EDP Sciences logo
Authentification abonné
Rechercher
Menu
Accueil Tous les numéros Volume 26 / Numéro 3 (Mars 2010) Med Sci (Paris), 26 3 (2010) 251-258 Références
Accès gratuit
Numéro
Med Sci (Paris)
Volume 26, Numéro 3, Mars 2010
Page(s) 251 - 258
Section M/S revues
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/medsci/2010263251
Publié en ligne 15 mars 2010
  1. Kemphues KJ, Priess JR, Morton DG, Cheng NS. Identification of genes required for cytoplasmic localization in early C. elegans embryos. Cell 1988; 52 : 311–20. [Google Scholar]
  2. Goldstein B, Hird SN. Specification of the anteroposterior axis in Caenorhabditis elegans. Development 1996; 122 : 1467–74. [Google Scholar]
  3. Munro E, Nance J, Priess JR. Cortical flows powered by asymmetrical contraction transport PAR proteins to establish and maintain anterior-posterior polarity in the early C. elegans embryo. Dev Cell 2004; 7 : 413–24. [Google Scholar]
  4. Cheeks RJ, Canman JC, Gabriel WN, et al. C. elegans PAR proteins function by mobilizing and stabilizing asymmetrically localized protein complexes. Curr Biol 2004; 14 : 851–62. [Google Scholar]
  5. Morton DG, Shakes DC, Nugent S, et al. The Caenorhabditis elegans par-5 gene encodes a 14-3-3 protein required for cellular asymmetry in the early embryo. Dev Biol 2002; 241 : 47–58. [Google Scholar]
  6. Cuenca AA, Schetter A, Aceto D, et al. Polarization of the C. elegans zygote proceeds via distinct establishment and maintenance phases. Development 2003; 130 : 1255–65. [Google Scholar]
  7. Doe CQ. Molecular markers for identified neuroblasts and ganglion mother cells in the Drosophila central nervous system. Development 1992; 116 : 855–63. [Google Scholar]
  8. Schober M, Schaefer M, Knoblich JA. Bazooka recruits Inscuteable to orient asymmetric cell divisions in Drosophila neuroblasts. Nature 1999; 402 : 548–51. [Google Scholar]
  9. Lu B, Rothenberg M, Jan LY, Jan YN. Partner of Numb colocalizes with Numb during mitosis and directs Numb asymmetric localization in Drosophila neural and muscle progenitors. Cell 1998; 95 : 225–35. [Google Scholar]
  10. Kuang S, Kuroda K, Le Grand F, Rudnicki MA. Asymmetric self-renewal and commitment of satellite stem cells in muscle. Cell 2007; 129 : 999–1010. [Google Scholar]
  11. Shinin V, Gayraud-Morel B, Gomes D, Tajbakhsh S. Asymmetric division and cosegregation of template DNA strands in adult muscle satellite cells. Nat Cell Biol 2006; 8 : 677–87. [Google Scholar]
  12. Noctor SC, Martinez-Cerdeno V, Ivic L, Kriegstein AR. Cortical neurons arise in symmetric and asymmetric division zones and migrate through specific phases. Nat Neurosci 2004; 7 : 136–44. [Google Scholar]
  13. Wu M, Kwon HY, Rattis F, et al. Imaging hematopoietic precursor division in real time. Cell Stem Cell 2007; 1 : 541–54. [Google Scholar]
  14. Lechler T, Fuchs E. Asymmetric cell divisions promote stratification and differentiation of mammalian skin. Nature 2005; 437 : 275–80. [Google Scholar]
  15. Costa MR, Wen G, Lepier A, et al. Par-complex proteins promote proliferative progenitor divisions in the developing mouse cerebral cortex. Development 2008; 135 : 11–22. [Google Scholar]
  16. Labbé JC, McCarthy EK, Goldstein B. The forces that position a mitotic spindle asymmetrically are tethered until after the time of spindle assembly. J Cell Biol 2004; 167 : 245–56. [Google Scholar]
  17. Gotta M, Ahringer J. Distinct roles for Galpha and Gbetagamma in regulating spindle position and orientation in Caenorhabditis elegans embryos. Nat Cell Biol 2001; 3 : 297–300. [Google Scholar]
  18. Srinivasan DG, Fisk RM, Xu H, van den Heuvel S. A complex of LIN-5 and GPR proteins regulates G protein signaling and spindle function in C. elegans. Genes Dev 2003; 17 : 1225–39. [Google Scholar]
  19. Schaefer M, Shevchenko A, Knoblich JA. A protein complex containing Inscuteable and the Galpha-binding protein Pins orients asymmetric cell divisions in Drosophila. Curr Biol 2000; 10 : 353–62. [Google Scholar]
  20. Wodarz A, Ramrath A, Kuchinke U, Knust E. Bazooka provides an apical cue for Inscuteable localization in Drosophila neuroblasts. Nature 1999; 402 : 544–7. [Google Scholar]
  21. Sanada K, Tsai LH. G protein betagamma subunits and AGS3 control spindle orientation and asymmetric cell fate of cerebral cortical progenitors. Cell 2005; 122 : 119–31. [Google Scholar]
  22. Zigman M, Cayouette M, Charalambous C, et al. Mammalian inscuteable regulates spindle orientation and cell fate in the developing retina. Neuron 2005; 48 : 539–45. [Google Scholar]
  23. Mello CC, Schubert C, Draper B, et al. The PIE-1 protein and germline specification in C. elegans embryos.Nature 1996; 382 : 710–2. [Google Scholar]
  24. Strome S, Wood WB. Generation of asymmetry and segregation of germ-line granules in early C. elegans embryos. Cell 1983; 35 : 15–25. [Google Scholar]
  25. Reese KJ, Dunn MA, Waddle JA, Seydoux G. Asymmetric segregation of PIE-1 in C. elegans is mediated by two complementary mechanisms that act through separate PIE-1 protein domains. Mol Cell 2000; 6 : 445–55. [Google Scholar]
  26. Betschinger J, Mechtler K, Knoblich JA. The Par complex directs asymmetric cell division by phosphorylating the cytoskeletal protein Lgl. Nature 2003; 422 : 326–30. [Google Scholar]
  27. Guo M, Jan LY, Jan YN. Control of daughter cell fates during asymmetric division: interaction of Numb and Notch. Neuron 1996; 17 : 27–41. [Google Scholar]
  28. Choksi SP, Southall TD, Bossing T, et al. Prospero acts as a binary switch between self-renewal and differentiation in Drosophila neural stem cells. Dev Cell 2006; 11 : 775–89. [Google Scholar]
  29. Betschinger J, Mechtler K, Knoblich JA. Asymmetric segregation of the tumor suppressor brat regulates self-renewal in Drosophila neural stem cells. Cell 2006; 124 : 1241–53. [Google Scholar]
  30. Lee CY, Wilkinson BD, Siegrist SE, et al. Brat is a Miranda cargo protein that promotes neuronal differentiation and inhibits neuroblast self-renewal. Dev Cell 2006; 10 : 441–9. [Google Scholar]
  31. Hyenne V, Desrosiers M, Labbé JC. C. elegans Brat homologs regulate PAR protein-dependent polarity and asymmetric cell division. Dev Biol 2008; 321 : 368–78. [Google Scholar]
  32. Caussinus E, Gonzalez C. Induction of tumor growth by altered stem-cell asymmetric division in Drosophila melanogaster. Nat Genet 2005; 37 : 1125–9. [Google Scholar]
  33. Lee CY, Robinson KJ, Doe CQ. Lgl, Pins and aPKC regulate neuroblast self-renewal versus differentiation.Nature 2006; 439 : 594–8. [Google Scholar]
  34. Bowman SK, Neumuller RA, Novatchkova M, et al. The Drosophila NuMA Homolog Mud regulates spindle orientation in asymmetric cell division. Dev Cell 2006; 10 : 731–42. [Google Scholar]
  35. Bonnet D, Dick JE. Human acute myeloid leukemia is organized as a hierarchy that originates from a primitive hematopoietic cell. Nat Med 1997; 3 : 730–7. [Google Scholar]
  36. Al-Hajj M, Wicha MS, Benito-Hernandez A, et al. Prospective identification of tumorigenic breast cancer cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003; 100 : 3983–8. [Google Scholar]
  37. Singh SK, Clarke ID, Terasaki M, et al. Identification of a cancer stem cell in human brain tumors. Cancer Res 2003; 63 : 5821–8. [Google Scholar]
  38. Gönczy P. Mechanisms of cell division: lessons from a nematode. Med Sci (Paris) 2003; 19 : 735–42 [Google Scholar]
  39. Ségalen M, David N, Bellaïche Y. The heterotrimeric G proteins during asymmetric cell division in Drosophila. Med Sci (Paris) 2006; 22 : 243–6. [Google Scholar]

Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.

Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.

Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.