Accès gratuit
Med Sci (Paris)
Volume 23, Numéro 11, Novembre 2007
Page(s) 904 - 909
Section M/S revues
Publié en ligne 15 novembre 2007
  1. Labelle H, Dansereau J. Orthotic treatment of paediatric spinal disorders and diseases. Spine 1990; 4 : 239–49.
  2. Stokes IA, Aubin CE. Biomechanics of scoliosis. In: Encyclopedia of medical devices and instrumentation, vol. 6, 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 2006 : 122–37.
  3. Delorme S, Petit Y, de Guise JA, et al. Assessment of the 3-D reconstruction and high-resolution geometrical modeling of the human skeletal trunk from 2-D radiographic images. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2003; 50 : 989–98.
  4. Aubin CE, Descrimes JL, Dansereau J, et al. Geometrical modeling of the spine and the thorax for the biomechanical analysis of scoliotic deformities using the finite element method. Ann Chir 1995; 49 : 749–61.
  5. Labelle H, Dansereau J, Bellefleur C, et al. Comparison between preoperative and postoperative three-dimensional reconstructions of idiopathic scoliosis with the Cotrel-Dubousset procedure. Spine 1995; 20 : 2487–92.
  6. Pazos V, Cheriet F, Song L, et al. Accuracy assessment of human trunk surface 3D reconstructions from an optical digitising system. Med Biol Eng Comput 2005; 43 : 11–5.
  7. Hall JE, Miller ME, Shumann W, Stanish W. A refined concept in the orthotic management of scoliosis. Orthop Prosthet 1975; 29 : 6–19.
  8. Emans JB, Kaelin A, Bancel P, et al. The Boston bracing system for idiopathic scoliosis : follow-up results in 295 patients. Spine 1986; 11 : 792–801.
  9. Watts HG, Hall JE, Stanish W. The Boston brace system for the treatment of low thoracic and lumbar scoliosis by the use of a girdle without superstructure. Clin Orthop 1977; 126 : 87–92.
  10. Rowe DE, Bernstein SM, Riddick MF, et al. A meta-analysis of the efficacy of non-operative treatments for idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg 1997; 79 : 664–74.
  11. Edgar MA. To brace or not to brace ? J Bone Joint Surg 1985; 67B : 173–4.
  12. Labelle H, Dansereau J, Bellefleur C, Poitras B. Three-dimensional effect of the Boston brace on the thoracic spine and rib cage. Spine 1996; 21 : 59-64. Erratum in Spine 1996; 21 : 890.
  13. Aubin CE, Dansereau J, de Guise JA, Labelle H. Rib cage-spine coupling patterns involved in brace treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 1997; 22 : 629–35.
  14. Aubin CE, Dansereau J, de Guise JA, Labelle H. A study of biomechanical coupling between spine and rib cage in the treatment by orthosis of scoliosis. Ann Chir 1996; 50 (8) : 641–50.
  15. Coillard C, Leroux MA, Zabjek KF, Rivard CH. SpineCor : a non-rigid brace for the treatment of idiopathic scoliosis. Post-treatment results. Eur Spine J 2003; 12 : 141–8.
  16. White AA, Panjabi MM. (1978) Clinical Biomechanics of the Spine, Philadelphia, J.B. Lippincott, 1978 : 735p.
  17. Wong MS, Evans JH. Biomechanical evaluation of the Milwaukee brace. Prost Orthot Intern 1998; 22 : 54–67.
  18. Jiang H, Raso W, Hill D, et al. Interface pressure in the Boston brace treatment for scoliosis : a preliminary study. Montréal : Int Symposium 3D Scoliotic Deformities, 1992 : 395–9.
  19. MacThiong JM, Petit Y, Aubin CE, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of the Boston brace system for the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2004; 29 : 26–32.
  20. Bellefleur C, Aubin CE, Cheriet F, Labelle H. Validation of a clinical tool for brace design and adjustment. In : Sawatzky BJ, ed. International research society of spinal deformities. UBC Press, 2004 : 18–22.
  21. Aubin CE, Labelle H, Ruszkowski A, et al. Variability of strap tension in brace treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 1999; 24 : 349–54.
  22. Wynarsky GT, Schultz AB. Trunk muscle activities in braced scoliosis patients. Spine 1989; 14 : 1283–6.
  23. Odermatt D, Mathieu PA, Beauséjour M, et al. Electromyography of scoliotic patients treated with a brace. J Orthop Res 2003; 21 : 931–6.
  24. Aubin CE. Finite element analysis for the biomechanical study of scoliosis (chapter 21). Spine state of the art review on the etiology of idiopathic scoliosis. In: Burwell RG, et al., eds. Philadelphia: Hanley and Belfus Inc, 2000 : 498–504.
  25. Beauséjour M, Aubin CE, Feldman AG, Labelle H. Simulation of lateral bending tests using a musculoskeletal model of the trunk. Ann Chirurgie 1999; 53 (8) : 742–50.
  26. Périé D, Aubin CE, Petit Y, et al. Personalized biomechanical simulations of orthotic treatment in idiopathic scoliosis. Clinical Biomechanics 2004; 19 : 190–5.
  27. Gignac D, Aubin CE, Dansereau J, et al. A biomechanical study of new orthotic treatment approaches for the 3D correction of scoliosis. Ann Chir 1998; 52 : 795–800.
  28. Gignac D, Aubin CE, Dansereau J, Labelle H. Optimization method for 3D bracing correction of scoliosis using a finite element model. European Spine J 2000; 9 : 185–90.
  29. Clin J, Aubin CE, Parent S, et al. Biomechanical modeling of brace design. In : Uyttendaele D, Dangerfield PH, eds. Research into spinal deformities 5. Studies in health technology and informatics. IOS Press, 2006; 123 : 255–60.
  30. Labelle H, Bellefleur C, Joncas J, et al. Preliminary evaluation of a computer-assisted tool for the design and adjustment of braces in idiopathic scoliosis: a prospective and randomized study. Spine 2007; 32 : 835–43.
  31. Villemure I, Aubin CE, Dansereau J, Labelle. Simulation of progressive deformities in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using biomechanical model integrating vertebral growth modulation. J Biomech Eng 2002; 124 : 784–90.
  32. Villemure I, Aubin CE, Dansereau J, Labelle H. Biomechanical simulations of the spine deformation process in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis from different pathogenesis hypotheses. Eur Spine J 2004; 13 : 83–90.

Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.

Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.

Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.