Accès gratuit
Numéro
Med Sci (Paris)
Volume 29, Numéro 11, Novembre 2013
Page(s) 1042 - 1050
Section Forum
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/medsci/20132911022
Publié en ligne 20 novembre 2013
  1. Cour des Comptes. Rapport d’évaluation. Les politiques de lutte contre le tabagisme. Paris : Cour des Comptes, 2012 : 332 p.
  2. Beck F, Guignard R, Richard J, et al. Premiers résultats du baromètre santé 2010. Évolutions récentes du tabagisme en France. Saint Denis : Inpes, 2010 : 14 p.
  3. Organisation Mondiale de la Santé. Convention-cadre pour la lutte antitabac. Genève : OMS, 2003 : 38 p.
  4. Hammond D. Health warning messages on tobacco products: a review. Tob Control 2011 ; 20 : 327–337. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Ruiter R, Kok G. Saying is not (always) doing: cigarette warning labels are useless. Eur J Pub Health 2005 ; 15 : 329. [CrossRef]
  6. Steinhart Y, Carmon Z, Trope Y. Warnings of adverse side effects can backfire over time. Psychol Sci 2013 ; 24 : 1842–1847. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Gallopel-Morvan K, Gabriel P, Gall-Ely M, et al. The use of visual warnings in social marketing: the case of tobacco. J Bus Res 2011 ; 64 : 7–11. [CrossRef]
  8. TNS Opinion and social. Eurobarometer 385-Attitudes of Europeans towards tobacco. Bruxelles : Commission européenne, 2012 : 102 p.
  9. Sambrook research International. A review of the science base to support the development of health warnings for tobacco packages. Newport : Sambrook Research International, 2009 : 46 p.
  10. TNS Qual+. Avertissements relatifs à la santé sur les emballages de produits du tabac. Bruxelles : Commission européenne, 2012 : 110 p.
  11. Tversky A, Kabneman D. Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science 1974 ; 185 : 1124–1131. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Bargh JA, Schwader KL, Hailey SE, et al. Automaticity in social-cognitive processes. Trends Cogn Sci 2012 ; 16 : 593–605. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Nisbett RE, Wilson TD, Kruger M, et al. Telling more than we can know: verbal reports on mental processes. Psychol Rev 1977 ; 84 : 231–259. [CrossRef]
  14. Johansson P, Hall L, Sikström S, et al. How something can be said about telling more than we can know: on choice blindness and introspection. Conscious Cogn 2006 ; 15 : 673–692. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Falk EB, Berkman ET, Mann T, et al. Predicting persuasion-induced behavior change from the brain. J Neurosci 2010 ; 30 : 8421–8424. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Calvert G, Gallopel-morvan K, Sauneron S. Dans le cerveau du fumeur : neurosciences et prévention du tabagisme. In : Oullier O, Sauneron S, eds. Nouvelles approches de la prévention en santé publique : l’apport des sciences comportementales, cognitives et des neurosciences. Paris : La Documentation Française, 2010 : 86–107.
  17. Oullier O, Sauneron S. Nouvelles approches de la prévention en santé publique : l’apport des sciences comportementales, cognitives et des neurosciences. Paris : La Documentation Française, 2010 : 192 p. Téléchargement légal et gratuit : http://www.ladocumentationfrancaise.fr/rapports-publics/104000139/index.shtml
  18. Institut National du Cancer. Les changements de comportements à risque de cancer et leurs déterminants individuels et collectifs. Boulogne-Billancourt : Inca, 2012 : 68 p.
  19. Falk E, Berkman ET, Lieberman MD. From neural responses to population behavior: neural focus group predicts population level media effects. Psychol Sci 2012 ; 3 : 439–445. [CrossRef]
  20. Berkman ET, Falk, EB. Beyond brain mapping: using the brain to predict real-world outcomes. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 2013 ; 22 : 45–50. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Lust SA, Bartholow, BD. Self-reported and P3 event-related potential evaluations of condoms: does what we say match how we feel? Psychophysiology 2009 ; 46 : 420–424. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Basso F, Oullier O. Différences individuelles, variabilités et limites actuelles du recours à l’imagerie cérébrale fonctionnelle par les tribunaux. In: Oullier O, ed. Le cerveau et la loi : analyse de l’émergence du neurodroit. Paris : Centre d’analyse stratégique, 2012 : 119–136.
  23. Petit O, Basso F, Huguet P, et al. Apport des « neurosciences de la décision » à l’étude des comportements alimentaires et de l’obésité. Med Sci (Paris) 2011 ; 27 : 1000–1008. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed]
  24. Oullier O. Neuroéconomie et neuroéthique. In : Claeys A, Vialatte JS, eds. La Loi bioéthique de demain. Paris : Rapport de l’Opecst, 2008 ; tome 2 : 196–202.
  25. Poldrack RA. Inferring mental states from neuroimaging data: from reverse inference to large-scale decoding. Neuron 2011 ; 72 : 692–697. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Logothetis NK. What we can do and what we cannot do with fMRI. Nature 2008 ; 453 : 869–878. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Wakefield M, Morley C, Horan JK, et al. The cigarette pack as image: new evidence from tobacco industry documents. Tob Control 2002 ; 11 : I73–I80. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Laviolette SR, van der Kooy D. The neurobiology of nicotine addiction: bridging the gap from molecules to behaviour. Nat Rev Neurosci 2004 ; 5 : 55–65. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Brehm JW. A theory of psychological reactance. New York : Academic Press, 1966 : 136 p.
  30. Festinger L. A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford : Stanford University Press, 1957 : 292 p.
  31. Kessels LTE, Ruiter RAC, Jansma BM. Increased attention but more efficient disengagement: neuroscientific evidence for defensive processing of threatening health information. Health Psychol 2010 ; 29 : 346–354. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Ruiter RAC, Schmitt B, Wouters L. Attention effects during the perception of threatening health video scenes: an event related potential approach. Los Angeles : The 4th Annual Meeting of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, 2003.
  33. Langleben DD, Loughead JW, Ruparel K, et al. Reduced prefrontal and temporal processing and recall of high sensation value ads. NeuroImage 2009 ; 46 : 219–225. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Uncapher MR, Wagner AD. Posterior parietal cortex and episodic encoding: insights from fMRI subsequent effects and dual-attention theory. Neurobiol Learn Mem 2009 ; 91 : 139–154. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Munafò MR, Roberts N, Bauld L, et al. Plain packaging increases visual attention to health warnings on cigarette packs in non-smokers and weekly smokers but not daily smokers. Addiction 2011 ; 106 : 1505–1510. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Maynard OM, Munafò MR, Leonards U. Visual attention to health warnings on plain tobacco packaging in adolescent smokers and non-smokers. Addiction 2012 ; 108 : 413–419. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Volkow ND, Li TK. Drug addiction: the neurobiology of behaviour gone awry. Nat Rev Neurosci 2004 ; 5 : 963–970. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Chiu PH, Lohrenz TM, Montague PR. Smokers’ brains compute, but ignore, a fictive error signal in a sequential investment task. Nat Neurosci 2008 ; 11 : 514–520. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Bickel WK, Odum AL, Madden GJ. Impulsivity and cigarette smoking: delay discounting in current, never, and ex-smokers. Psychopharmacology 1999 ; 146 : 447–454. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Field M, Cox WM. Attentional bias in addictive behaviors: a review of its development, causes, and consequences. Drug Alcohol Depend 2008 ; 97 : 1–20. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Robinson TE, Berridge KC. The neural basis of drug craving: an incentive-sensitization theory of addiction. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 1993 ; 18 : 247–291. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Stippekohl B, Winkler M, Mucha RF, et al. Neural responses to BEGIN- and END-stimuli of the smoking ritual in nonsmokers, nondeprived smokers, and deprived smokers. Neuropsychopharmacology 2010 ; 35 : 1209–1225. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Partos TR, Borland R, Yong HH, et al. Cigarette packet warning labels can prevent relapse: findings from the international tobacco control 4-country policy evaluation cohort study. Tob Control 2012 ; 22 : e43–e50. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Kober H, Mende-Siedlecki P, Kross EF, et al. Prefrontal-striatal pathway underlies cognitive regulation of craving. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010 ; 107 : 14811–14816. [CrossRef]
  45. Chua HF, Ho SS, Jasinska AJ, et al. Self-related neural response to tailored smoking-cessation messages predicts quitting. Nat Neurosci 2011 ; 14 : 426–427. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Hare TA, Camerer CF, Rangel A. Self-control in decision-making involves modulation of the vmPFC valuation system. Science 2009 ; 324 : 646–648. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Hare TA, Malmaud J, Rangel A. Focusing attention on the health aspects of foods changes value signals in vmPFC and improves dietary choice. J Neurosci 2011 ; 31 : 11077–11087. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Volkow ND, Wang G-J, Telang F, et al. Low dopamine striatal D2 receptors are associated with prefrontal metabolism in obese subjects: possible contributing factors. NeuroImage 2008 ; 42 : 1537–1543. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Amiaz R, Levy D, Vainiger D, et al. Repeated high-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex reduces cigarette craving and consumption. Addiction 2009 ; 104 : 653–660. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Eichhammer P, Johann M, Kharraz A, et al. High-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation decreases cigarette smoking. J Clin Psychiatry 2003 ; 64 : 951–953. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Rose JE, McClernon FJ, Froeliger B, et al. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the superior frontal gyrus modulates craving for cigarettes. Biol Psychiatry 2011 ; 70 : 794–799. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Brown SL, Richardson M. The effect of distressing imagery on attention to and persuasiveness of an antialcohol message: a gaze-tracking approach. Health Educ Behav 2012 ; 39 : 8–17. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Oullier O. Clear up this fuzzy thinking on brain scans. Nature 2012 ; 483 : 7. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Basso F, Oullier O. Smokers are suckers: should incongruous metaphors be used in public health prevention? Am J Public Health 2011 ; 101 : 203–204. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Hill C. Épidémiologie du tabagisme. Rev Prat (Paris) 2012 ; 62 : 325–329.
  56. Commission Européenne (DG SANCO). Applying behavioural insights to policy-making. Conférence internationale organisée à Bruxelles le 30 septembre 2013. http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/health_consumer/information_sources/consumer_affairs_events_en.htm
  57. Oullier O. Behavioural insights are vital to policy-making. Nature 2013 ; 501 : 463. [CrossRef] [PubMed]