Accès gratuit
Med Sci (Paris)
Volume 19, Numéro 5, Mai 2003
Page(s) 567 - 574
Section M/S Revues
Publié en ligne 15 mai 2003
  1. Lipton JA, Ship JA, Larach- Robinson D. Estimated prevalence and distribution of reported orofacial pain in the United States. J Am Dent Assoc 1993; 124: 115–21.
  2. Julius D, Basbaum AI. Molecular mechanisms of nociception. Nature 2001; 413: 203–10.
  3. Bolay H, Reuter U, Dunn AK, Huang Z, Boas DA, Moskowitz MA. Intrinsic brain activity triggers trigeminal meningeal afferents in a migraine model. Nat Neurosci 2002; 8: 136–42.
  4. Burstein R. Deconstructing migraine headache into peripheral and central sensitization. Pain 2001; 89: 107–10.
  5. Gerard MW. Afferent impulses of the trigeminal nerve. The intramedullary course of the painful thermal and tactile impulses. Arch Neurol Psychiatr 1923; 9: 306–38.
  6. Sjöqvist O. Studies on pain conduction in the trigeminal nerve contribution to surgical treatment of facial pain. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1939; 17:1–139.
  7. Young RF. Effect of trigeminal tractotomy on dental sensation in humans. J Neurosurg 1982; 56: 812–8.
  8. Graham SH, Sharp FR, Dillon W. Intraoral sensation in patient with brain stem lesions: role of the rostral spinal trigeminal nuclei in pons. Neurology 1988; 38: 1529–33.
  9. Dallel R, Raboisson P, Woda A, Sessle BJ. Properties of nociceptive and nonnociceptive neurons in trigeminal subnucleus oralis of the rat. Brain Res 1990; 521: 95–106.
  10. Dallel R, Duale C, Luccarini P, Molat JL. Stimulusfunction, wind-up and modulation by diffuse noxious inhibitory controls of responses of convergent neurons of the spinal trigeminal nucleus oralis. Eur J Neurosci 1999; 11: 31–40.
  11. Pajot J, Pelissier T, Sierralta F, Raboisson P, Dallel R. Differential effects of trigeminal tractotomy on Aδ- and C-fiber-mediated nociceptive responses. Brain Res 2000; 863: 289–92.
  12. Raboisson P, Dallel R, Woda A. Responses of neurones in the ventrobasal complex of the thalamus to orofacial noxious stimulation after large trigeminal tractotomy. Exp Brain Res 1989; 77: 569–76.
  13. Hu JW, Sessle BJ, Raboisson P, Dallel R, Woda A. Stimulation of craniofacial muscle afferents induces prolonged facilitatory effects in trigeminal nociceptive brain-stem neurones. Pain 1992; 48: 53–60.
  14. Hu JW, Woda A, Sessle BJ. Effects of pre-emptive local anaesthesia on tooth pulp deafferentationinduced neuroplastic changes in cat trigeminal brainstem neurones. Arch Oral Biol 1999; 44: 287–93.
  15. Dallel R, Duale C, Molat JL. Morphine administered in the substantia gelatinosa of the spinal trigeminal nucleus caudalis inhibits nociceptive activities in the spinal trigeminal nucleus oralis. J Neurosci 1998; 18: 3529–36.
  16. Ressot C, Collado V, Molat JL, Dallel R. Strychnine alters response properties of trigeminal nociceptive neurons in the rat. J Neurophysiol 2001; 86: 3069–72.
  17. Woda A, Molat JL, Luccarini P. Low doses of NMDA antagonists in superficial laminae of medulla oblongata facilitate windup of convergent neurons. Neuroscience 2001; 107: 317–27.
  18. Voisin D, Luccarini P, Chalus M, Dallel R, Besson JM. Substance P receptor activation contributes to the windup of nociceptive neurons of the rat spinal trigeminal nucleus oralis. Society for Neuroscience, 32th annual meeting, Orlando, 2002. Washington DC: Society for Neuroscience, 2002; 28: 452.
  19. Dallel R, Ricard O, Raboisson P. Organization of parabrachial projections from the spinal trigeminal nucleus oralis: an anterograde tracing study in the rat. J Comp Neurol 2003 (sous presse).
  20. Voisin D, Guy N, Chalus M, Dallel R, Renaud B. Projections of the spinal trigeminal nucleus oralis to the thalamus: a retrograde tracing study in the rat. Society for Neuroscience, 31th annual meeting, San Diego, 2001. Washington DC: Society for Neuroscience, 2001; 27: 1618.
  21. Ahissar E, Sosnik R, Haidarliu S. Transformation from temporal to rate coding in a somatosensory thalamocortical pathway. Nature 2000; 406: 302–6.
  22. Besson JM, Chaouch A. Peripheral and spinal mechanisms of nociception. Physiol Rev 1987; 67: 67–185.
  23. Luccarini P, Cadet R, Duale C, Woda A. Effects of lesions in the trigeminal oralis and caudalis subnuclei on different orofacial nociceptive responses in the rat. Brain Res 1998; 24: 79–85.
  24. Voisin D, Chalus M, Doméjean-Orliaguet S, Dallel R, Woda A. Ascending intranuclear connections relaying nociceptive information from the caudal part to the oral part of the spinal trigeminal nucleus in the rat. In: Pain in Europe III: Advances in pain research and therapy. Nice: European Federation of IASP, 2000 : 192.
  25. Woda A. Blanc O, Molat JL, Besson JM, Luccarini P. Nmethyl- D-aspartate receptors of substantia gelatinosa medite an inhibitory influence on central sensitization of nociceptive trigeminal neurons. Society for Neuroscience, 31th annual meeting, San Diego, 2001. Washington DC: Society for Neuroscience, 2001; 27: 425.
  26. Villanueva L, Nathan PW. Multiple pain pathways. In: Devor M, Rowbotham MC, Wiesendfeld-Hallin Z, eds. Proceedings of the 9th World Congress on Pain. Seattle: IASP Press, 2000 : 371–86.
  27. Rainville P. Brain mechanisms of pain affect and pain modulation. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2002; 12: 195–204.
  28. Ergenzinger ER, Glasier MM, Hahm JO, Pons TP. Cortically induced thalamic plasticity in the primate somatosensory system. Nat Neurosci 1998; 1: 226–9.
  29. Krupa DJ, Ghazanfar AA, Nicolelis MA. Immediate thalamic sensory plasticity depends on corticothalamic feedback. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999; 96: 8200–5.
  30. Desbois C, Le Bars D, Villanueva L. Organization of cortical projections to the medullary subnucleus reticularis dorsalis: a retrograde and anterograde tracing study in the rat. J Comp Neurol 1999; 410: 178–96.
  31. Bushnell MC, Duncan GH, Dubner R, He LF. Activity of trigeminothalamic neurons in medullary dorsal horn of awake monkeys trained in a thermal discrimination task. J Neurophysiol 1984; 52: 170–87.
  32. Dallel R, Voisin D. Towards a pain treatment based on the identification of the pain-generating mechanisms ? Eur Neurol 2001; 45: 126–32.

Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.

Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.

Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.