  50. Pan Q, Shai O, Lee LJ, et al. Deep surveying of alternative splicing complexity in the human transcriptome by high-throughput sequencing. Nat Genet 2008 ; 40 : 1413–5. [Google Scholar]
  51. Sultan M, Schulz MH, Richard H, et al. A global view of gene activity and alternative splicing by deep sequencing of the human transcriptome. Science 2008 ; 321 : 956–60. [Google Scholar]
  52. Cabili MN, Trapnell C, Goff L, et al. Integrative annotation of human large intergenic noncoding RNAs reveals global properties and specific subclasses. Genes Dev 2011 ; 25 : 1915–27. [Google Scholar]
  53. Chen X, Huang Y, Huang L, et al. A brain cell atlas integrating single-cell transcriptomes across human brain regions. Nat Med 2024 ; 30 : 2679–91. [Google Scholar]
  54. Wang Y, Li R, Tong R, et al. Integrating single-cell RNA and T cell/B cell receptor sequencing with mass cytometry reveals dynamic trajectories of human peripheral immune cells from birth to old age. Nat Immunol 2025 ; 26 : 308–22. [Google Scholar]
  55. Wilk AJ, Rustagi A, Zhao NQ, et al. A single-cell atlas of the peripheral immune response in patients with severe COVID-19. Nat Med 2020 ; 26 : 1070–6. [Google Scholar]
  56. Ren X, Wen W, Fan X, et al. COVID-19 immune features revealed by a large-scale single-cell transcriptome atlas. Cell 2021 ; 184 : 1895–913. [Google Scholar]
  57. La Manno G, Soldatov R, Zeisel A, et al. RNA velocity of single cells. Nature 2018 ; 560 : 494–8. [Google Scholar]
  58. Kim M-S, Pinto SM, Getnet D, et al. A draft map of the human proteome. Nature 2014 ; 509 : 575–81. [Google Scholar]
  59. Wilhelm M, Schlegl J, Hahne H, et al. Mass-spectrometry-based draft of the human proteome. Nature 2014 ; 509 : 582–7. [Google Scholar]
  60. Krug K, Jaehnig EJ, Satpathy S, et al. Proteogenomic landscape of breast cancer tumorigenesis and targeted therapy. Cell 2020 ; 183 : 1436–56. [Google Scholar]
  61. McDermott JE, Arshad OA, Petyuk VA, et al. Proteogenomic characterization of ovarian HGSC implicates mitotic kinases, replication stress in observed chromosomal instability. Cell Rep Med 2020 ; 1 : 100004. [Google Scholar]
  62. Sarkar S, Murphy MA, Dammer EB, et al. Comparative proteomic analysis highlights metabolic dysfunction in α-synucleinopathy. NPJ Parkinsons Dis 2020 ; 6 : 40. [Google Scholar]
  63. Yarbro JM, Shrestha HK, Wang Z, et al. Proteomic landscape of Alzheimer’s disease: emerging technologies, advances and insights (2021 – 2025). Mol Neurodegeneration 2025 ; 20 : 83. [Google Scholar]
  64. Reigada I, San-Martin-Galindo P, Gilbert-Girard S, et al. Surfaceome and Eexoproteome dynamics in dual-species Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus Biofilms. Front Microbiol 2021 ; 12: 672975. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.