Augmenter les chances de succès de la FIV grâce au diagnostic génétique préimplantatoire des aneuploïdies (DPI-A) - Mythe ou réalité ?

Nelly Frydman

doi:10.1051/medsci/20163202001

Accueil

Tous les numéros

Volume 32 / Numéro 2 (Février 2016)

Med Sci (Paris), 32 2 (2016) 139-140

Références

Accès gratuit

Editorial

Numéro		Med Sci (Paris) Volume 32, Numéro 2, Février 2016


Page(s)		139 - 140
Section		Éditorial
DOI		https://doi.org/10.1051/medsci/20163202001
Publié en ligne		2 mars 2016

Staessen C, Platteau P, Van Assche E, et al. Comparison of blastocyst transfer with or without preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy screening in couples with advanced maternal age: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod 2004 ; 19 : 2849–2858. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Schoolcraft WB, Katz-Jaffe MG, Stevens J, et al. Preimplantation aneuploidy testing for infertile patients of advanced maternal age: a randomized prospective trial. Fertil Steril 2009 ; 92 : 157–162. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Debrock S, Melotte C, Spiessens C, et al. Preimplantation genetic screening for aneuploidy of embryos after in vitro fertilization in women aged at least 35 years: a prospective randomized trial. Fertil Steril 2010 ; 93 : 364–373. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Blockeel C, Schutyser V, De Vos A, et al. Prospectively randomized controlled trial of PGS in IVF/ICSI patients with poor implantation. Reprod Biomed Online 2008 ; 17 : 848–854. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Meyer LR, Klipstein S, Hazlett WD, et al. A prospective randomized controlled trial of preimplantation genetic screening in the good prognosis patient. Fertil Steril 2009 ; 91 : 1731–1738. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Staessen C, Verpoest W, Donoso P, et al. Preimplantation genetic screening does not improve delivery rate in women under the age of 36 following single-embryo transfer. Hum Reprod 2008 ; 23 : 2818–2825. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Mastenbroek S, Twisk M, van Echten-Arends J, et al. In vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic screening. N Engl J Med 2007 ; 357 : 9–17. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Hardarson T, Hanson C, Lundin K, et al. Preimplantation genetic screening in women of advanced maternal age caused a decrease in clinical pregnancy rate: a randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod 2008 ; 23 : 2806–2812. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Anderson RA, Pickering S. The current status of preimplantation genetic screening: British fertility society policy and practice guidelines. Hum Fertil (Camb) 2008 ; 11 : 71–75. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Practice committee of American society for reproductive medicine. Practice committee of Society for assisted reproductive technology. Preimplantation genetic testing: a Practice Committee opinion. Fertil Steril 2008 ; 90 : (suppl 5) : 36–43. [Google Scholar]
Harper J, Coonen E, De Rycke M, et al. What next for preimplantation genetic screening (PGS)? A position statement from the ESHRE PGD consortium steering committee. Hum Reprod 2010 ; 25 : 821–823. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Van Echten-Arends J1, Mastenbroek S, Sikkema-Raddatz B, et al. Chromosomal mosaicism in human preimplantation embryos: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update 2011 ; 17 : 620–627. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Keltz MD, Vega M, Sirota I, et al. Preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) with Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) following day 3 single cell blastomere biopsy markedly improves IVF outcomes while lowering multiple pregnancies and miscarriages. J Assist Reprod Genet 2013 ; 30 : 1333–1339. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Scott RT, Jr, Upham KM, Forman EJ, et al. Cleavage-stage biopsy significantly impairs human embryonic implantation potential while blastocyst biopsy does not: a randomized and paired clinical trial. Fertil Steril 2013 ; 100 : 624–630. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Yang Z, Liu J, Collins GS, et al. Selection of single blastocysts for fresh transfer via standard morphology assessment alone and with array CGH for good prognosis IVF patients: results from a randomized pilot study. Mol Cytogenet 2012 ; 5 : 24–29. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Forman EJ, Hong KH, Ferry KM, et al. In vitro fertilization with single euploid blastocyst transfer: a randomized controlled trial. Fertil Steril 2013 ; 100 : 100–107. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Scott RT, Jr, Upham KM, Forman EJ, et al. Blastocyst biopsy with comprehensive chromosome screening and fresh embryo transfer significantly increases in vitro fertilization implantation and delivery rates: a randomized controlled trial. Fertil Steril 2013 ; 100 : 697–703. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.

Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.

Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.

[1] Staessen C, Platteau P, Van Assche E, et al. Comparison of blastocyst transfer with or without preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy screening in couples with advanced maternal age: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod 2004 ; 19 : 2849–2858. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[2] Schoolcraft WB, Katz-Jaffe MG, Stevens J, et al. Preimplantation aneuploidy testing for infertile patients of advanced maternal age: a randomized prospective trial. Fertil Steril 2009 ; 92 : 157–162. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[3] Debrock S, Melotte C, Spiessens C, et al. Preimplantation genetic screening for aneuploidy of embryos after in vitro fertilization in women aged at least 35 years: a prospective randomized trial. Fertil Steril 2010 ; 93 : 364–373. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[4] Blockeel C, Schutyser V, De Vos A, et al. Prospectively randomized controlled trial of PGS in IVF/ICSI patients with poor implantation. Reprod Biomed Online 2008 ; 17 : 848–854. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[5] Meyer LR, Klipstein S, Hazlett WD, et al. A prospective randomized controlled trial of preimplantation genetic screening in the good prognosis patient. Fertil Steril 2009 ; 91 : 1731–1738. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[6] Staessen C, Verpoest W, Donoso P, et al. Preimplantation genetic screening does not improve delivery rate in women under the age of 36 following single-embryo transfer. Hum Reprod 2008 ; 23 : 2818–2825. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[7] Mastenbroek S, Twisk M, van Echten-Arends J, et al. In vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic screening. N Engl J Med 2007 ; 357 : 9–17. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[8] Hardarson T, Hanson C, Lundin K, et al. Preimplantation genetic screening in women of advanced maternal age caused a decrease in clinical pregnancy rate: a randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod 2008 ; 23 : 2806–2812. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[9] Anderson RA, Pickering S. The current status of preimplantation genetic screening: British fertility society policy and practice guidelines. Hum Fertil (Camb) 2008 ; 11 : 71–75. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[10] Practice committee of American society for reproductive medicine. Practice committee of Society for assisted reproductive technology. Preimplantation genetic testing: a Practice Committee opinion. Fertil Steril 2008 ; 90 : (suppl 5) : 36–43. [Google Scholar]

[11] Harper J, Coonen E, De Rycke M, et al. What next for preimplantation genetic screening (PGS)? A position statement from the ESHRE PGD consortium steering committee. Hum Reprod 2010 ; 25 : 821–823. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[12] Van Echten-Arends J1, Mastenbroek S, Sikkema-Raddatz B, et al. Chromosomal mosaicism in human preimplantation embryos: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update 2011 ; 17 : 620–627. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[13] Keltz MD, Vega M, Sirota I, et al. Preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) with Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) following day 3 single cell blastomere biopsy markedly improves IVF outcomes while lowering multiple pregnancies and miscarriages. J Assist Reprod Genet 2013 ; 30 : 1333–1339. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[14] Scott RT, Jr, Upham KM, Forman EJ, et al. Cleavage-stage biopsy significantly impairs human embryonic implantation potential while blastocyst biopsy does not: a randomized and paired clinical trial. Fertil Steril 2013 ; 100 : 624–630. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[15] Yang Z, Liu J, Collins GS, et al. Selection of single blastocysts for fresh transfer via standard morphology assessment alone and with array CGH for good prognosis IVF patients: results from a randomized pilot study. Mol Cytogenet 2012 ; 5 : 24–29. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[16] Forman EJ, Hong KH, Ferry KM, et al. In vitro fertilization with single euploid blastocyst transfer: a randomized controlled trial. Fertil Steril 2013 ; 100 : 100–107. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[17] Scott RT, Jr, Upham KM, Forman EJ, et al. Blastocyst biopsy with comprehensive chromosome screening and fresh embryo transfer significantly increases in vitro fertilization implantation and delivery rates: a randomized controlled trial. Fertil Steril 2013 ; 100 : 697–703. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]