EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
Home All issues Volume 32 / No 12 (Décembre 2016) Med Sci (Paris), 32 12 (2016) 1130-1134 References
Free Access
Issue
Med Sci (Paris)
Volume 32, Number 12, Décembre 2016
Page(s) 1130 - 1134
Section Forum
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/medsci/20163212018
Published online 03 January 2017
  1. Thaler RH, Sunstein CR, Pavillet MF. Nudge : la méthode douce pour inspirer la bonne décision Paris : Vuibert, 2012 : 480 p. [Google Scholar]
  2. Sauneron S. Centre d’analyse stratégique. Nouvelles approches de la prévention en santé publique l’apport des sciences comportementales, cognitives et des neurosciences. Paris : La Documentation Française, 2010 : 140 p. [Google Scholar]
  3. Wise J. Nudge or fudge? Doctors debate best approach to improve public health. Br Med J 2011 ; 342 : d580. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hansen PG, Skov LR, Skov KL Making healthy choices easier : regulation versus nudging. Annu Rev Public Health 2016 ; 37 : 237–251. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Quigley M. Nudging for health : on public policy and designing choice architecture. Med Law Rev 2013 ; 21 : 588–621. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Nudge Vallgårda S. A new and better way to improve health? Health Policy 2012 ; 104 : 200–203. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hausman DM, Welch B Debate : To nudge or not to nudge. J Polit Philos 2010 ; 18 : 123–136. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Schiavone G, De Anna G, Mameli M, et al. Libertarian paternalism and health care policy : a deliberative proposal. Med Health Care Philos 2014 ; 17 : 103–113. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Finley MI, Alexandre M. Démocratie antique et démocratie moderne Paris : Payot et Rivages, 2003 : 192 p. [Google Scholar]
  10. Berten A, da Silveira P, Pourtois H (eds). Libéraux et communautariens, 1re éd. Paris : PUF, 1997 : 412 p. [Google Scholar]
  11. Goodwin T. Why we should reject “Nudge”. Politics 2012 ; 32 : 85–92. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Heilmann C. Success conditions for nudges : a methodological critique of libertarian paternalism. Eur J Philos Sci 2014 ; 4 : 75–94. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Ploug T, Holm S, Brodersen J To nudge or not to nudge : cancer screening programmes and the limits of libertarian paternalism. J Epidemiol Community Health 2012 ; 66 : 1193–1196. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Sunstein CR Nudging : a very short guide. J Consum Policy 2014 ; 37 : 583–588. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Reach G. Patient education, nudge, and manipulation : defining the ethical conditions of the person-centered model of care. Patient Prefer Adherence 2016 ; 10 : 459–468. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Breton P. Convaincre sans manipuler : apprendre à argumenter Paris : La Découverte, 2008 : 152 p. [Google Scholar]
  17. Lockton D, Harrison D, Stanton N. Design with intent : persuasive technology in a wider context. In: Oinas-Kukkonen H, Hasle P, Harjumaa M, Segerståhl K, Øhrstrøm P (eds). Persuasive technology : third international conference. PERSUASIVE 2008, Oulu, Finland, June 4–6, 2008, proceedings. Berlin, Heidelberg : Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg, 2008 : 274–278. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Vinod M, Devadasan SR, Sunil DT, Thilak VMM Six Sigma through Poka-Yoke : a navigation through literature arena. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2015 ; 81 : 315–327. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Oinas-Kukkonen H, Harjumaa M. A systematic framework for designing and evaluating persuasive systems. In: Oinas-Kukkonen H, Hasle P, Harjumaa M, Segerståhl K, Øhrstrøm P (eds). Persuasive technology : third international conference. PERSUASIVE 2008, Oulu, Finland, June 4–6, 2008, proceedings. Berlin, Heidelberg : Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg, 2008 : 164–176. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. IJsselsteijn W, de Kort Y, Midden C, et al. Persuasive technology for human well-being : setting the scene. In: IJsselsteijn WA, de Kort YAW, Midden C, Eggen B, van den Hoven E (eds). Persuasive technology : first international conference on persuasive technology for human well-being. PERSUASIVE 2006, Eindhoven, The Netherlands, May 18–19, 2006, proceedings. Berlin, Heidelberg : Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg, 2006 : 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  21. Hamari J, Koivisto J, Pakkanen T. Do persuasive technologies persuade? A review of empirical studies. In: Spagnolli A, Chittaro L, Gamberini L (eds). Persuasive technology : 9th international conference. PERSUASIVE 2014, Padua, Italy, May 21–23, 2014, proceedings. Cham : Springer International Publishing, 2014 : 118–136. [Google Scholar]
  22. Matjasko JL, Cawley JH, Baker-Goering MM, Yokum DV Applying behavioral economics to public health policy. Am J Prev Med 2016 ; 50 : S13–S19. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kroese FM, Marchiori DR, de Ridder DTD Nudging healthy food choices : a field experiment at the train station. J Public Health 2016 ; 38 : e133–e137. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Libotte E, Siegrist M, Bucher T The influence of plate size on meal composition. Literature review and experiment. Appetite 2014 ; 82 : 91–96. [Google Scholar]
  25. Skov LR, Lourenço S, Hansen GL, et al. Choice architecture as a means to change eating behaviour in self-service settings : a systematic review. Choice architecture in self-service eating settings. Obes Rev 2013 ; 14 : 187–196. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Forget EL Paying people to be healthy. Int J Health Policy Manag 2013 ; 1 : 245–246. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Raihani NJ Nudge politics : efficacy and ethics. Front Psychol 2013 ; 4 : 972. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Boniolo G. Cancer, obesity and the legitimation of suggested lifestyles : a libertarian paternalism approach. Ecancermedicalscience 2015 ; 9 : 588. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Marteau TM, Ogilvie D, Roland M, et al. Judging nudging : can nudging improve population health? Br Med J 2011 ; 342 : d228. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Hollands GJ, Shemilt I, Marteau TM, et al. Altering micro-environments to change population health behaviour : towards an evidence base for choice architecture interventions. BMC Public Health 2013 ; 13 : 1218. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Hollands GJ, Shemilt I, Marteau TM, et al. Portion, package or tableware size for changing selection and consumption of food, alcohol and tobacco. In: The Cochrane collaboration (ed). Cochrane database of systematic reviews [Internet]. Chichester, UK : John Wiley and Sons Ltd, 2015. http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/14651858.CD011045.pub2. [Google Scholar]
  32. Soriano A, Rieu D, Oullier O Améliorer les stratégies de prévention du tabagisme à l’aide des sciences cognitives et des neurosciences. Med Sci (Paris) 2013 ; 29 : 1042–1050. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.