EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
Home All issues Volume 41 (Octobre 2025) Hors série n° 1 Med Sci (Paris), 41 (2025) 145-150 References
Free Access
Issue
Med Sci (Paris)
Volume 41, Octobre 2025
40 ans de médecine/sciences
Page(s) 145 - 150
Section Histoire, philosophie des sciences
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/medsci/2025114
Published online 10 October 2025
  1. Bateson P. The return of the whole organism. J Biosci 2005; 30 : 31–9. [Google Scholar]
  2. Huneman P, Noûs C. Retour de l’organisme ou retour du refoulé ? Les raisons d’un clivage en biologie évolutive. In : Legea V, Lefèvre V, eds. De la finalité organique un instrument scientfique hérité de la métaphysique? Paris : Ed Matériologiques, 2023 : 226. [Google Scholar]
  3. Nicholson DJ. The return of the organism as a fundamental explanatory concept in biology. Philos Compass 2014; 9 : 347–59. [Google Scholar]
  4. Lopez-Beltran C. Forging heredity: from metaphor to cause, a reification story. Stud Hist Philos Sci 1994; 25 : 211–35. [Google Scholar]
  5. Van der Lugt M, de Miramon C. Penser l’hérédité au Moyen Âge : une introduction In : Van der Lugt M. de Miramon C, eds. L’hérédité entre Moyen Âge et époque moderne Perspectives historiques Florence : Sismel Edizioni del Galluzzo, 2008 : 3–37. [Google Scholar]
  6. Müller-Wille S, Rheinberger H-J. Heredity – the formation of an epistemic space In : Müller-Wille S, Rheinberger H-J, eds. Heredity produced: at the crossroads of biology, politics, and culture, 1500-1870. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press, 2007 : 3–34. [Google Scholar]
  7. Gayon J, Petit V. La connaissance de la vie aujourd’hui. London : ISTE Group, 2018 : 540p. [Google Scholar]
  8. Darwin C. De la variation des animaux et des plantes sous l’action de la domestication. tome 2. Paris : Hachette Bnf, Ed. 1868 (2005) : 558 p. [Google Scholar]
  9. Galton F. A Theory of Heredity. J AnthropolInst Great Britain Ireland 1876; 5 : 329–48. [Google Scholar]
  10. Galton F. On Blood-Relationship. Proc R Soc London 1871; 20 : 394–402. [Google Scholar]
  11. Weisman A. Essais sur l’hérédité et la sélection naturelle (Ed.1892). Paris, France : Hachette Livre Bnf, 2021 : 590 p. [Google Scholar]
  12. Johannsen W. The genotype conception of heredity. 1911. Int J Epidemiol 2014; 43 : 989–1 000. [Google Scholar]
  13. Morange M. La part des gènes. Paris : Odile Jacob, 1998 : 226 p. [Google Scholar]
  14. Waddington CH. The epigenotype. 1942. Int J Epidemiol 2012; 41 : 10–3. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Fox Keller E. The century of the gene. Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press, 2000 : 186 p. [Google Scholar]
  16. Gayon J. La genetique est-elle encore une discipline ? Med Sci (Paris) 2004; 20 : 248–53. [Google Scholar]
  17. Portin P. The concept of the gene: short history and present status. Q Rev Biol 1993; 68 : 173–223. [Google Scholar]
  18. Jacob F. La logique du vivant : une histoire de l’hérédité / François Jacob. Paris : Gallimard, 1976 : 352 p. [Google Scholar]
  19. Bonduriansky R, Day T. Extended heredity. A new understanding of inheritance and evolution. Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press, 2018 : 280 p. [Google Scholar]
  20. Jablonka E, Lamb MJ. Evolution in four dimensions: Genetic, epigenetic, behavioral, and symbolic variation in the history of life. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press, 2005 : 472 p. [Google Scholar]
  21. Bonduriansky R. Rethinking heredity, again. Trends Ecol Evol 2012; 27 : 330–6. [Google Scholar]
  22. Jablonka E, Raz G. Transgenerational epigenetic inheritance: prevalence, mechanisms, and implications for the study of heredity and evolution. Q Rev Biol 2009; 84 : 131–76. [Google Scholar]
  23. Griffiths PE, Gray RD. Developmental Systems and Evolutionary Explanation. J Philos 1994; 91 : 277–304. [Google Scholar]
  24. Oyama S. The Ontogeny of Information: Developmental Systems and Evolution. Durham, NC : Duke University Press, 2000 : 296 p. [Google Scholar]
  25. Oyama S. Stasis, development, and heredity: models of stability and change. Evolution’s eye: a systems view of the biology-culture divide. Durham, NC : Duke University Press, 2000 : 77–95. [Google Scholar]
  26. Keller EF. From gene action to reactive genomes. J Physiol 2014; 592 : 2423–9. [Google Scholar]
  27. Pontarotti G, Mossio M, Pocheville A. The genotype-phenotype distinction: from Mendelian genetics to 21st century biology. Genetica 2022; 150 : 223–34. [Google Scholar]
  28. Champagne FA. Epigenetic mechanisms and the transgenerational effects of maternal care. Front Neuroendocrinol 2008; 29 : 386–97. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Lamm E, and Jablonka E. The Nurture of Nature: Hereditary Plasticity in Evolution. Philosophical Psychology 2008; 21 : 305–19. [Google Scholar]
  30. Loison L. Lamarckism and epigenetic inheritance: a clarification. Biol Philos 2018 ; 33 : 29. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.